is this a fair statement for me to say?
"A huge reason why the health care bill passed, is because Geroge W. Bush messed things up so bad, and gave away the seats in the house and senate to the dems?"
don't be bias. is that statement somewhat legit?
is this a fair statement for me to say?
"A huge reason why the health care bill passed, is because Geroge W. Bush messed things up so bad, and gave away the seats in the house and senate to the dems?"
don't be bias. is that statement somewhat legit?
Wow, a new angle to "blame Bush".
Guns & God clinger-to'er.
Don't fall into the trap. This is Obama's baby now.
Guns & God clinger-to'er.
so wait, when W passed medicare part d with shaddy back room deals and a razor margin...that was legit. now when the current goon in chief does the same thing it is break out the don't tread on me flags.
give me a phuckin' break. either you think the gov't is to large and intrusive or you don't.
I'm far far far right
but it seems the "majority" of America thought Bush did horrible.
i want a yes or no to my question please!! no in between.
I know this is Obama's stuff.Originally Posted by SoonerBorn68
but is a big reason why Obama and his socialist crew could pass this bill b/c of W and his failures?
Good luck getting that from SoonerProphet......he usually let's the stick in his *** do the talkingI'm far far far right
but it seems the "majority" of America thought Bush did horrible.
i want a yes or no to my question please!! no in between.
OleVet Posse Instigator
I'm bascially saying Bush and Obama both suck as being president, economical wise
you are not going to get an argument from me there. seems as of late though that when dems are in office you at least know you are going to get a dry fist.
I'm bascially saying Bush and Obama both suck as being president, economical wise
i've told you before son, ain't interested, so quit hittin' on me fag.
I am not Republican and I would not say that. Don't get me wrong, I think the GW Bush administration will go down in history as being disastrous. He and the Democrat Congress sat around as US jobs were being exported overseas and Americans were making credit card payments by further leveraging off of their over-inflated house prices. Following that, there was no choice but in enact health care reform to take care of the ever increasing number of uninsured Americans. Adding in the problem of illegal immigrants, the health care system was just about to be overwhelmed anyway.
Chuck's version of Christmas is the Anti-SicEm-
SicEmBaylor
so will we now have a bunch of insured unemployed citizens? or does it not work like that?
not being sarcastic either
Bush did substantial social spending that was leftist behavior. (He was certainly not consistently conservative) Some congressional repubs went along with him. The MSM did their normal job, and voila, democrats got voted in, some of them pretending to be fiscally conservative. Had Bush not done the social spending, you could make a case that republicans in congress would have been more conservative, and would have retained control. The whole deal of McCain getting the R. nomination in '08 is another story, IMO.
Put a lid on it! Kiss it goodbye. We gave it away, and apparently thought it made sense to do so.
Hopefully. Although the numbers of newly unemployed seem to be slowing, I still do not believe that the overall job market will improve much over the next several years. Having health insurance is at least one less stress to the temporarily unemployed and not so taxing on our system with costs being passed on to those with insurance. Okay, it will still be passed on but at least now you kinda know what to expect.
Chuck's version of Christmas is the Anti-SicEm-
SicEmBaylor
Yes. Bush sucked. The Republicans could have enacted a conservative agenda while in control but really became mini-democrats. Libs hate them. Conservatives were discussed by them. So they lost a lot of seats for raising the national debt etc...
So 'yes'. This is accurate.
Had the Repubs been conservative as they pretended to be, this would have never happened.
Of course, if the Dems weren't far left nuts now and were moderate (as they pretend to be) this wouldn't have happened either.
Ive looked at many different websites that rank all time presidential performance and while he certainly wasnt at the top of any of the lists, he was more towards the middle-high 30s rank. It is so new for all of us that people like to throw out different statements but within the realm of history, he isnt as bad as many sayI'm far far far right
but it seems the "majority" of America thought Bush did horrible.
i want a yes or no to my question please!! no in between.
I think he did some good things but he will never get credit because of the level of screw ups he had
Ranger Reese of OVJ country, Patrollin tha hood.
I Survived Drunkytown with OleVet and all I got was this rash!
With a record of 109-23 (.826) and six Big 12 championships in 10 seasons, Stoops has reason to be arrogant. But he is not. He is somewhere between humble and unimpressed.
~ Ivan Maisel
http://sportslife11.blogspot.com/
I would have liked to see how Bush did if 9/11 never happened..... hell I know we all wish 9/11 never happened.
(and no I'm not saying Bush sucked just b/c of 9/11)
Speaking of Gadsden flags.
I have to admit that my political views have evolved over the last decade. I am no longer a Republican and for damn sure am not a Democrat. My goal is to be consistently anti-government now.
Harry, are you one of these guys?
Sorry, I ain't calling anybody out or commenting on the issue. I just thought the picture was funny and I wanted to put on here somewhere.
"Winning isn't everything, its the ONLY thing." - Vince Lombardi
Olevet Posse Member and OVJ-aholic
Harry, are you one of these guys?
Sorry, I ain't calling anybody out or commenting on the issue. I just thought the picture was funny and I wanted to put on here somewhere.
Somewhere in between, although I do own a pair of Doc Martens black steel toe boots.
Posting Permissions
