JSM or BHO ?
JSM or BHO ?
Quote
If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !
Where's the option for Jim Leher
OleVet Posse Instigator
Where's the option for I didn't watch (maybe 30 seconds) because I knew who I was gonna vote for months ago.
Behold the pale horse. The man who sat on him was death, and Hell followed with him.
Olevet Posse Pistolero
Winner of the Nobel Peace Prize 2015.
I vote BHO because he is better at the format of debate. People will respond more positively to his demeanor regardless of his words.
The SF.com Retard Remover...it makes the postards you have on ignore disappear completely:
http://173.203.71.50/sfcom_retard_remover.user.js
I say neither --- getting a straight answer from either has been damn near impossible.
Edit to Veritas: Not to say either was the winner, but to say BHO is a better debater when he is the one who was the first and most often to interrupt is a bit of a stretch to me.
I voted for JSM in this pole.
He blew me away tonight. Started well, faded a little in turn 3, and finished strong.
The SF.com Retard Remover...it makes the postards you have on ignore disappear completely:
http://173.203.71.50/sfcom_retard_remover.user.js
WOW - my wife and I were glued to the debate. McCain was absolutely amazing, IMO. No doubt that Obama is articulate and very well spoken - very polished, and McCain is a good ole boy. But McCain, to me, chewed up Obama and spit him out.
The SF.com Retard Remover...it makes the postards you have on ignore disappear completely:
http://173.203.71.50/sfcom_retard_remover.user.js
I'd say JSM. Obama didn't clean his debating clock like was expected. McCain did a lot better than most people thought he would.
Oh... you know...
I voted for JSM. I thought his depth of knowledge and experience came across well. I will say that BHO did a much better job of articulating his stance on foreign policy issues than I thought he would.
I think Veritas has a very valid point. The window dressing crowd will pick BHO because he does a better job of posturing himself and delivering his rhetoric IMO.
I'm actually looking forward to Sic'Em's take on this.
i listened on the radio and i don't think anyone "won" this...i think McCain will gain some points. but, McCain was particularly obvious talking in platitudes most of the time....and Obama repeating tired talking points, many times out of context.
on the radio Obama sounded uncomfortable and reaching for phrases like "as i said before" or "to say again" which are (in my experience as a public speaking kind of guy as a college teacher)...fillers we all use for nervousness or lost train of thought.
“someone's controlling the vibes!"--apache dropout
who debated?
Bazinga
Wonder who was closer to Kissinger's view about talking with leaders of non-ally countries without pre-conditions?
WOW i thot this would Go More as to whos voting fer who .
JSM schooled the Kid In FP and on the war
In MHO
Quote
If God wanted Men to look women in the eyes, He wouldnt have gave em Boobs !
It was a push. Veritas is absolutely correct that Obama scored points for just his appearance and fluid speech, which are more important than the substance of the speech. He seemed Presidential, which is something for which Obama had more to prove. McCain also looked and sounded good, probably better than I have ever seen him. Nobody cleaned anyone's clock.
On a much more important note, I discovered Blanton's bourbon is more to my liking than Woodford Reserve. Blanton's came across as smoother and more able to address my issues. Woodford just did not seem as congenial, much more harsh than Blanton's, which was crisp and smooth. Clear victory tonight for Blanton's. Both come with a big price tag and tax implications, but Blanton's won my vote tonight.