Rama-Lama-Bama

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

Barach O-BAMA will accept the HC job at Bammer as a leadership stepping stone for his inevitable run for POTUS. Bammer pres. Lyle(Little Bear) Bryant confirmed the hiring today, saying "it was a natural selection for us." We passed on the hiring of Sylvester Crooms(sp.?) but with a name like Barach has (Hussein O Bama), felt it was a sign from allah.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

Woops, shoulda put this one on the football board.

[Frozen Sooner]

Yeah, it'd be much less stupider than a sack of *******s there.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

Yeah, it'd be much less stupider than a sack of *******s there.You co** ies just can't resist the name-calling, can you?

[Frozen Sooner]

Who got called a name?

[OCUDad]

Apparently it's OK to compare Obama to a radical Muslim, but not to call the ***hole who does it an ***hole.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

Who got called a name?I should be as happy with "stupid" and "sack of *******s" as you are with "co**ie"?

[Frozen Sooner]

Did I call you stupid or a sack of *******s? No, I said your post was stupider than a sack of *******s. Which it is.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

Apparently it's OK to compare Obama to a radical Muslim, but not to call the ***hole who does it an ***hole.One would wonder how long it will take for the MSM to consider the importance of his middle name. It IS a curiousity, doncha think?(BTW, thanks for the name-calling. I knew you were up to it)

[Frozen Sooner]

Oh, holy crap! Keith Nichol's last name is sort of like Terry Nichols'! He's probably a terrorist!

[OCUDad]

BTW, thanks for the name-calling. I knew you were up to itYou're welcome. I thought you might be uncomfortable with a double standard.

[Scott D]

One would wonder how long it will take for the MSM to consider the importance of his middle name. It IS a curiousity, doncha think?(BTW, thanks for the name-calling. I knew you were up to it)

Just when one thinks you couldn't stoop to stupider posts, you never fail to deliver.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

Just when one thinks you couldn't stoop to stupider posts, you never fail to deliver.It's just that you lefties can't take a joke.

[Scott D]

or that you are to jokes, what stephen hawking is to athletic achievement.

[proud gonzo]

um... so it matters that he has the same name as his father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., who is from Kenya?

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

um... so it matters that he has the same name as his father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., who is from Kenya?If Mitt Romney, for example, had a middle name "Hussein", do you think the MSM would ignore it like they are with Obama? Just pointing out the double standard that was mentioned in an earlier post in this thread.

[BoogercountySooner]

WGAS!

[proud gonzo]

If Mitt Romney, for example, had a middle name "Hussein", do you think the MSM would ignore it like they are with Obama? Just pointing out the double standard that was mentioned in an earlier post in this thread.I might care if I knew who the **** that was.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

I might care if I knew who the **** that was.Haha

[Scott D]

I might care if I knew who the **** that was.

Wonder how the unnamed thread starter here would think if Romney's middle name was Hitler.

[proud gonzo]

Hahaunlike some people, I don't get my panties in a wad over politics.

[proud gonzo]

My great grandfather's name was Adolf. big f-ing deal. Hussein is a common name.

[Hatfield]

in the hierarchy of smack should middle name smack be considered just above or just below grammar smack?

seriously? you honestly think the msm is "ignoring" the fact his middle name is hussein....what about his middle name makes it a story worthy of ignoring?

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

in the hierarchy of smack should middle name smack be considered just above or just below grammar smack?

seriously? you honestly think the msm is "ignoring" the fact his middle name is hussein....what about his middle name makes it a story worthy of ignoring?Please reread post #16. TYVM

[proud gonzo]

perhaps because it's just a name.
what about his middle name makes it worthy of talking about? Here's the news story:

"Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein. His father's middle name was also Hussein. 'Hussein' happens to be the surname of a very bad dude. It also happens to be a very common name."

who gives a ****?

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

perhaps because it's just a name.
what about his middle name makes it worthy of talking about? Here's the news story:

"Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein. His father's middle name was also Hussein. 'Hussein' happens to be the surname of a very bad dude. It also happens to be a very common name."

who gives a ****?The subject is not the name. It is the MSM. You might want to care about their irresponsibility...or not.

[Frozen Sooner]

I refuse to vote for Mitt Romney because I don't like baseball and his last name is sort of like an old character in Marvel comics who was an alien that went around killing people claiming they were "Dire Wraiths."

I can't believe the mainstream media isn't making an issue over this.

[proud gonzo]

The subject is not the name. It is the MSM. You might want to care about their irresponsibility...or not.I'm a journalism major, dude. And I think a big problem of the MSM is that they often get hung up on irrelevant little details like someone's frickin middle name. :rolleyes:

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

I'm a journalism major, dude. And I think a big problem of the MSM is that they often get hung up on irrelevant little details like someone's frickin middle name. :rolleyes:WADR, I don't think you are addressing the point.(could it be you just don't like the point, and are intentionally changing it?)

[Frozen Sooner]

William Shakespeare, folks. Proud member of the liberal mainstream media:

"What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

[Hatfield]

Please reread post #16. TYVM

ok i reread it...and it still doesn't make sense. care to enlighten me with what you are trying to say?

you seem to be implying that if a white repub. had the middle name hussein then the msm would be all over it and thus since a black dem does have that middle name and they are not all over it there is some sort of double standard.

really really hoping that is not what you are trying to say.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

ok i reread it...and it still doesn't make sense. care to enlighten me with what you are trying to say?

you seem to be implying that if a white repub. had the middle name hussein then the msm would be all over it and thus since a black dem does have that middle name and they are not all over it there is some sort of double standard.

really really hoping that is not what you are trying to say.You are close to getting it right. It has nothing to do with race. The rest is correct. It's purely political by the MSM.

[Hatfield]

ok i will try again since you seem to be avoiding coming out and saying whatever it is you are trying to say.

you are saying that in and of itself, with no other action or inaction required, the name hussein is newsworthy enough to hold the focus of the msm's attention...but since the individual that has the name is a dem it is being "ignored"

that it in a nutshell?

because you would have to understand why people on both sides of the aisle would think that reasoning is insane....

[proud gonzo]

show me another instance where they made a big deal out of a name like that and maybe you'll have some semblance to a point.

[OklaPony]

show me another instance where they made a big deal out of a name like that and maybe you'll have some semblance to a point.
George Herbert Walker Bush

We heard this a lot during his last campaign however we rarely heard Bill Clinton referred to by his full name. (William Jefferson Blythe(?) Clinton)

[Hatfield]

is cnn not the msm?? because you know they did a story on this yesterday right??

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

show me another instance where they made a big deal out of a name like that and maybe you'll have some semblance to a point.No, wait... I'm wrong. No way the MSM would dwell on anything, however serious or insignificant, or even erroneous or misleading, when discussing a Republican candidate, since they don't do that for dims.(pls. reread post #16 in this thread.)

[OklaPony]

is cnn not the msm?? because you know they did a story on this yesterday right??
If the question is directed at me then the answer is no, I didn't know anything about a CNN story yesterday.

[SoonerInKCMO]

George Herbert Walker Bush

We heard this a lot during his last campaign however we rarely heard Bill Clinton referred to by his full name. (William Jefferson Blythe(?) Clinton)

You're joking right?

[Hatfield]

it wasn't directed at you oklapony, but the cnn story is drawing some fire from the left due to the split screens of obama and osama and obama and sadaam.

story is said to be meant tongue in cheek, but really just shows how politically ignorant a lot of america is when it comes down to it.


and rush is my clone...your post in #16 makes no sense quit pointing back to it and simply explain yourself....and feel free to comment on the story that aired yesterday on the subject that you claim is being ignored.

[Partial Qualifier]

much less stupider than a sack of *******s

^^
the only worthwhile reading in this thread

[Ike]

William Shakespeare, folks. Proud member of the liberal mainstream media:

"What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."


what do you expect from a man who had men play the roles of women in his plays. hmmmmm?

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

and rush is my clone...your post in #16 makes no sense quit pointing back to it and simply explain yourself....and feel free to comment on the story that aired yesterday on the subject that you claim is being ignored.Sorry, I read it again, and it still seems clear, not confusing.
Of course you realize that even when the msm does touch on anything potentially controversial in connection with a dim, they don't try to destroy. Instead, put it in a comical light(laugh with me, not at me type of comedy). But, you know that. You just don't want to admit it.

[sooner_born_1960]

^^
the only worthwhile reading in this thread
I was wondering about that. How do you have a sack full of holes? You must be including the sphincter.

[Hatfield]

what would you like them to say then?

[OklaPony]

You're joking right?
Nope.

I posted this only in reference to the use, or lack thereof, of full names. One of my recollections of the 1992 campaign was the Democratic Party tactic of consistently having The President referred to in this fashion, apparently playing on the idea that a 4 part name was aristocratic and out of touch with us "common folk". My impression is that some of the major media often referred to him the same way whilst using the same reference to Bill Clinton much more sparingly.

I don't have empirical data to back this up, it's just my recollection and opinion.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

what would you like them to say then?Something like " Dim Senator Barach Obama is a rising star in left-wing circles. His socialist positions are either going over with the dim faithful, or he's just so damn sexy to the women who vote for that reason. And/or, he's the hot ticket right now. Look out, Bill(er, ah)Hillary. He will appeal to the multi-cultural folks, as well. His middle name is the common "Hussein" in the Moslem world."
In short, the MSM can be positive, without being misleading.

[Ike]

Nope.

I posted this only in reference to the use, or lack thereof, of full names. One of my recollections of the 1992 campaign was the Democratic Party tactic of consistently having The President referred to in this fashion, apparently playing on the idea that a 4 part name was aristocratic and out of touch with us "common folk". My impression is that some of the major media often referred to him the same way whilst using the same reference to Bill Clinton much more sparingly.

I don't have empirical data to back this up, it's just my recollection and opinion.

I always figured the Herbert part was to distinguish him from his son...

Personally, I think calling him George Herbert Walker Bush gives an impression of greater distinction....but thats probably because I too have a 4 part name.

[Hatfield]

i think barrack said it best when he said american's don't care about middle names.

seriously...take a step back and look at why you are so up in arms that people aren't going out of their way to say his middle name.

nobody is hiding it....it is a non issue....and you can't accept that. You want it out there because you seemingly hope it will hurt him somehow by playing on the ignorance of americans

your position is also hurt when you claim it is being ignored and i told you where cnn ran a story on this very subject.

your position on this is quite odd.

[sitzpinkler]

Sorry, I read it again, and it still seems clear, not confusing.
Of course you realize that even when the msm does touch on anything potentially controversial in connection with a dim, they don't try to destroy. Instead, put it in a comical light(laugh with me, not at me type of comedy). But, you know that. You just don't want to admit it.

This must be a joke?!?

His middle name is of no consequence. What in the hell are you on?

[Scott D]

This must be a joke?!?

His middle name is of no consequence. What in the hell are you on?

oxycotin...he got scrips from 4 different doctors and went to 3 different pharmacies.

[KC//CRIMSON]

Who got called a name?

You did, cookie.;)

[OklaPony]

I always figured the Herbert part was to distinguish him from his son...

Personally, I think calling him George Herbert Walker Bush gives an impression of greater distinction....but thats probably because I too have a 4 part name.
You're correct in that they did and still do use his full name to distinguish him from the current President but in 1992 there was no other George Bush involved in presidential politics and thus no reason to do so. George W. Bush wasn't even the Governor of Saxet at the time.

[Gandalf_The_Grey]

What part of Obama voting against giving Low Income House a larger electricity alottment, what part of Obama asking that we cut 100 Million dollars in pork in order to help offset the Katrina relief effort lead you to believe he is a socialist. You have said yourself you aren't going to read his voting records or anything about him, yet you act like you are so educated on him to label him a socialist. As for socialism, you throw that out for every democrat like it is true....what are you? An Anarchist...do you want to stop paying taxes and have absolutely no government control. If you are going to label everyone to an extreme, I think it is only fair we label you to some extreme.

[Ike]

What part of Obama voting against giving Low Income House a larger electricity alottment, what part of Obama asking that we cut 100 Million dollars in pork in order to help offset the Katrina relief effort lead you to believe he is a socialist. You have said yourself you aren't going to read his voting records or anything about him, yet you act like you are so educated on him to label him a socialist. As for socialism, you throw that out for every democrat like it is true....what are you? An Anarchist...do you want to stop paying taxes and have absolutely no government control. If you are going to label everyone to an extreme, I think it is only fair we label you to some extreme.

He damn sure isn't my brand of extremism(which I can tell just by his middle name), which must mean he is either the other brand of extremism or just to chicken to take sides! [/wf]

[Scott D]

You're correct in that they did and still do use his full name to distinguish him from the current President but in 1992 there was no other George Bush involved in presidential politics and thus no reason to do so. George W. Bush wasn't even the Governor of Saxet at the time.

It's my understanding that it was done as a thing of respect. Similar to how on more than one occasion they did refer to his predecessor as Ronald Wilson Reagan.

but according to rlimc(aka wf) Reagan never should have been elected because he ended up sharing his middle name with a known liberal volleyball with a handprint for a face that kept Tom Hanks company on a deserted island.

[Gandalf_The_Grey]

http://www.thx-trailer.com/replica/wilson2.JPG=Socialist

[Ike]

http://www.thx-trailer.com/replica/wilson2.JPG=Socialist

It's obvious from the hair.


dirty hippie volleyball.

[OklaPony]

It's my understanding that it was done as a thing of respect...
It would have been respect had they practiced this during his entire presidency.


...Similar to how on more than one occasion they did refer to his predecessor as Ronald Wilson Reagan...
Reagan, however had absolutely no chance whatsoever to lose either of his elections. His real name could've been Stalin, been referred to as such on a daily basis, and it wouldn't have mattered a bit.


...but according to rlimc(aka wf) Reagan never should have been elected because he ended up sharing his middle name with a known liberal volleyball with a handprint for a face that kept Tom Hanks company on a deserted island.
ROTFLMAO!!!

[SoonerInKCMO]

Nope.

I posted this only in reference to the use, or lack thereof, of full names. One of my recollections of the 1992 campaign was the Democratic Party tactic of consistently having The President referred to in this fashion, apparently playing on the idea that a 4 part name was aristocratic and out of touch with us "common folk". My impression is that some of the major media often referred to him the same way whilst using the same reference to Bill Clinton much more sparingly.

I don't have empirical data to back this up, it's just my recollection and opinion.

Awww man, how do you expect me to remember stuff that happened 14 years ago? :D

[Frozen Sooner]

I was wondering about that. How do you have a sack full of holes? You must be including the sphincter.

Well, there's a few ways you could read that.

First, of course, is the literal meaning. In which case, yes, it is impossible to have a sack full of holes, which means that it's pretty stupid. Even more stupid would be to have a sack full of *******s, which smell kind of bad.

Second, you could read it as carrying around a sack full of sphincters. Not impossible, but still stupid.

Third, it could be a sack full of people who wouldn't vote for someone based on a coincidence of names.