PDA

View Full Version : Serious question



John Kochtoston
1/31/2007, 05:41 PM
As many of you know, Miss Oklahoma won the Miss America pageant earlier this week. She is the second Miss Okla. to win in as many years, and she beat Miss Texas to do it.
As most of you also know, we've lost the football game to Texas for the last two years.
So, my question is this: Is it more important for Brad Henry, David Boren, etc. to devote resources towards maintaining our superiority in hot chicks, or towards regaining superiority in football?

jacru
1/31/2007, 05:44 PM
I'm sorry. I can't take that question seriously. :D

GottaHavePride
1/31/2007, 05:45 PM
It depends. Does Brad Henry believe in a trickle-down theory of hawtie-nomics? heh.

proud gonzo
1/31/2007, 05:46 PM
i think it's better if I pretend that post isn't there.

GottaHavePride
1/31/2007, 05:49 PM
I just meant, does a more attractive Miss Oklahoma in turn raise the attractiveness of the average Oklahoma girl? Because in that case, losing one football game a year MIGHT be acceptable.

And yes, I thought I'd see just how far wrong this thread could go. ;)

yermom
1/31/2007, 06:10 PM
one game or THAT game?

big difference :D

hawtie-nomics, nice

JohnnyMack
1/31/2007, 06:14 PM
Bewbs.

Does this new chick have a nice rack?

soonerboomer93
1/31/2007, 06:17 PM
I don't live in Oklahoma, so it's perfectly for us to win the football game

crawfish
1/31/2007, 06:20 PM
I've gotta believe it's good for recruiting, though. :texan:

OUTromBoNado
1/31/2007, 08:47 PM
This thread is worthless without pics.

soonerboomer93
1/31/2007, 09:21 PM
I've gotta believe it's good for recruiting, though. :texan:

we can always work on recruiting hot chics

or maybe just clone them