Since there's been so many gay threads around, I decided to add my own sorta gay thread...
A couple of weeks ago there was a lot of talk about the 30th anniversary of AIDS. I think this was dated back to the MMWR report from the CDC.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/june_5.htm
We're also coming up on the anniversary of the first report in the mainstream media - a NY Times article.
http://www.nytimes.com/1981/07/03/us...mosexuals.html
Anyway, for some reason I got fascinated on the subject - a subject I barely thought at the time other than being scared to use a public toilet. I don't think I even know of an outbreak of the mysterious disease until Rock Hudson got it.
There's a lot of interesting articles in the NY Times archives on it. From reading the articles, one thing was very clear. There was an assumption that if it was an infectious agent that a person would get sick very soon after being exposed to that agent. It was inconceivable that the period of dormancy could be approaching a decade. This lead many in the scientific community to believe it wasn't an infectious agent, if it was an infectious agent that it must be very difficult to transmit, that the infection rate was very low, etc. It's funny how so many researchers/doctors/scientists were led astray but this one simple assumption. They simply had no idea that when they first reported on the handful of cases that there were already tens of thousands infected.
There's also a very interesting Frontline documentary about the epidemic.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/aids/
The one thing I take away from all of this, and I'm sure this is going to be somewhat controversial, is that the minority of gays who were extremely sexually active in the '70s do deserve some blame. One negative to homosexuality is that there isn't the female controlling the rate of sexual promiscuity. If a gay person is so inclined, they can have sex with 15-20 guys a night and people were doing just that in the '70s. For 99.99% of straight men this simply is not an option.
I don't think this minority of gay men knew the risk they were putting society in and for that they deserve somewhat of a pass but let's face it, having sex with 15-20 random strangers a night (whether it be hetero or homo relations) is a recipe for an epidemiological disaster. Had it not been AIDS it would have probably been something else (and there was plenty of other diseases going around in this community as well). The same applies to IV drug users. Both are just a breeding ground for all sorts of nasty diseases.
Anyway, maybe someone will find these articles interesting. I love reading old articles with the benefit of hindsight.