PDA

View Full Version : Reggie Bush settles lawsuit



Keyser
4/13/2007, 06:05 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?slug=ys-bush041307&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

AN DIEGO – Michael Michaels, one of the financiers of failed marketing agency New Era Sports & Entertainment, reached a settlement with Reggie Bush's family Thursday over unpaid rent and other benefits allegedly provided in an attempt to woo the former University of Southern California running back as a client.

The settlement, first reported on the San Diego Union Tribune Web site, was for between $200,000 and $300,000, sources told Yahoo! Sports.

Bush's attorney, David Cornwell, could not be reached for comment. Michaels' attorney, Jordan Cohen, declined to comment other than to say that Michaels would not be pursuing a lawsuit against Bush.

The NCAA and Pacific-10 Conference are conducting on-going investigations into allegations by Michaels and former New Era partner Lloyd Lake that Bush and his family received cash and benefits from the agency while Bush, now with the New Orleans Saints, was playing at USC.

If the NCAA determines Bush and his family received the extra financial benefits, USC could be forced to forfeit games in which Bush played and his Heisman Trophy could be in jeopardy.

Michaels and Lake have been key figures in the NCAA's investigation into Bush, whose family lived rent-free for almost a year in a $757,237, 3,002 square-foot Spring Valley, Calif., house Michaels said he purchased for the family in April of 2005. Michaels' former attorney, Brian Watkins, said the house and other benefits were given to Bush as part of an agreement the USC star and his family had to work with New Era when Bush went to the NFL. Bush ultimately signed with contract agent Joel Segal and marketing rep Mike Ornstein. Ornstein is also alleged to have given Bush and his family benefits while he was at USC.

According to two sources, Michaels' settlement includes a confidentiality clause which will keep Michaels from talking with the NCAA.

Watkins, who still represents Lake. said Michaels' settlement did not impact Lake's plans to go forward with his lawsuit against the Bush family. Watkins expects the suit to be filed in the next few weeks.

"I'm in the middle of a trial that should end by next Tuesday or Wednesday,” Watkins said. “I would think two weeks after that."

Watkins said he had not discussed a possible settlement with Cornwell "anytime recently." He left open the possibility of a settlement.

"We're reasonable people" Watkins said. "We'll listen to whatever someone has to say."

Watkins said he could call Michaels as a witness.

"Michael has said he'd be willing to be a witness," Watkins said.

Any confidentiality agreement would not prevent his cooperation, Watkins said.

"No confidentiality agreement trumps a subpoena."

Lake and Michaels had hired Watkins and initially planned on filing a joint lawsuit against Bush in May of 2006. But Michaels later decided to go with separate legal representation and the suit was divided.

The threat of lawsuits has slowed the NCAA's probe and some of the parties allegedly involved, including Bush, have failed to cooperate thoroughly.

Rachel Newman Baker, the NCAA Director of Agent, Gambling and Amateurism Activities issued a statement regarding the investigation Friday.

“The NCAA is aware that Mr. Michaels has agreed to a settlement with the Bush family. We continue our efforts to obtain cooperation from those involved with the case, including Reggie Bush and his family. Hopefully, the settlement agreement will encourage individuals who previously refused to cooperate due to concerns about potential litigation to now come forward with information that may assist with our on-going investigation.”

An NCAA spokesman said the organization has made two requests to interview Bush via his attorney and followed up with a written request.

That would conflict with what Bush, who visited USC football practice this week, told the Los Angeles Times.

"They (the NCAA) haven't tried to contact me,” Bush said. "If they did I wouldn't answer the phone."
Jason Cole and Charles Robinson are the national NFL writers for Yahoo! Sports. Send Jason or Charles a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.

oumartin
4/13/2007, 06:30 PM
just glad they didnt' do anything illegal while at USC! :D

soonerboy_odanorth
4/13/2007, 06:37 PM
And we're accused of "failure to monitor"???

I said it before, and I'll say it again.... If we're guilty of "failure to monitor", then just WTF is this?

Looks like our crime should be re-titled: "Failed Monitoring".

Southern Cal's crime looks like: "Failure to Attempt to Monitor."

What a joke.

Say buh-bye to the crystal football, SoCal.

And P.S. We don't want it. Ship it to Auburn.

the dude
4/13/2007, 06:56 PM
Yeah, but see, they didn't have any way of knowning about...... HEY EVERYONE - LOOK OVER THERE AT WILL FERREL DOING SOMETHING FUNNY!!

This entire town is made of teflon. Every part of it. Nobody is accountable for anything and it's disgusting. Catholic Cardinals shuffle around known child molesters. City attorney is about as competant as i am at spelinz. People like paris hilton live here. Do i need to go on?

