..
OK, I'm hooked on vcash.
Originally Posted by olevetonahill
Northern Illinois isn't the Salukies. That would be Southern Illinois.
"The choices we discern as having been made in the Constitutional Convention impose burdens on governmental proceses that often seem clumsy, inefficient, even unworkable, but those hard choices were consciously made by men who had lived under a form of government that permitted arbitrary governmental acts to go unchecked." INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) (Burger, C.J.)
Whatever. The way the game is going right now Southern Illinois could probably have done a better job. And yes, it would also be N. Illinois + 11 1/2, but I really doubt that's going to be an issue.Originally Posted by Mike Rich
... that's not food.
Gimme some cash!
"The choices we discern as having been made in the Constitutional Convention impose burdens on governmental proceses that often seem clumsy, inefficient, even unworkable, but those hard choices were consciously made by men who had lived under a form of government that permitted arbitrary governmental acts to go unchecked." INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) (Burger, C.J.)
NIU = teh suck.
... that's not food.
quote = teh obviousOriginally Posted by GottaHavePride
I didn't even get to bet because I had no idea this bowl existed...lol