PDA

View Full Version : Will we see another 300 win pitcher?



Collier11
8/9/2007, 02:34 PM
These are the players who I think have a legit shot and where I think they will end up in a broad sense...if I forgot anyone feel free to add to the list. The names highlighted are the ones I really think will do it if anyone


Close but no cigar

Randy Johnson-284 wins, if he could put together 2 more healthy seasons yes but that is asking alot, I say NO

Mike Mussina-246 wins, he is 39 yrs old and would need to avg 15 wins a season for 3 1/2 more years. NO

Andy Pettite-194 wins, only 35 so he would need to avg about 15 wins for 7 more years, I say NO

Moyer and Wells, no shot


Current younger pitchers

Good shot if healthy

Sabathia-95 wins, 27 yrs old
Zambrano-78 wins, 26 yrs old
Oswalt-110 wins, 29 yrs old
Peavy-69 wins, 26 yrs old
Santana-90 wins, 28 yrs old
Buerhle-106 wins, 28 yrs old

Big number but wont get there
Beckett-71 wins, 27 yrs old
Halladay-108 wins, 30 yrs old
Penny-85 wins, 29 yrs old
Hudson-131 wins, 32 yrs old
Lowe-108 wins, 34 yrs old
Zito-110 wins, 29 yrs old
Garland-90 wins, 28 yrs old
L.Hernandez-130 wins, 32 yrs old
M.Morris-118 wins, 33 yrs old
D.Willis-65 wins, 26 yrs old
Colon-146 wins, 34 yrs old
Mulder-103 wins, 30 yrs old

Really young, but has a shot if they dont flame out

Hamels-21 wins, 23 years old
Verlander-28 wins, 24 yrs old
Kazmir-30 wins, 23 yrs old
F. Hernandez-24 wins, 21 yrs old

Scott D
8/9/2007, 02:38 PM
no, thx for playing.

Collier11
8/9/2007, 03:34 PM
Glad to see the all-knowing Scott D has blessed us with the answer, lock the thread now ;)

royalfan5
8/9/2007, 10:20 PM
Since wins are a fairly poor method of evaluating a pitchers performance, I think we marks for pitchers should be deemphasized.