It wouldn't surprise me in the least to see us get handed more penalties than these guys. I'm not a doom and gloom - consipracy, they're out to get us type, but programs like USC, OSU, and ut just seem to be exempt. Any investigating going on about the chain gang ut is calling their running backs? Any need to look and see what Troy Smith was doing? Nah.. just read over what they gave 'em and the NCAA will call it good.

MamaMia
4/13/2007, 09:00 PM
If those jerks at the NCAA sanction us and fail to sanction USC, or even if they just give them a slap on the wrist, Alabama and Oklahoma should file a joint law suit against them.

Ash
4/13/2007, 09:21 PM
the talking heads are mentioning that the NCAA investigation hasn't been able to move because of the pending lawsuits...let the investigation begin...

Seamus
4/13/2007, 09:48 PM
According to two sources, Michaels' settlement includes a confidentiality clause which will keep Michaels from talking with the NCAA.


This, if true, is appalling.

insuranceman_22
4/13/2007, 10:32 PM
If those jerks at the NCAA sanction us and fail to sanction USC, or even if they just give them a slap on the wrist, Alabama and Oklahoma should file a joint law suit against them.

From what our Sooner Pres. has said, that may very well be a possibility. Hope it doesn't come to that, but.........

Ash
4/13/2007, 10:39 PM
The condifentiality clause might be true, but I have a hard time believing that would be part of a settlement between Bush and Michaels unless Bush's attorney also reps USC.

Wishboned
4/13/2007, 10:41 PM
This, if true, is appalling.

When I read the article that's the thing that stood out the most.

MamaMia
4/14/2007, 09:33 AM
From what our Sooner Pres. has said, that may very well be a possibility. Hope it doesn't come to that, but.........What did he say?

Frozen Sooner
4/14/2007, 10:38 AM
The condifentiality clause might be true, but I have a hard time believing that would be part of a settlement between Bush and Michaels unless Bush's attorney also reps USC.

It's pretty common for a settlement agreement to have a blanket gag associated with it so that you can't discuss the terms of the settlement with anyone. This supposedly prevents frivolous lawsuits from being spawned in the wake of a legitimate one-"Oh, look, he was willing to pay $1,000,000 to settle this one-I'll bet he'd be willing to pay $5k to make one go away!"

Ash
4/14/2007, 11:01 AM
It's pretty common for a settlement agreement to have a blanket gag associated with it so that you can't discuss the terms of the settlement with anyone. This supposedly prevents frivolous lawsuits from being spawned in the wake of a legitimate one-"Oh, look, he was willing to pay $1,000,000 to settle this one-I'll bet he'd be willing to pay $5k to make one go away!"

OK, but I'd assume that, unless Bush or his reps intentionally wanted to cover USC as well, the blanket gag would specifically involve the terms and conditions of Bush's settlement with Michaels - and maybe this would prevent them from answering NCAA questions, but I imagine there would still be some questions that could be answered.

Could the NCAA lawyers request documents pertaining to the case if necessary?

Also, isn't there an extortion investigation as well? Could documents/info from that be used?

fadada1
4/14/2007, 03:45 PM
"The NCAA and Pacific-10 Conference are conducting on-going investigations into allegations..."

comedic gold!!!!

Fraggle145
4/14/2007, 04:25 PM
From what our Sooner Pres. has said, that may very well be a possibility. Hope it doesn't come to that, but.........

linky? :pop:

Vaevictis
4/14/2007, 04:48 PM
The condifentiality clause might be true, but I have a hard time believing that would be part of a settlement between Bush and Michaels unless Bush's attorney also reps USC.

No, Bush has his own reasons for wanting to keep him quiet. Would you want to have a guy testifying to things that could cost you an MNC and a Heisman?

Ash
4/14/2007, 08:33 PM
No, Bush has his own reasons for wanting to keep him quiet. Would you want to have a guy testifying to things that could cost you an MNC and a Heisman?

Yeah, I thought of that...but why would he care about that now? He's a star in the league, making millions, making a new name for himself on a new level. He doesn't strike me as the sentimental, rah rah for alma mater type.

Vaevictis
4/14/2007, 09:12 PM
Yeah, I thought of that...but why would he care about that now? He's a star in the league, making millions, making a new name for himself on a new level. He doesn't strike me as the sentimental, rah rah for alma mater type.

It's an NC and a freaking Heisman trophy. He gets the NFL money either way, but a legacy's worth something too. If he can do something to protect that legacy, why wouldn't he?

Ash
4/14/2007, 09:23 PM
It's an NC and a freaking Heisman trophy. He gets the NFL money either way, but a legacy's worth something too. If he can do something to protect that legacy, why wouldn't he?

