Obama awarded "4 pinocchios" on Keystone Pipeline.

[okie52]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA me laughing at you. Can you read? Myself and 5-0 were comparing your backing of the taker rancher and property rights and a private company putting a pipeline on land the OWNERS don't want it put on, which of course you fully support. Nothing about the oil or anything else. I see you somehow got buffet in argument.

You were describing the fluid "logic" of the wingnuts and then you went on to say (I'll repost it for you since you obviously lost track):

Boy you and fan keep changing the lead in here. Go look up LOGIC. You tell me oil is already being brought in on trains - so we don't even need the pipeline. Thank you for making the point for the President. Obama has approved pipelines already? So there is no wer on earl? Thanks for clearing all that up. Good job.

I tried to help you out by restating your usual independent, objective thought process regarding Obama's pipeline veto. No one could ever seriously call you a lemming. Brilliant viewpoint, I might add. Thoughtful, well informed, objective.

You had mentioned that those crazy wingnuts would do anything to help the Kochs but I knew you would abhor the fact that Buffett, a large dem supporter, was a primary beneficiary of the pipeline being vetoed. I think we all know how much you detest hypocrisy.

I also knew that you would want to address the outrageous smear by that conservative rag, the Washington Post, on Obama's character because he would never intentionally mislead the American public.

After all, you are a man integrity.

[Sooner8th]

---You mean like Warren Buffett building new rail lines?

Show me where buffett is building new rail lines and taking people property.

[Sooner8th]

You were describing the fluid "logic" of the wingnuts and then you went on to say (I'll repost it for you since you obviously lost track):I tried to help you out by restating your usual independent, objective thought process regarding Obama's pipeline veto. No one could ever seriously call you a lemming. Brilliant viewpoint, I might add. Thoughtful, well informed, objective. You had mentioned that those crazy wingnuts would do anything to help the Kochs but I knew you would abhor the fact that Buffett, a large dem supporter, was a primary beneficiary of the pipeline being vetoed. I think we all know how much you detest hypocrisy. I also knew that you would want to address the outrageous smear by that conservative rag, the Washington Post, on Obama's character because he would never intentionally mislead the American public.After all, you are a man integrity.

You just pulled back into the lead from fan. Good job. Can you not follow a simple conversation? 5-0 and I were comparing the rights love of PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS between the welfare, taker, deadbeat rancher and your ignoring people not wanting to have a pipeline on their PERSONAL PROPERTY. Following pumpkin? Then for some reason you brought up the oil is already being brought in on trains adding it's some corny thing with buffett. YOU tried to tie the logic of the PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS to oil on trains.

[REDREX]

Show me where buffett is building new rail lines and taking people property.

----Buffett owns BNSF----BNSF uses eminent domain to build rail lines----Can you follow that PUMPKIN?

[Sooner8th]

----Buffett owns BNSF----BNSF uses eminent domain to build rail lines----Can you follow that PUMPKIN?

First off what the fvck does that have to do with conservatives loving property rights while ignoring them on the keystone pipeline. And on bnsf - prove it.

[REDREX]

First off what the fvck does that have to do with conservatives loving property rights while ignoring them on the keystone pipeline. And on bnsf - prove it.

---You are such an idiot ---no railroad has ever operated without eminent domain ----Prove me wrong PUMPKIN

[Sooner8th]

---You are such an idiot ---no railroad has ever operated without eminent domain ----Prove me wrong PUMPKIN

You made a claim and want me to disprove it? Brilliant logic there mr conservative. I'll take your demanding I disprove it as you can't prove it. Stop making sh!t up.

[REDREX]

You made a claim and want me to disprove it? Brilliant logic there mr conservative. I'll take your demanding I disprove it as you can't prove it. Stop making sh!t up.

