Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27
  1. #1
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member
    Location
    Wishing I was moving to Monroe, Oklahoma...
    Posts
    11,182
    vCash
    500

    Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Dems in IN convicted on all counts...was not eligible for the IN ballot in 2008.

    report further documents that fraud likely tipped the balance for The Fraudster in Chief nationally...
    Everything progressives do is aimed at weakening democracy, capitalism and the social and cultural institutions that support those things...... They are about subjugating people and being a ruling class.

  2. #2
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member SanJoaquinSooner's Avatar
    Location
    The Great San Joaquin Valley
    Posts
    6,625
    vCash
    1500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    I knew all along Hillary should have been President!
    Ingles solamente (¡no exepciones!)

  3. #3
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1
    Posts
    3,772
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by SanJoaquinSooner View Post
    I knew all along Hillary should have been President!
    What difference, at this point, does it make?

  4. #4
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member
    Location
    Wishing I was moving to Monroe, Oklahoma...
    Posts
    11,182
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by SanJoaquinSooner View Post
    I knew all along Hillary should have been President!
    At least with her running, conservatives stood a better chance to be in the WH.
    Everything progressives do is aimed at weakening democracy, capitalism and the social and cultural institutions that support those things...... They are about subjugating people and being a ruling class.

  5. #5
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member cleller's Avatar
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    5,320
    vCash
    1355

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Lots of criminals with a "D" on their voter registration for sure.

  6. #6
    Vacuums eat while yelling

    badger's Avatar
    Location
    Doing my nails
    Posts
    41,561
    vCash
    0

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    This type of thing is the exact way that Democrats are going to lose their control of the Oval Office and Senate. This type of thing sticks with voters.

  7. #7
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member Soonerjeepman's Avatar
    Location
    paradise
    Posts
    7,863
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    not for the 47% badge, those people do not want to give up their freebies. Sure it MIGHT swing some voters but the majority that voted for obama will use the excuse that everyone does it, which they are pretty correct, they just got caught. The young people of today, that I talk to, don't seem to have those morals. We shall see.
    How do you know if you get there, if you don't know where you are going?..oh and I had 1,713 post on the "other board"..I hate being a rookie again!

  8. #8
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1
    Posts
    4,967
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Are you kidding me. There were two cases of fraud on the petition and that should invalidate the entire petition?

    If that's the standard we live by then we've never had a valid president.

    With hundreds of millions of eligible voters there is going to be fraud. It's simply the law of statistics.

    How many people are required to sign a petition to get someone on the ballot in Indiana?


    And, Badger, if you don't think that happens on both sides then I've got a bridge to sell you.

  9. #9
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member
    Location
    Wishing I was moving to Monroe, Oklahoma...
    Posts
    11,182
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Jkj, perhaps if you read the article, you would have the answers to your questions. The Socialist was not eligible for the 2008 election in Indiana and the article also documented fraud across the country in favor of The Socialist.
    Everything progressives do is aimed at weakening democracy, capitalism and the social and cultural institutions that support those things...... They are about subjugating people and being a ruling class.

  10. #10
    Baylor Ambassador SicEmBaylor's Avatar
    Location
    74434
    Posts
    21,870
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by sappstuf View Post
    What difference, at this point, does it make?
    None. And, for the record, it wouldn't have made much of a difference at this point if it were Romney either.

  11. #11
    Stayatworkdad yermom's Avatar
    Location
    Nomran
    Posts
    48,866
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by Soonerjeepman View Post
    not for the 47% badge, those people do not want to give up their freebies. Sure it MIGHT swing some voters but the majority that voted for obama will use the excuse that everyone does it, which they are pretty correct, they just got caught. The young people of today, that I talk to, don't seem to have those morals. We shall see.
    do you really want to keep bringing up that number?

  12. #12
    Sooner All-World olevetonahill's Avatar
    Location
    the Hills of S/E Ok
    Posts
    64,897
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    So does this mean we get a Mulligan?
    http://www.soonerfans.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=38933&dateline=130040  9398

    Quote
    If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !

  13. #13
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    18,736
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by badger View Post
    This type of thing is the exact way that Democrats are going to lose their control of the Oval Office and Senate. This type of thing sticks with voters.
    Not all those who are low information types, and have been conditioned by the MSM that all republicans are evil capitalist thieves who feed your gramma dog food and actually don't want illegals to vote. Nor will all those who just want the govt. to play santa claus with the money they get from taxpayers.
    Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.

