People are pissed about the truth....lol
People are pissed about the truth....lol
Some folks prefer this kind of pic....
I'm sure that was a well thought out and fair slanted article.
Btw, who cares about Bachmann?
They are saying she took a quick pic to test the lighting and that Newsweek chose that pic to make her look bad.
Looks like a fark.
Everything progressives do is aimed at weakening democracy, capitalism and the social and cultural institutions that support those things...... They are about subjugating people and being a ruling class.
[
"Competition is the best motivator you have. That's Oklahoma."
-Jay Norvell
That is a really bad photo. It's not just the look on her face but the lighting is awful. They lit up the area around her eyes to where she has the Morticia Addams effect going on.
Loved By The People
"you are a disgusting pig and should be punished for such vile language. Would you like your mom to see that you wrote that? YOU=Disgusting pig."
"you lack any semblance of taste and suggest substandard upbringing and education"
"Guess what? You're a ****ing dildo!"
"You're an asshat!"
"racist pig by any chance?"
If I were a member of a vast left-wing media conspiracy, she's about the last person I would want to write a smear job about. I'd save that stuff until after she gets the nod.
"If your dream ain't bigger than you, there's a problem with your dream." -Deion Sanders
For the uninitiated: Any news source that doesn't treat the tea party line with respect and reverence is a leftist rag. That's because the tea party is the only accurate reflection of the views of all right-thinking, God-fearing, patriotic Americans.
It's kinda like ESPN having an anti-OU bias because they aren't Sooner fans like all decent folk should be.
You tell me it's the institution. Well, you know, you'd better free your mind instead.
(Shoo-bee doo-wah)
Strange bedfellows
One of presidential candidate Michele Bachmann’s major political opponents is defending her against what it says is blatant sexism on the part of Newsweek magazine.
Monday, the National Organization for Women (NOW) spoke out against Newsweek’s most recent cover, which features an extreme close-up of Michele Bachmann and the title “The Queen of Rage.”
“It’s sexist,” NOW president Terry O’Neill told TheDC. “Casting her in that expression and then adding ‘The Queen of Rage’ I think [it is]. Gloria Steinem has a very simple test: If this were done to a man or would it ever be done to a man – has it ever been done to a man? Surely this has never been done to a man.”
While some have pointed out that Newsweek has used unflattering photos of men such as Rush Limbaugh and John McCain on its cover, O’Neill says that is not the issue.
“Who has ever called a man ‘The King of Rage?’ Basically what Newsweek magazine – and this is important, what Newsweek magazine, not a blog, Newsweek magazine – what they are saying of a woman who is a serious contender for President of the United States of America…They are basically casting her as a nut job,” O’Neill said. “The ‘Queen of Rage’ is something you apply to wrestlers or somebody who is crazy. They didn’t even do this to Howard Dean when he had his famous scream.”
Newswish....
NewsweekFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Claims of bias:
A 2004 study by Tim Groseclose and Jeff Milyo asserted that Newsweek, along with a number of other mainstream news outlets, exhibited a "liberal bias." While liberal media watchdogs described the study as "riddled with flaws,"[26][27] their opposite numbers had similarly commented on Newsweek's alleged liberal bias.[28][29]
Newsweek's Washington Bureau Chief and later Assistant Managing Editor Evan Thomas variously acknowledged the charge saying, "I think Newsweek is a little liberal," and "there is a liberal bias at Newsweek, the magazine I work for."[30][31][32]
More recently, the magazine has begun publishing articles by conservative columnist George F. Will.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsweek
How can there be too many children?
That is like saying there are too many flowers.
Mother Teresa
-------------------
(Or, too many tax-payers!)