---I am not making it up and like I said you are an idiot----I think everyone will agree on that

[okie52]

You just pulled back into the lead from fan. Good job. Can you not follow a simple conversation? 5-0 and I were comparing the rights love of PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS between the welfare, taker, deadbeat rancher and your ignoring people not wanting to have a pipeline on their PERSONAL PROPERTY. Following pumpkin? Then for some reason you brought up the oil is already being brought in on trains adding it's some corny thing with buffett. YOU tried to tie the logic of the PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS to oil on trains.

Thanks 8th. It is quite an honor to be in the lead with you. Likewise, you've been in the lead with me, too, for quite some time. Nobody else is even running a close 2nd. Bravo!!!

You probably need to contact the board administrator because someone has obviously hacked your account and is posting under your name.

Boy you and fan keep changing the lead in here. Go look up LOGIC. You tell me oil is already being brought in on trains - so we don't even need the pipeline. Thank you for making the point for the President. Obama has approved pipelines already? So there is no wer on earl? Thanks for clearing all that up. Good job.

Since you seem to have no recollection of this post it proves that someone has tampered with your account. I should have known you wouldn't have posted something this stupid.

[okie52]

You made a claim and want me to disprove it? Brilliant logic there mr conservative. I'll take your demanding I disprove it as you can't prove it. Stop making sh!t up.

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/09/09-8003.pdf

[okie52]

I. How do Railroads Acquire their Interests?

Railroad companies have multiple ways to acquire interests in lands used for rights-of-way. The main methods for acquisition are federal or state government grants, condemnation and purchase. Other possibilities include license or prescription.

The most common uses of property taken by eminent domain are for government buildings and other facilities, public utilities, highways, and railroads.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain

[BetterSoonerThanLater]

I can't help but think that Obama's decision to stop keystone was in direct correlation to helping his buddy Buffet grow his railroad. More money for Buffet means more money for Obama and the Dems...


eminent domain is terrible,unless it falls directly in the scope of positive personal interest of the Obama's and buffet's of the world. Pipeline is bad! it will destroy the aquifer!! its takes away private land!!! Railroad much better.Railroad much safer. Eminent domain is ok for railroad development . Obama used the EPA report to shut down keystone, and allow buffet to prosper.

[hawaii 5-0]

The original plan was to ship the dirty oil west to British Columbia but both Saskatchewan and BC rejected the plan. They didn't it running thru their provinces.

Well, it's moot for awhile. The Senate didn't have enough support to override the veto.

Thank God there's some true Conservatives out there. As in 'conserve', to not waste.

5-0

[Sooner8th]

I can't help but think that Obama's decision to stop keystone was in direct correlation to helping his buddy Buffet grow his railroad. More money for Buffet means more money for Obama and the Dems...


eminent domain is terrible,unless it falls directly in the scope of positive personal interest of the Obama's and buffet's of the world. Pipeline is bad! it will destroy the aquifer!! its takes away private land!!! Railroad much better.Railroad much safer. Eminent domain is ok for railroad development . Obama used the EPA report to shut down keystone, and allow buffet to prosper.

You have got to me kidding me.................helping buffet? Laughable........new conspiracy theory.

[Sooner in Tampa]

^^^^^^^^^ Troll ^^^^^^^^^^^

Lying, stinking, no paragraph writing, worthless POS troll. Proven liar. Copy and paste plagiarist thief. Lowlife, ignorant scum.

[TheHumanAlphabet]

What's the value of a major spill of very dirty oil that makes it way into the aquifer ?

We're still waiting on BP to clean up their mess in the Gulf. Oh, but offshore drilling is perfectly safe.

The real danger is when some private foreign company wants to take your land by using our own laws.



5-0

get yourfacts straight. The Ogallalla is so deep, no, I mean, no amount of oil spill out of a pipeline rupture would come close to any part of the formation.

what is being wasted? The dilbit would be shipped to the Gulf Coast for upgrading and put mostly into the U.S. Market for gas and diesel and jet fuel. Somemay be shipped out of the U.S. But not thebulk...

[BetterSoonerThanLater]

You have got to me kidding me.................helping buffet? Laughable........new conspiracy theory.

great retort. When you have no valid argument, just call it laughable and claim conspiracy theory. dumbass