REPUBLICANS DON'T BELIEVE IN AMERICA OR THE CONSTITUTION

[ictsooner7]

This is what is wrong with your party and he should be recalled! What happened to following the constitution? Teaparty lies.

Rand Paul: 'Obamacare' is still unconstitutional

By SCOTT WONG |
6/28/12 11:46 AM EDT


Sen. Rand Paul doesn’t think the Supreme Court gets the last word on what’s constitutional.

The Kentucky Republican belittled the high court’s health care decision as the flawed opinion of just a “couple people.”

“Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional,” the freshman lawmaker said in a statement. “While the court may have erroneously come to the conclusion that the law is allowable, it certainly does nothing to make this mandate or government takeover of our health care right.”

“Obamacare is wrong for Americans. It will destroy our health care system,” added Paul, who frequently rails about government overreach on the Senate floor. “This now means we fight every hour, every day until November to elect a new President and a new Senate to repeal Obamacare.”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-con...al-127574.html

[Sooner5030]

we are better off when people like the Pauls participate in our representative republic. If anything...you get a good counter argument rather than a bunch of stiffs sticking with the herd/mob.

[landrun]

REPUBLICANS DON'T BELIEVE IN AMERICA....

LOL!
Paul is right. Intelligent and honest people know it too.

The supreme court once ruled that a black man is only 3/5ths of a person.
Not one word of the constitution can be honestly interpreted to mean that and the court knew it then as we all do now. And that is Paul's point.

The supreme court isn't God. They interpret the constitution. We can only hope they're honest with themselves, us and the constitution when they do their job.
The problem is, that the left believe in a 'living document'. Basically meaning that they change the definition of terms to fit their generation's own fancy. - which we conservatives feel is a nice way of saying they're going to ignore the real meaning of the original document and change it to say what they want it to say whenever they want to. When our society allows that, we basically have no constitution.

But just because the supremes say... we say the Constitution means thus... doesn't mean the constitution said what they say it says.

And only a fool would think it does.

It just means we all have to live with their ruling.

[ictsooner7]

LOL!
Paul is right. Intelligent and honest people know it too.

The supreme court once ruled that a black man is only 3/5ths of a person.
Not one word of the constitution can be honestly interpreted to mean that and the court knew it then as we all do now. And that is Paul's point.

The supreme court isn't God. They interpret the constitution. We can only hope they're honest with themselves, us and the constitution when they do their job.
The problem is, that the left believe in a 'living document'. Basically meaning that they change the definition of terms to fit their generation's own fancy. - which we conservatives feel is a nice way of saying they're going to ignore the real meaning of the original document and change it to say what they want it to say whenever they want to. When our society allows that, we basically have no constitution.

But just because the supremes say... we say the Constitution means thus... doesn't mean the constitution said what they say it says.

And only a fool would think it does.

It just means we all have to live with their ruling.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You are killing me!!!

What happened to loving yourself some constitution? Our CONSTITUTION says that when the supreme courts says something is CONSTITUTIONAL it is CONSTITUTIONAL!!

What part of that do you not understand?

[olevetonahill]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You are killing me!!!

What happened to loving yourself some constitution? Our CONSTITUTION says that when the supreme courts says something is CONSTITUTIONAL it is CONSTITUTIONAL!!

What part of that do you not understand?

Dude you need to change yer panties, You been creamin in the ones yer wearin all day. they startin to get all stinky and wet

[diverdog]

LOL!
Paul is right.Intelligent and honest people know it too.

The supreme court once ruled that a black man is only 3/5ths of a person.
Not one word of the constitution can be honestly interpreted to mean that and the court knew it then as we all do now. And that is Paul's point.

The supreme court isn't God. They interpret the constitution. We can only hope they're honest with themselves, us and the constitution when they do their job.
The problem is, that the left believe in a 'living document'. Basically meaning that they change the definition of terms to fit their generation's own fancy. - which we conservatives feel is a nice way of saying they're going to ignore the real meaning of the original document and change it to say what they want it to say whenever they want to. When our society allows that, we basically have no constitution.

But just because the supremes say... we say the Constitution means thus... doesn't mean the constitution said what they say it says.

And only a fool would think it does.

It just means we all have to live with their ruling.

Do you guys ever read your constitution? Read Article 1 Section 2 and get back to me.

[ictsooner7]

Dude you need to change yer panties, You been creamin in the ones yer wearin all day. they startin to get all stinky and wet

WOW great comeback! Really convinced me my argument is completely wrong.

Another ignorant reply from the most ignorant poster on here.

[Sooner5030]

Do you guys ever read your constitution? Read Article 1 Section 2 and get back to me.

dd, we're just focusing in on the low hanging fruit. But don't allow that to make you feel too comfortable. Even if you can out-swim ICT it doesn't mean the sharks will not get you if teased.

[diverdog]

dd, we're just focusing in on the low hanging fruit. But don't allow that to make you feel too comfortable. Even if you can out-swim ICT it doesn't mean the sharks will not get you if teased.

pffft. Nothing a 12 gauge shotgun won't fix.

[landrun]

Do you guys ever read your constitution? Read Article 1 Section 2 and get back to me.

Fair enough. My illustration is wrong but the point is still valid.

[olevetonahill]

WOW great comeback! Really convinced me my argument is completely wrong.

Another ignorant reply from the most ignorant poster on here.

Dont care one way or the other about your"argument" Im simply pointing out how ignorant you have acted all day

[landrun]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You are killing me!!!

What happened to loving yourself some constitution? Our CONSTITUTION says that when the supreme courts says something is CONSTITUTIONAL it is CONSTITUTIONAL!!

What part of that do you not understand?

Your response is ignorant. What part of my post do you not understand?

[REDREX]

WOW great comeback! Really convinced me my argument is completely wrong.

Another ignorant reply from the most ignorant poster on here.

---If you were one of the people that will end up paying for this new law you would not be so happy

[soonercruiser]

Ict is delusional or very drunk!
Nancy Peloski and Harry Reid (not to mention Al NotSoSharpton) say completey incoherent things...not to mention the female Congresswoman Maxine Waters and everything is just fine!

Ron Paul Junior says something dumb, and now all Republicans get condemned!
Duh!
When did you stop beating your.....wife, ict?



How dare the Right use LW tactics??!!




And, of course nothing can top this!

[ictsooner7]

Ict is delusional or very drunk!
Nancy Peloski and Harry Reid (not to mention Al NotSoSharpton) say completey incoherent things...not to mention the female Congresswoman Maxine Waters and everything is just fine!

Ron Paul Junior says something dumb, and now all Republicans get condemned!
Duh!
When did you stop beating your.....wife, ict?



How dare the Right use LW tactics??!!




And, of course nothing can top this!

What does Nancy Peloski and Harry Reid have to do with Rand Paul ignoring the constitution?

Try again to cover up for the fact that your party claims they love the constitution, but when they shown they don't know sh!t about it, they ignore it.

BTW - half the republicans who were screaming READ THE BILL, didn't read it!

[ictsooner7]

“It’s like these guys take pride in being ignorant.”-

[okie52]

“It’s like these guys take pride in being ignorant.”-

Says the Solyndra backer.

[KantoSooner]

When the SC says something is constitutional, it is. Until, of course, they say it isn't. Which happens with greater frequency than most would like to admit. But, in a precedent-based legal system that's to be expected.

[Position Limit]

itc,

you need to tone it down a notch. i know these clowns are dummer than bag of hammers but come on man. you're dwelling on their mouth breathing level. politics and supreme court rulings are not football games. just lay in the cut and wait for another massive blunder by these dips**ts. it's too easy and so fu**ing obvious. chill the hell out.

[olevetonahill]

itc,

you need to tone it down a notch. i know these clowns are dummer than bag of hammers but come on man. you're dwelling on their mouth breathing level. politics and supreme court rulings are not football games. just lay in the cut and wait for another massive blunder by these dips**ts. it's too easy and so fu**ing obvious. chill the hell out.

AW Another superior intelligence mingling with the common folk .