Thanks Sooner I knew he had to have Blamed Bush for something. What a camel breathed moronic Dildo.
Thanks Sooner I knew he had to have Blamed Bush for something. What a camel breathed moronic Dildo.
Quote
If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !
Job participation has nothing to do with job creation. Bush still lost private sector jobs and obama is growing private sector jobs.
----Obama is not creating anything the private sector is creating jobs---If anything Barack makes it harder to grow employment-----------Work force participation is part of the calculation for unemployment----If the rate was the same now as when Barack took over the unemployment rate would be over 10%--------How could anyone believe that Barack's policies are helping job growth?
Last edited by Sooner8th; 10/3/2014 at 08:37 PM.
Sorry, government doesn't create jobs - it destroys them. Especially when it's policies are anti business.
The only thing Obama is good at is appointing incompetents like himself. That happens when your first priority is skin color, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, and everything else other than real qualification.
Data is data - the trick is in correctly identifying cause and effect relationships, rather than just declaring what is opinion to be factual correlation
Last edited by Since71ASooner4Life; 10/3/2014 at 10:40 PM.
Everything progressives do is aimed at weakening democracy, capitalism and the social and cultural institutions that support those things...... They are about subjugating people and being a ruling class.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli
Let's talk about the mark of a real leader. A man is only as good as his word. How does Barack Obama stack up? Just a trail of broken promises.
“We will double our exports over the next five years.” (2010 State of the Union address)
“We will close the detention camp in Guantanamo Bay, the location of so many of the worst constitutional abuses in recent years.”
"Will eliminate all income taxation of seniors making less than $50,000 per year. This will eliminate taxes for 7 million seniors -- saving them an average of $1,400 a year-- and will also mean that 27 million seniors will not need to file an income tax return at all."
"I’m pledging to cut the deficit by half by the end of my first term in office." "I will be held accountable" "If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a one-term proposition."
In the first five years of George W. Bush’s presidency, the rate fell 1.2 percentage points. (At the time, Democrats might have tried to claim that under the “Bush economy” the labor participation rate was “the worst in two decades.”) Five years into Obama’s presidency, the rate has fallen 2.7 percentage points.
So clearly the decline has been faster under Obama, though again, demographic factors have played an important role.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in 2012 concluded that just over half of the post-1999 decline in the participation rate comes from the retirement of the baby boomers. Critically, the research showed that the problem is only going to get worse in the rest of the decade, with retirements accounting for two-thirds of the decline of participation rate by 2020. In other words, the rate will keep declining, no matter how well the economy does.
Barclays economists, meanwhile, say that just 15 percent of the drop in the labor force stems from people who want a job and are of prime working age (25-54). “We view the possibility of a large and sudden return of previously discouraged job seekers to the labor force as remote,” they wrote.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...e-in-40-years/
Workforce Labor Participation Rate has fallen precipitously under Zero b/c his voters thot he was going to pay their rent, gas for car, new kitchen, etc. Plenty of video of people saying this stuff.
Read above.
In the first five years of George W. Bush’s presidency, the rate fell 1.2 percentage points. (At the time, Democrats might have tried to claim that under the “Bush economy” the labor participation rate was “the worst in two decades.”) Five years into Obama’s presidency, the rate has fallen 2.7 percentage points.
It started falling under bush.
The "percentage points" at which people are dropping out of the labor force has more than doubled under Zero. But,,,he did get Bin Laden, eighth!
Do you understand it's a trend? Only 15% of people are not participating are not looking for jobs. The rest are retired or getting more school.
Funny how it is that you want to blame obama for the labor force participation that has been dropping since 2000, but he does not get credit for the 6 million jobs he has created.
Who gets credit for job creation? Obama did not create a dayum thing cept a tuffer environment for business to work under. Government/POTUS cannot help Capitalism/job creation until he steps away.
I do however blame him for Workforce Labor Participation Rate cause half of America (liprogdems) were expecting a free ride when he was elected.
Ok look and ye shall find, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey,
Series Id: LNU05026645
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Unadj) Not in Labor Force, Searched For Work and Available, Discouraged Reasons For Not Currently Looking
Labor force status: Not in labor force
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Job desires/not in labor force: Want a job now
Reasons not in labor force: Discouragement over job prospects (Persons who believe no job is available.)
January 2009 734,000
September 2014 698,000
HHUUUMMMMM seems the number of people who are not looking for jobs because of Discouragement over job prospects has actually FELL. HUH, stop listening to rightwingnuts from the heritage foundation and find some data for yourself.
BTW - just for fun and giggles when dubya took office it was 301,000, just sayin'
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet