Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.
other countries need permission to have opinions?
they didn't run their opinions past the golden eib microphone probably.
Are you under the weather?(Shirley, you can do better than that)Originally Posted by yermom
Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.
I'll play devils advocate here (I DON'T THINK THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DO THIS AT ALL!) but....paybacks a bitch America
Mmmmmm....Megyn Kelly. Want. Sex.
Atheist.
So, Americans are entering all those countries illegally, and staying there, and getting govt. freebies? I.Did.Not.Know.That!
Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.
No I was aiming at more or less a century of US intervention in Latin American affairs
It's sad that it's come to this but what can you expect from the republican outsourcing of jobs all over the World? Now these Countries think they have a valid interest in keeping their access to the Country.
Obama? I'd say it's his problem but probably more of another backlash from the previous administration.
The coverage from Fox there is so bad that I really can't tell from them what exactly is going on here.
So I had to dig a little deeper.
The court allowed these countries to submit Amicus Briefs (or Friend-of-the-court) briefs. Which if I understand that correctly, hardly amounts to interference. IF they make a good argument then they make a good argument, and the court should hear it...good ideas or arguments can come from anywhere. And as I understand it, foreign governments routinely submit amicus briefs, even to the supreme court.
In other words...it's really a non-story
http://volokh.com/2010/10/07/ninth-c...igration-laws/
For instance, SB 1070, whether right or wrong, and federally preempted or unpreempted, does affect the interests not just of Mexicans who are illegally in the U.S. but also Mexicans who are legally in the U.S. (Investigation of suspected illegal aliens will inevitably lead to some burden even on legal aliens, since not every suspected illegal alien will prove to actually be an illegal alien — that doesn’t mean SB 1070 is a bad law, but it does mean that Mexico has an interest in the law even as to its entirely law-abiding citizens, and not just its citizens who are violating U.S. immigration law.) Why shouldn’t Mexico advocate on its citizens’ behalf? And why shouldn’t our institutions listen politely to such advocacy?
Prayers for you and your ilk.
Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.
Posting Permissions
