What i'm speaking of is, for example lets say for all the bad things that Clinton did(Somalia,failure to do anything about Bin Laden)he did create jobs/reduce the size of the federal government/and reduced the welfare rolls.....here comes W(who I elected two terms)makes swift changes which increases the size of government/unemployment goes up/people on welfare increase...then in comes Obama...who promises to undo the evils that W has done.
I believe in change, but everytime a new president enters the oval office and undoes what the previous administration has done.....are we actually getting somewhere? Or is this dictated by the current economy global and domestic?
I guess what i'm driving at is, wholesale changes to laws due to your parties stance on a particular issue seems rather petty, fluid changes would make for better government...not knee jerk reactions.
"I'm a dem, you republicans suck...i'm gonna raise taxes, spend spend spend"
"Now that that idiot is gone, i'm gonna change the way things are done around here...he had no idea what the hell he was doing"
i'm going back to bed, usually I stay our of political arguments but I just wanted a sincere answer why some administrations want to **** up the good things a previous president has done.