Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 49
  1. #1
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1 Whet's Avatar
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    3,113
    vCash
    500

    Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    From the NY Post:
    WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.
    According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

    "He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.

    Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."

    "However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.

    Though Obama claims the US presence is "illegal," he suddenly remembered that Americans troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a UN mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the "weakened Bush administration," Iraq should seek an extension of the UN mandate.

    While in Iraq, Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a "realistic withdrawal date." They declined.

    Obama has made many contradictory statements with regard to Iraq. His latest position is that US combat troops should be out by 2010. Yet his effort to delay an agreement would make that withdrawal deadline impossible to meet.

    Supposing he wins, Obama's administration wouldn't be fully operational before February - and naming a new ambassador to Baghdad and forming a new negotiation team might take longer still.

    By then, Iraq will be in the throes of its own campaign season. Judging by the past two elections, forming a new coalition government may then take three months. So the Iraqi negotiating team might not be in place until next June.

    Then, judging by how long the current talks have taken, restarting the process from scratch would leave the two sides needing at least six months to come up with a draft accord. That puts us at May 2010 for when the draft might be submitted to the Iraqi parliament - which might well need another six months to pass it into law.

    Thus, the 2010 deadline fixed by Obama is a meaningless concept, thrown in as a sop to his anti-war base.

    Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the Bush administration have a more flexible timetable in mind.

    According to Zebari, the envisaged time span is two or three years - departure in 2011 or 2012. That would let Iraq hold its next general election, the third since liberation, and resolve a number of domestic political issues.

    Even then, the dates mentioned are only "notional," making the timing and the cadence of withdrawal conditional on realities on the ground as appreciated by both sides.

    Iraqi leaders are divided over the US election. Iraqi President Jalal Talabani (whose party is a member of the Socialist International) sees Obama as "a man of the Left" - who, once elected, might change his opposition to Iraq's liberation. Indeed, say Talabani's advisers, a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his intervention transformed failure into success.

    Maliki's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic blunder in US history."
    Other prominent Iraqi leaders, such as Vice President Adel Abdul-Mahdi and Kurdish regional President Massoud Barzani, believe that Sen. John McCain would show "a more realistic approach to Iraqi issues."

    Obama has given Iraqis the impression that he doesn't want Iraq to appear anything like a success, let alone a victory, for America. The reason? He fears that the perception of US victory there might revive the Bush Doctrine of "pre-emptive" war - that is, removing a threat before it strikes at America.

    Despite some usual equivocations on the subject, Obama rejects pre-emption as a legitimate form of self -defense. To be credible, his foreign-policy philosophy requires Iraq to be seen as a failure, a disaster, a quagmire, a pig with lipstick or any of the other apocalyptic adjectives used by the American defeat industry in the past five years.

    Yet Iraq is doing much better than its friends hoped and its enemies feared. The UN mandate will be extended in December, and we may yet get an agreement on the status of forces before President Bush leaves the White House in January
    http://www.nypost.com/seven/09152008...150.htm?page=0

    Slimy "change merchant" that Barry Obama!
    Last edited by Whet; 9/15/2008 at 08:09 AM. Reason: formatting issues

  2. #2

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Those zany politicians!

  3. #3
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member Partial Qualifier's Avatar
    Location
    On the Cheap.
    Posts
    5,610
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Indeed, say Talabani's advisers, a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his intervention transformed failure into success.
    I accept many politicians are professional liars, but if this is true - going these extra miles to align the smoke & mirrors, in this circumstance - that's just disgusting.

  4. #4

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Quote Originally Posted by Partial Qualifier View Post
    I accept many politicians are professional liars, but if this is true - going these extra miles to align the smoke & mirrors, in this circumstance - that's just disgusting.
    Well, it looks like Bush is going to have a huge % of the troops either home or slaated to come home before the elections. That's gotta be making Obama's team lose sleep. I mean, when you're a one trick pony and your trick doesn't work anymore, what's next?

  5. #5
    Emma's Daddy! SoonerStormchaser's Avatar
    Location
    Norman
    Posts
    9,630
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Heh...I'm eagerly awaiting JM's spin on this.

  6. #6
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member Widescreen's Avatar
    Location
    NINJABREAD MAN!
    Posts
    15,089
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Quote Originally Posted by SoonerStormchaser View Post
    Heh...I'm eagerly awaiting JM's spin on this.
    OBAMA CAN DO WHATEVER HE WANTS! HE IS NOT GOVERNED BY THE RULES OF THE MORTAL!

  7. #7
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member achiro's Avatar
    Posts
    5,922
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    IF this is true, wow!

  8. #8
    Support Landry Jones! CK Sooner's Avatar
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,592
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    NoBama!

  9. #9

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Quote Originally Posted by SoonerStormchaser View Post
    Heh...I'm eagerly awaiting JM's spin on this.
    Eh, why spin this? Just tell it like it is.

  10. #10
    my post count betrays me leavingthezoo's Avatar
    Location
    somewhere between normal and insane. NINSANE!
    Posts
    3,099
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    i think our friend amir taheri has a history of making up stories. just sayin'...

    A Saturday editorial condemning Iran was based on a report in a Canadian newspaper that has since been discredited. In a story written by Iranian-born analyst Amir Taheri, the National Post reported that the Iranian Parliament had given preliminary approval to a law to require Jews and other religious minorities to wear colored patches of cloth, evoking memories of the Holocaust. The National Post has since backed off its story, quoting a number of sources, including the lone Jewish member of the Iranian Parliament, as denying that such a measure was passed.

