In two years the Dims will be in control of the White House, the Senate,and the House.
In two years the Dims will be in control of the White House, the Senate,and the House.
well, he is a uniter, not a divider. He has managed to unite the democrats in the only way they can be united....against him.
It's awfully soon to make that prediction. The democrats, whose only Iraq idea seems to be the ridiculous "Strategic redeployment" option, will now have to actually come up with real ideas or they'll find themselves out of office in 2 years. Particularly if they let Pelosi and her crew dictate the agenda which there's no way most of America is in favor of.
Originally Posted by Widescreen
exactly I can see them all sitting in a room staring at each other saying well we won, now what?
pass the beer nuts.Originally Posted by usmc-sooner
I taste terrific.
Originally Posted by OU4LIFE
don't touch my nuts, I'm not that kind of Republican.
The great Republican think tank has spoken.Originally Posted by dolemitesooner
If the democrats move toward a beer nut platform i'll have no choice but to join them.Originally Posted by OU4LIFE
Thats the ****ing truth...most of the republicians on this board are partisan nut jobs.Originally Posted by Mjcpr
Who knew John McCain trolled here?Originally Posted by dolemitesooner
"General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"
President Ronald Reagan at the Berlin Wall, June 12, 1987
as a democrat, i hope you're wrong. if a dem takes the white house, i want the republicans or anybody besides the dems really to take the house and/or senate.Originally Posted by dolemitesooner
checks and balances are good. blanket acceptance of a one minded agenda are bad.
BYAAAAAAHHHH!
I taste terrific.
I agree completely and totally with every word you just typed.Originally Posted by leavingthezoo
I agree's. It doesn't matter which side is which, as long as there is balance it usually works best for the country. It's a good thing the reps lost this. As long as the force is balanced, we'll be okay.Originally Posted by leavingthezoo
Originally Posted by leavingthezoo
Glad I'm not the only one. I have a hard time believing one side has a monopoly on good ideas or will honestly do what's best rather than what serves their purpose more. Taking the average of the two seems much more appealing.
Originally Posted by dolemitesooner
I don't think my budget can afford for that to happen.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy.
Meaning absolutely no offense, the South Oval has not been very successful (on either side of the aisle) predicting what "most of America is in favor of."Originally Posted by Widescreen
there is no way you typed that yourself. Where did you hide the typos?Originally Posted by dolemitesooner
Seriously, who helped you?
"I'm a mother****ing party all by myself."
You must not know much about Pelosi.Originally Posted by OCUDad
i'm going to have to hurt you, aren't i?Originally Posted by Fugue