From NewsOK.com: Wrong. Harris got worked the first time and completely missed his block. The second time, yes, he blocked his man successfully.
I opened this up and expected to see a blank post... You're completely right, by the way, Rhino. Everyone I was watching the game with said the same thing right after the play-not only did Tommie miss his block, but his man made the tackle.
A tad picky aren't we? I'm almost positive they ran to the opposite side the first play (now maybe he got abused anyway but it really doesn't matter does it?).
Picky? Not al all, just calling it the way it happened. TH's guy beat him on the inside pretty handily on the first play.
scotplum- Tommie was lined up on the right side of the line. The play went to the center-right tackle gap. TH's man made the tackle.
Really, hmm. Guess memory didn't serve correctly. For some reason I had asked myself at the time he went in why would they put him in and run the opposite way. Oh well. It was probably because that darn girl that had to stand up on the bench in front of me with the huge SoonerHead so I couldn't see!
You sad, sad, woman. You must really be bored. Thanks for cluttering the board with old useless posts in some pathetic attempt at vindication! BTW, if you re-re-re-read my original post, I never said the editorial staff at the Oklahoman was good at their job.
If I wanted to clutter up the board with insulting topics and posts about the Daily Oklahoman it would have clogged up at least 3 pages, as opposed to the 2 threads I pulled up. I have no intentions of reading anymore of your nonsense. Your first post was more than enough to figure out that you just came on this board to be ugly. You are here for one reason and one reason only, to look for trouble and incite arguments with whomever will participate. Congratulations on being the first and only member of my ignore list.
I don't know. I haven't run the numbers myself, but I would imagine that if you took all the information in the Oklahoman, you'd probably find that at least 51% of it is correct. If that's the case, then wrong information is NOT the norm. Maybe it has more wrong information than most papers, but I dunno.
It has been judged and found wanting! The Joklahoman is and has been judged to be the absolute worst large scale newpaper published within these here united states. I do find it extremely normal to pick up the glorified *** wipe and find at least one copy error on the very front page. It happens almost daily. Or did, before I quit reading it completely, which coincidentally coincided with the hiring of Jeni Carlson. It really has nothing to do with the politics and everything to do with the quality of the paper itself and the integrity of the journalism held within. This is an eight pager article, the remainder of which can be found here.
