The donor gets influence, which you and I are unable to access. The pols get the money they need to run their continual campaigns, minus a percentage for personal slush.
I take from that fact that we ought to be about reducing the influence of money in politics. What do you think should be done about it? Since both the pols and the donors benefit from the current system, it will be danged hard to change anything.
Ukraine: Not Our Fight.
More epicycles!
Ike did do some good things as you listed above. The problem I have with him is he was way to influenced by his group of golfing buddies. His 2.5% gdp average yearly growth is pretty weak given the circumstances we were in. Got us out of korea, but left us with two korea's.
As for good people don't vote republican, that is mostly tongue in cheek. Most of my friends are conservatives who vote Republican. We don't talk politics much.
The discouraging thing is this: HRC already has the Left Coast and the People's Republic of New England in the bag. Plus most any minority voter and all the females enamored with having the first woman president will march in lockstep to the polls, all the while only having the faintest idea about the structure and function of our federal government. But they'll get their girl elected.
Then the title of the book Barbara Olson wrote about HRC all those years ago will really become ominous: Hell To Pay.
Wonder who's gonna pay that bill?
Quote
If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !
Quote
If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !
this is bull****
Com won Vet, you know as well as I do, he'd never show up. He would be revealing himself as the little bitch he really is, and then he wouldn't have a leg to stand on on this board.
I still don't understand why he wastes his time here. If he was genuinely civil, it would be one thing, but he isn't. He must love getting his hearty rate up. He'll maybe that's the only way he can!!
this is bull****