You're assuming he cares about that or is looking forward to that.

Most people would, but this guy's been handed accolades since he was in Pee-Wee football. It might not mean as much as getting paid and getting his right now.

SoonerGirl06
4/14/2007, 09:24 PM
It's an NC and a freaking Heisman trophy. He gets the NFL money either way, but a legacy's worth something too. If he can do something to protect that legacy, why wouldn't he?

If he was concerned about protecting his legacy, he wouldn't have done the things he's accused of doing... nor would he have let his parents done them as well.

It's all about the money with Bush. Nothing else and nothing more. To me that makes him about the lowest form of a person out there.

Seamus
4/14/2007, 09:36 PM
If he was concerned about protecting his legacy, he wouldn't have done the things he's accused of doing... nor would he have let his parents done them as well.

It's all about the money with Bush. Nothing else and nothing more. To me that makes him about the lowest form of a person out there.


Finally! Someone comes out and says it! http://www.soonerfans.com/forums/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif

Totally agree with you. Everyone is, "Ooh, but he's a great player!" Maybe, but he's a dirtbag too. Not trying to claim moral superiority, but a line has to be drawn somewhere, just sayin' ...

Vaevictis
4/14/2007, 09:47 PM
You're assuming he cares about that or is looking forward to that.

shrug, he might be, he might not. I'm not really assuming that he is, I'm just saying it's possible.


If he was concerned about protecting his legacy, he wouldn't have done the things he's accused of doing... nor would he have let his parents done them as well.

Maybe he's more concerned about making money, but now that money isn't much of an issue to him, maybe the legacy is a little more important than it used to be.

Besides, if he was going to have to pay the guy anyway, it doesn't really cost him extra to throw a gag agreement into the settlement.

Ash
4/14/2007, 09:50 PM
shrug, he might be, he might not. I'm not really assuming that he is, I'm just saying it's possible.

It's definitely possible.

He just doesn't strike me as one of those kinds of guys. I'm sure he takes pride in his accomplishments, but I also get the impression he'd just as soon trade the Heisman for a new promo deal.

Vaevictis
4/14/2007, 09:53 PM
I suspect he would. But the fact is, that's not a trade off he has to make. He's got the money now, and it costs him little or nothing to try to stymie investigators in this way. He might as well do it, right?

He might not worry about it, but he's probably got a sleaze bag agent who knows that there's money to be made off of a Heisman trophy and an NC once the NFL career dies down.

Ash
4/14/2007, 09:57 PM
I suspect he would. But the fact is, that's not a trade off he has to make. He's got the money now, and it costs him little or nothing to try to stymie investigators in this way. He might as well do it, right?

He might not worry about it, but he's probably got a sleaze bag agent who knows that there's money to be made off of a Heisman trophy and an NC once the NFL career dies down.

That's true.

It's pure speculation on my part, I just don't see him as being someone who is thinking of his legacy.

If he was, I don't think he'd do the jackassery that he does when he scores a touchdown.

SoonerRoads
4/15/2007, 08:15 AM
"The NCAA and Pacific-10 Conference are conducting on-going investigations into allegations..."

comedic gold!!!!


Yeah, just like the screwed up calls at the Oregon game. I am sure they will do their normal great job.

Just my take.

MamaMia
4/15/2007, 09:54 AM
Why hasn't the NCAA scheduled a meeting with USC to discuss in length, their failure to monitor their players?

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
4/15/2007, 12:05 PM
Why hasn't the NCAA scheduled a meeting with USC to discuss in length, their failure to monitor their players?They are gilded greatness, ALMOST in the same league as the domer.

MiccoMacey
4/15/2007, 01:08 PM
Why hasn't the NCAA scheduled a meeting with USC to discuss in length, their failure to monitor their players?

They have to await the outcome of the litigation between Bush and the other guy.

Then, they need to come hard. Especially with Bush's laisse faire attitude about them.

For all that I hate the NCAA, don't disrespect them like Bush is doing. They will find a way to come at you even harder. Right or wrong, they are a vindictive group.

SoonerRoads
4/15/2007, 01:31 PM
Why hasn't the NCAA scheduled a meeting with USC to discuss in length, their failure to monitor their players?

Because it is USC........the golden boys of the west coast......how could the NCAA ever say that they(USC) ever did anything wrong? National Championships back to back, Heisman winners back to back..........it is like the NCAA thinks they are immune to being questioned about their organizational control, or the lack thereof. Ohhhhhhhh, but they will come after us and if they do.......I hope Boren goes after them and their lack of consistency in dealing out their so-called, "justice".

Just my take.