    After the shocking story was published, a U.S. State Department spokesman said that such a law, if approved, would carry "clear echoes of Germany under Hitler.'' Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper was quoted as saying that Iran was "very capable'' of passing such a law, although he could not confirm that it had. Rabbi Marvin Hier, the dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, told the National Post he had no independent confirmation that such a law was approved but believes it was considered by the Parliament.

    A copy of the draft law obtained by the Associated Press did give preliminary approval to a law that would encourage Muslims to reject Western dress. The law would include economic incentives for local clothing manufacturers to offer Islamic-style attire and tariffs would be imposed on imports. But there was nothing in the draft of the law to require Jews and Christians to wear colored insignias.

    For our part, we owe our readers an explanation - not excuses. In retrospect, we should have been more skeptical of the report and more diligent in our efforts to verify it.
    http://www.sptimes.com/2006/05/23/Op...ran_stor.shtml

    that's just one example. but don't you boys worry. this one hasn't been debunked yet so you still got that to cling to.


  11. #11
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member achiro's Avatar
    Posts
    5,922
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Quote Originally Posted by leavingthezoo View Post
    i think our friend amir taheri has a history of making up stories. just sayin'...


    http://www.sptimes.com/2006/05/23/Op...ran_stor.shtml

    that's just one example. but don't you boys worry. this one hasn't been debunked yet so you still got that to cling to.

    Which is why I said "if this is true"
    But if it is true, a sitting senator speaking unofficially to a foreign government in regards to altering the timeframe/outcome of a war...isn't that illegal?

  12. #12
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member JohnnyMack's Avatar
    Location
    pale blue dot
    Posts
    22,422
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    I don't think anyone is stupid enough to think that BHO had anything to do with or would accept credit for "victory" in Iraq.

    This article seems to have a lot of speculation in it.
    Atheist.

  13. #13
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1
    Location
    Doomhammer
    Posts
    4,910
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Quote Originally Posted by achiro View Post
    Which is why I said "if this is true"
    But if it is true, a sitting senator speaking unofficially to a foreign government in regards to altering the timeframe/outcome of a war...isn't that illegal?
    Depends, saying that you favor an extended period of time to push for a new administration to make major changes on a foreign policy front (even with foreign dignitaries) is dramatically different from holding talks with a foreign government in regards to realpolitik.

    Taheri has a major ax to grind and is funded by neoconservative thinktanks to push a message, I would take anything he writes, especially in regards to US Democratic politics with a teaspoon of salt.
    Boomer Sooner

  14. #14
    Moderator


    Location
    Husker HQ (Lincoln)
    Posts
    9,281
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    I'm going to side with cuba on this one. Taheri has a history of being a fibber.
    The SF.com Retard Remover...it makes the postards you have on ignore disappear completely:
    http://173.203.71.50/sfcom_retard_remover.user.js

  15. #15
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    15,968
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Obama better hope this isn't true. Looks like there is a law against this kind of thing...

    http://www.historycentral.com/NN/Logan.html

    Even if its 100% BS, its clear The One would rather win an election, than win a war.

  16. #16
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1 SoonerProphet's Avatar
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Posts
    3,883
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Didn't Reagan violate the Logan Act too? Proof yet again that politicians are co*cksuckers.

  17. #17
    Mmm... ...ribs.

    BigRedJed's Avatar
    Location
    Keepin' it Crippin' in the 405
    Posts
    18,813
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Well, I'm no expert on the Logan act, but that link says "Congress passed legislation outlawing such contacts between foreign governments and private individuals." Now, I'm thinking "private individuals" eliminates Obama, at the very least, who is a United States Senator. I assume Prophet is talking about the Iran hostage situation, and I don't know specifics on that. Perhaps the fact that he was Governor of California or President Elect might change his "private individual" status. Again, I'm unsure.

    There certainly might be (in fact probably is) some other law that keeps U.S. Senators from negotiating with foreign governments outside the realm of the State Department. But based on the description in that link, it doesn't sound like the Logan Act applies.
    Well, crap.

  18. #18
    Sooner All-Big XII-2-1+1-1+1 SoonerProphet's Avatar
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Posts
    3,883
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedJed View Post
    Well, I'm no expert on the Logan act, but that link says "Congress passed legislation outlawing such contacts between foreign governments and private individuals." Now, I'm thinking "private individuals" eliminates Obama, at the very least, who is a United States Senator. I assume Prophet is talking about the Iran hostage situation, and I don't know specifics on that. Perhaps the fact that he was Governor of California or President Elect might change his "private individual" status. Again, I'm unsure.

    There certainly might be (in fact probably is) some other law that keeps U.S. Senators from negotiating with foreign governments outside the realm of the State Department. But based on the description in that link, it doesn't sound like the Logan Act applies.
    It is all a bunch of election bs. Shenanigans about Reagan's "October surprise" and the release of the Iranian hostages is almost a conspirational as this. Hell, Congresional delegations sell out to Israel, Cuba, Georgia, you name it, weekly.

  19. #19
    SoonerFans.com Elite Member
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    15,968
    vCash
    500

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    No, Algeria brokered the hostage deal with Iran, not Reagan.

    This would be about 1000% worse than trying to get hostages released anyways.

    If The One somehow gets elected, and this turns out to be true, his Presidency may be very short due to his impeachment over this.

    And yes, it would be THAT serious.

  20. #20

    Re: Obama secretly tries to stall troop withdraw!

    Quote Originally Posted by OklahomaTuba View Post

    And yes, it would be THAT serious.
    Indeed. It may seem like a little thing now but this could very well be the proverbial straw on Obama's back.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •