The Shannon thing seems extremely unfair on the surface as nothing reported to the public sounded as if there was any misconduct. But the thing that nags me about it is that a committee of 5 people determined there was misconduct (or at least 3 of 5 did). Contrary to what has been posted here, none of those 5 was Boren. But as Kanto says, that's the problem with using title IX as a system of justice made worse by sealed documents. It could well be that the committee has information that we don't, but any process like this has to be transparent to be fair.