Perverted Ohio State Fan . . .

[OK2LA]

Just a special thank you to all of you phreaks out there that don't wear your OU gear when you decide to do stupid stuff in public.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1691888/context/tag:busted


Follow-up story:

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1701221/context/tag:busted

[hurricane'bone]

http://profile.ak.facebook.com/object/1833/21/n2204744926_27600.jpg

Deadspin had some great posts on this.

http://www.deadspin.com/sports/masturbating%20lonely%20men%20with%20mustaches/

[Scott D]

man, his dad is classic

[Widescreen]

If he'd get a job, he could do that in the privacy and comfort of his own home. But at the end of the day, raise your hand if you haven't done that.

[OK2LA]

If he'd get a job, he could do that in the privacy and comfort of his own home. But at the end of the day, raise your hand if you haven't done that.

quickly puts both hands firmly on ground

[achiro]

How in the hell does that defense attorney sleep at night?:(

[1stTimeCaller]

How in the hell does that defense attorney sleep at night?:(

are you serious?

[StoopTroup]

Listen Son...

Your Mom and I really think you should find yourself a nice girl to settle down with...

Why don't you checkout the library. You could educate yourself and find a girl whose smart like your Mother.

You know...I met your Mom at the library in college....

[achiro]

are you serious?
Sure

:pop:

[1stTimeCaller]

OK. I was just wondering if you were serious or not. No comment from me.

[fadada1]

poor dude will never be able to touch himself inappropriately again.

seriously, mainlining cialis and viagra couldn't give this guy "wood".

[sanantoniosooner]

I'm serious too.

[OU4LIFE]

But at the end of the day, raise your hand if you haven't done that.


Jerked off in a library?

I guess I should raise my hand.

[Widescreen]

Jerked off in a library?

I guess I should raise my hand.
Nice to see some of us are honest around here.

[Okla-homey]

How in the hell does that defense attorney sleep at night?:(

because the boy has rights and he is entitled to representation to help ensure those rights are not violated.

He does not, however, enjoy the right to violate himself at the public library...it tends to make the keyboard all sticky and stuff.

[Boomer.....]

I like his mustache.

[birddog]

WALK AWAY MAN, WALK AWAY.

[birddog]

also, i thought they had filters to keep that crap out of libraries.:confused:

[achiro]

because the boy has rights and he is entitled to representation to help ensure those rights are not violated.

He does not, however, enjoy the right to violate himself at the public library...it tends to make the keyboard all sticky and stuff.
This is where I think Attorneys have really screwed the pooch. I know exactly what you are saying, but defending ones rights and trying to get one off when they know the person is guilty(of any crime) are two different things and the latter is wrong in my opinion and not what was intended when the constitution was written.
There is a huge difference between, "yes your honor, my client is guilty and has admitted so. We feel like x would be a good punishment based on previous sickos similar sentences." Instead of, "Your honor, my client has realized how bad he was and is very sorry, can't we all just go home now";)

What is really bad is when an attorney know's his/her client is guilty and still fights tooth and nail to prove the client didn't do it. Again, not at all what was intended when the constitution was written(IMHO)

:pop: :D ;)

[sanantoniosooner]

There's two sides to every case.

I'd wager that one side was right at least a third of the time.

[frankensooner]

As attorneys we do not ever ever ever ask if our clients did it...geez. We could not give them effective representation then.

[Mongo]

The lawyer is gonna use the "he was scratching himself really fast for a really long time" defense. He will get off....

[crawfish]

Jerked off in a library?

I guess I should raise my hand.

Me, too.

[sanantoniosooner]

Just cuz you guys got dewey decimals doesn't make you guilty.

[achiro]

As attorneys we do not ever ever ever ask if our clients did it...geez. We could not give them effective representation then.
Why not? If they did it and should fry in hell forever then you should protect their right to do so.:D

[Scott D]

This is where I think Attorneys have really screwed the pooch. I know exactly what you are saying, but defending ones rights and trying to get one off when they know the person is guilty(of any crime) are two different things and the latter is wrong in my opinion and not what was intended when the constitution was written.
There is a huge difference between, "yes your honor, my client is guilty and has admitted so. We feel like x would be a good punishment based on previous sickos similar sentences." Instead of, "Your honor, my client has realized how bad he was and is very sorry, can't we all just go home now";)

What is really bad is when an attorney know's his/her client is guilty and still fights tooth and nail to prove the client didn't do it. Again, not at all what was intended when the constitution was written(IMHO)

:pop: :D ;)

well good thing all she was fighting for was to keep him out of prison and on probation. I actually think his lawyer did a good job considering the circumstances.

[achiro]

well good thing all she was fighting for was to keep him out of prison and on probation. I actually think his lawyer did a good job considering the circumstances.
You won't be saying that when they arrest him for exposing himself to kids in the mall.;)

[budbarrybob]

As attorneys we do not ever ever ever ask if our clients did it...geez. We could not give them effective representation then.

you are joking right... i mean, really, you are kidding? If YOU don't know the truth how are you supposed to defend it? I'm not an attorney, but this seems as a logical starting point to me. Of course they could lie to you but that wouldn't seem to be counter productive.

[Widescreen]

He will get off....
Sounds like he already did. That's why he was in court in the first place.

Ba-dump-bump.

[Mongo]

It took someone 40 minutes to knock that meatball out!!! What is this, the football forum??

[Scott D]

You won't be saying that when they arrest him for exposing himself to kids in the mall.;)

personally I'm waiting for us to create walled communities (read: camps) where we can put people like him with 0 allowance outside of the walls. :D

[achiro]

personally I'm waiting for us to create walled communities (read: camps) where we can put people like him with 0 allowance outside of the walls. :D
Maybe a big island would work. Just make sure there are lots of bugs.:D

[frankensooner]

you are joking right... i mean, really, you are kidding? If YOU don't know the truth how are you supposed to defend it? I'm not an attorney, but this seems as a logical starting point to me. Of course they could lie to you but that wouldn't seem to be counter productive.
Hey, who said anything about logic. As an officer of the court, we cannot present any evidence which is a lie. Candor to the tribuanal and all of that stuff. So, if we know for a fact that a client "did it" it sure cuts down on viable defenses. Back in the day when I did a bit of criminal defense, I would say, tell me what I need to know, and that was it. Now if a client wants to plead out, fine, spill. But if your client wants to go to trial, you don't want to know if they did it or not. They all say they didn't do it anyway.

[Scott D]

Maybe a big island would work. Just make sure there are lots of bugs.:D

I like the idea of concentra.....er gated communities more :D

[SoonerBK]

If he paid an attorney to get him off, isn't that against the law also?

[TexasSooner01]

;) Remindes me of the TTech guy ringing the bell!

[OK2LA]

Hey fella who negg spekkd me and said I was "full of chit" - sign your name so I can ask you what I'm full of chit about.

Thanks.:D

[mdklatt]

He will get off....

I thought that was the problem in the first place?

[Penguin]

I learned from Moral Orel that masturbation is worse than murder.

Instead of killing one life, you are killing millions of potential lives.

[Widescreen]

I thought that was the problem in the first place?
You're getting slow in your old age.
http://www.soonerfans.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1641502&postcount=29


Hey fella who negg spekkd me and said I was "full of chit" - sign your name so I can ask you what I'm full of chit about.

Thanks.
Why does it have to be "about" anything? ;)

[mdklatt]

I learned from Moral Orel that masturbation is worse than murder.

Instead of killing one life, you are killing millions of potential lives.

But it's okay for chicks to do it, right? :texan:

[IB4OU2]

I learned from Moral Orel that masturbation is worse than murder.

Instead of killing one life, you are killing millions of potential lives.

how about when youv'e killed trillions......:eek:

[Penguin]

how about when youv'e killed trillions......:eek:


REPENT, SINNER!

[crawfish]

Just cuz you guys got dewey decimals doesn't make you guilty.

Nice try.

[Vaevictis]

If YOU don't know the truth how are you supposed to defend it?

In our system, you don't have to know the truth to defend a charge.

All you have to know is the prosecuting attorney's theory, and be able to produce evidence that introduces reasonable doubt.

Sometimes, this comes in the form of an alternate theory. Sometimes, this comes in the form of countering the DA's evidence and/or witnesses by disproving or calling into question their validity. Sometimes it just comes in the form of suppressing evidence by rule. And I'm sure there are lots of other ways.

But knowing the truth? Totally unnecessary. And as mentioned, sometimes even counter-productive.

[OK2LA]

Hey fella who negg spekkd me and said I was "full of chit" - sign your name so I can ask you what I'm full of chit about.

Thanks.:D

Hehe - Frank gave me POSITIVE SPEKK - that cancelled out your evil red spekk! Take that you anonymous negspekker!

Thanks Frank - I almost developed a complex there.:D

[Widescreen]

Sometimes, this comes in the form of an alternate theory.
Those are usually the best.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, by now you're aware of the DNA evidence against my client that supposedly indicates odds of 8 bajillion to 1 that anyone else could've done it besides my client. However, may I direct your attention to aggy. Because realistically, no one but aggy could've done it. Come on!

[Vaevictis]

Chewbacca defense > * :)

[sanantoniosooner]

Nice try.
I don't see anyone else lining up to use library terminology in the thread.

And your dewey decimals compliment your microfiche quite well.

[WILBURJIM]

...But knowing the truth? Totally unnecessary. And as mentioned, sometimes even counter-productive.

Counter-productive because most people are decent citizens and want guilty people to be held accountable for there actions. To mislead with false or contrary information to what they know to be the truth must be trying on the ethical pysche of a person. Not really a rewarding career as far as I am concerned. I still remember O.J. Simpson's lawyer and friend Robert Kardasian's face when O.J. was found NOT GUILTY. He had a look of disgust that said, Damn, I can't believe he just got away with murder.

[sanantoniosooner]

I'll be honest.......

When I finally snap and kill somebody on the football board, I'm going to want an attorney that doesn't care if I'm guilty or not.