if you have an undergraduate background in economics and math(which I don't particularly). If economics isn't the least fun thing you can do, I would be surprised. On the upside, I will be done with the dismal science soon enough.
if you have an undergraduate background in economics and math(which I don't particularly). If economics isn't the least fun thing you can do, I would be surprised. On the upside, I will be done with the dismal science soon enough.
For the good old American lifestyle: For the money, for the glory, and for the fun... mostly for the money.
Macro-Economics was almost the end of my undergraduate "career". Made it through by the skin of my teeth.
Originally Posted by olevetonahill
Yeah, if you're going to take grad-level econ courses having actually taken some undergrad stuff would probably helps. It also helps to have the calc series down as well as some diff. eq.
At one point I was planning on getting a postgraduate degree in econ-in fact, I was hoping to get into the University of Chicago dual PhD/JD program. Both Posner and Friedman were on the faculty. Then I realized that even had I been accepted I would have left school roughly in third-world nation kinds of debt.
"The choices we discern as having been made in the Constitutional Convention impose burdens on governmental proceses that often seem clumsy, inefficient, even unworkable, but those hard choices were consciously made by men who had lived under a form of government that permitted arbitrary governmental acts to go unchecked." INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) (Burger, C.J.)
I know enough calc to survive, it's just doesn't come as natural to me as the people that have been doing econ for years. It just isn't as much fun as some the other stuff.
For the good old American lifestyle: For the money, for the glory, and for the fun... mostly for the money.
No reason EVAR to use "econ" and "fun" in the same sentence unless you just won the Lotto.
Posting Permissions
