Yeah, sure. Juan knows securing the boarder has nothing to do with the LEGAL ports of entry.Originally Posted by Serenity Now
Yeah, sure. Juan knows securing the boarder has nothing to do with the LEGAL ports of entry.
OleVet Posse Instigator
So what are the dem talking points against Paul?
I'm sure the neocon ones are BS
They're keeping their powder dry at the moment, by and large, but what little has come out of their camp has been along the lines of "Paul is just the same typical failed Republican that America has already seen." Which isn't very imaginative. You can say a lot of things about Paul, but 'typical Republican' is assuredly not one of them.So what are the dem talking points against Paul?
I'm sure the neocon ones are BS
Still, I can understand their reticence to go on the offensive at this point. It really wouldn't be prudent for them to start going after the GOP field. Better to stay positive and weight for the GOP contenders to cannibalize themselves before moving in to finish them off.
Are the illegals entering the US illegally through our ports of entry?
haha. Whatever Beary wants...Beary gets!?!?
Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.
Missed this post Turd...
Exactly.
These days that's probably true...just walk up to a ICE official and tell him you are seeking asylum and you'll given years of residency just waiting on the legal process.
Like Ive said I dont pay much tention in the early goings But I have fingered out why Sic is so Up on Rand LOL
Look where Rand went to skool = Alma mater Baylor University (no degree)
Much like out little hero of Politics Sic. Baylor (No degree)
They Twinkies Cept rand might be a tad better lookin
Quote
If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !
From a strategic standpoint, it seems like it would be a poor decision to go after a guy like Rand. I'm not sure that Rand will go the distance, but if somebody else does, I'd imagine Rand leaves them at least limping, if not worse.
As someone has already posted, no reason for Dems, MSM, Indies or
anyone else to take aim at any Pub till after the circular firing squad
that will surely come in the myriad number of debates...
The "impartial" moderators will see to that.
Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.
Well, Snuffolouphagus ain't goin to. Maybe they can get Candy lov'n Crowley in there...
OleVet Posse Instigator
The problem is, "lead us back to greatness", to most of the minority's, means removing the government teat out of their mouths. The pu$$y a$$ libs have pandered to the welfare/SSI crowd enough to swing the vote I fear. I will probably vote for Rand, but I'm afraid it's too little, too late. I hope not...
OleVet Posse Instigator
Rand would be a good choice though not the best. He has been able to pick up some political tailwind from his dad without that underlying 'nut job' innuendo that has been leveled at Ron Paul.
Who is better?
Bobby Jindal or Ben Carson IMO though Rand Paul wouldn't be far behind. I can't shake a bit of lingering doubt that Rand Paul is a politician masquerading as a conservative ideologue.
Bobby Jindal has done a disastrous job at managing Louisiana's finances, and Ben Carson has been all over the map with his positions repeatedly making questionable statements only to pull back and re-position. At any given time, he has called for both greater gun control and more government involvement in healthcare. Carson isn't even close to ready for prime time.
He hasn't had much of a tailwind at all from his dad since his dad's real core base has proven to be very distrustful of Rand. They're just now starting to come around a little bit, but that's a tough row to hoe.
I think Ben wants be Rand's VP.
Posting Permissions