  14. #14
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member Soonerjeepman's Avatar
    Location
    paradise
    Posts
    7,863
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by yermom View Post
    do you really want to keep bringing up that number?
    ok the 52% that voted for obama...better?
    How do you know if you get there, if you don't know where you are going?..oh and I had 1,713 post on the "other board"..I hate being a rookie again!

  15. #15
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1
    Posts
    4,967
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone! View Post
    Not all those who are low information types, and have been conditioned by the MSM that all republicans are evil capitalist thieves who feed your gramma dog food and actually don't want illegals to vote. Nor will all those who just want the govt. to play santa claus with the money they get from taxpayers.
    It's not about illegals. Both sides know the true story.

    The fear is that democrats (especially those on the poor end of the spectrum) are more likely to not have a government ID than republicans.

    Both sides understand this. Neither want to say it directly. It's not exactly an endorsement of this segment of the Democratic base. As for Republicans they don't want to be seen as systematically denying the vote for eligible voters.

    Both sides know that this issue isn't really about fraud but instead protecting their own interests.

  16. #16
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1
    Posts
    4,967
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheHumanAlphabet View Post
    Jkj, perhaps if you read the article, you would have the answers to your questions. The Socialist was not eligible for the 2008 election in Indiana and the article also documented fraud across the country in favor of The Socialist.
    There is no doubt in anyone's mind that they could have come up with enough signature to get Obama on the ballot. Obama wasn't exactly a borderline candidate.

    It would have been a major injustice to deny Obama the ability to be on the ballot after the fact because a couple of criminals committed voter fraud. If you are going to do that you have to do it in time for Obama to get the necessary signatures.

    I'm not defending these guys one bit but your assertion that two people falsifying a petition to get Obama on the ballot renders his election invalid is ridiculous.

  17. #17
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member Blue's Avatar
    Location
    Bham
    Posts
    13,883
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    People calling him a socialist are being too kind. He along w/ Clinton and the Bushes are fascists. Control freaks. This has been going on for too long and it's probably too late to correct course. The govt owns our asses.

  18. #18
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member
    Location
    Wishing I was moving to Monroe, Oklahoma...
    Posts
    11,182
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by jkjsooner View Post
    There is no doubt in anyone's mind that they could have come up with enough signature to get Obama on the ballot. Obama wasn't exactly a borderline candidate.

    It would have been a major injustice to deny Obama the ability to be on the ballot after the fact because a couple of criminals committed voter fraud. If you are going to do that you have to do it in time for Obama to get the necessary signatures.

    I'm not defending these guys one bit but your assertion that two people falsifying a petition to get Obama on the ballot renders his election invalid is ridiculous.
    You are delusional! Had the fraud not happened, he would not have been on the indiana ballot. EVIDENCE has been shown that in at least one county he likely would not have had the signatures to be on the ballot. In IN you need to be on all county ballots, as I understand, to be on the statewide ballot. Ole Hillary would have won by default...
    Everything progressives do is aimed at weakening democracy, capitalism and the social and cultural institutions that support those things...... They are about subjugating people and being a ruling class.

  19. #19
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1
    Posts
    3,772
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by jkjsooner View Post
    It's not about illegals. Both sides know the true story.

    The fear is that democrats (especially those on the poor end of the spectrum) are more likely to not have a government ID than republicans.

    Both sides understand this. Neither want to say it directly. It's not exactly an endorsement of this segment of the Democratic base. As for Republicans they don't want to be seen as systematically denying the vote for eligible voters.

    Both sides know that this issue isn't really about fraud but instead protecting their own interests.
    That might be the fear and Dems do love their fear, but it has not been born out with the facts. Minority voting went up in Georgia after voter ID laws were passed.

    You cannot operate in today's modern society without an ID. Why do Dems wish to keep minorities living in the 1930s?

  20. #20
    Sooner All-World olevetonahill's Avatar
    Location
    the Hills of S/E Ok
    Posts
    64,897
    vCash
    500

    Re: Can we change The Socialist's title to Fraudster in Chief?

    Quote Originally Posted by sappstuf View Post
    That might be the fear and Dems do love their fear, but it has not been born out with the facts. Minority voting went up in Georgia after voter ID laws were passed.

    You cannot operate in today's modern society without an ID. Why do Dems wish to keep minorities living in the 1930s?
    No **** bro, WTF are they afraid of? Hell a Low income Dem. even needs a ****in ID to apply for FOOD STAMPS.

    http://www.ehow.com/about_6715611_do...d-stamps_.html
    http://www.soonerfans.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=38933&dateline=130040  9398

    Quote
    If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •