PDA

View Full Version : The new Ancient Wonders of the world



tbl
10/18/2006, 07:30 AM
If I could make this a poll, it would be a more suitable thread.


Stonehenge makes list in new seven wonders vote

Tue Oct 17, 8:34 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - Only one of the ancient wonders of the world still survives -- now history lovers are being invited to choose a new list of seven.
ADVERTISEMENT

Among 21 locations shortlisted for the worldwide vote is Stonehenge, the only British landmark selected.

The 5,000-year-old stones on Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, will be up against sites including the Acropolis in Athens; the Statue of Liberty in New York; and the last remaining original wonder, the Pyramids of Giza in Cairo.

An original list of nearly 200 sites nominated by the public was narrowed to 21 by the organizers and experts, including the former director general of Unesco Professor Federico Mayor.

The vote is organized by a non-profit Swiss foundation called New7Wonders which specializes in the preservation, restoration and promotion of monuments, and the results will be announced on July 7, 2007, in Lisbon.

About 20 million votes have already been lodged, including many from India, for the Taj Mahal; China, for the Great Wall and from Peru for Machu Picchu, the fortress city of the Incas.

The other original seven wonders of the ancient world were the Hanging Gardens of Babylon; the Statue of Zeus at Olympia; the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus; the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus; the Colossus of Rhodes and the Lighthouse of Alexandria.

Tia Viering, spokeswoman for New7Wonders, said: "Apart from the Pyramids, the seven ancient wonders of the world no longer exist."

The only criteria for the new list is that the landmarks were built or discovered before 2000.

"People of England, it is now your turn to be heard," added Viering. Support Stonehenge to become one of the New Seven Wonders of the World."

Votes can be made online, at www.new7wonders.com.

The 21 finalists for the New Seven Wonders of the World, alphabetically:

1 Acropolis, Athens, Greece

2 Alhambra, Granada, Spain

3 Angkor Wat temple, Cambodia

4 Chichen Itza Aztec site, Yucatan, Mexico

5 Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

6 Colosseum, Rome

7 Easter Island Statues, Chile

8 Eiffel Tower, Paris

9 Great Wall, China

10 Hagia Sophia church, Istanbul, Turkey

11 Kyomizu Temple, Kyoto, Japan

12 Kremlin/St.Basil's, Moscow

13 Machu Picchu, Peru

14 Neuschwanstein Castle, Fussen, Germany

15 Petra ancient city, Jordan

16 Pyramids of Giza, Egypt

17 Statue of Liberty, New York

18 Stonehenge, Amesbury, United Kingdom

19 Sydney Opera House, Australia

20 Taj Mahal, Agra, India

21 Timbuktu city, Mali

My 7:

Stonehenge
Pyramids
Great Wall
Colosseum
Acropolis
Chichen Itza Aztec site
Hagia Sophia

I think the first 5 are givens, the last two are a little more open for debate.

Honorable mention:

Machu Pichu
Easter Island Statues
and one not on the list, St. Peters/Vatican

Anybody care to make this interesting?

GottaHavePride
10/18/2006, 08:35 AM
I'd go with Angkor Wat over Chichen Itza...

http://www.justinelarbalestier.com/images/Angkor%20Wat.jpg

crawfish
10/18/2006, 08:44 AM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ed/OMU.jpg

dolemitesooner
10/18/2006, 08:58 AM
Mine would be
Stonehenge
Pyramids
Great Wall
Colosseum
Easter Island
Taj Mahal
Angkor Wat temple
and I have to say that this place looks pretty ****ing cool
http://www.redperuana.com/interfaz/graficos/fotos/7711741.jpg

dolemitesooner
10/18/2006, 08:59 AM
The first 5 on my list I always thougth were part of the 7 wonders anyways

GottaHavePride
10/18/2006, 09:21 AM
Is that Machu Picchu? Sweet.

dolemitesooner
10/18/2006, 09:23 AM
Is that Machu Picchu? Sweet.
yEAH IT IS BEONCYE.....man I would love to go there some day....but if I did I will tell you one person I am not going with....That one person would have a ****ing heart attck hiking up that moutain.

tbl
10/18/2006, 10:15 AM
Machu Pichu was one of my original 7, but I got to really looking at it. Obviously it's located in an awesome place, but it's just a bunch of houses. There's no really significantly sized architecture. Not that size always equates to greatness... but it sure does help. I think Machu Pichu can be more equated to the beauty that God created... and the llama just adds to it. ;)

That Angkor Wat place is pretty cool. I went with Chichen more b/c of familiarity.

Chuck Bao
10/18/2006, 10:49 AM
Definitely Angkor Wat.

I love the aesthetic sense expressed in art by the ancient Khmer culture.

And, then there is the abundant boobage expressed in art by the ancient Khmer culture.

Okay, I stole these pics off the internet, but I have my own stash, I mean pics, somewhere on my computer.

http://img5.ranchoweb.com/images/kanunu/aspara7a.jpg

http://img5.ranchoweb.com/images/kanunu/aspara8a.jpg

http://img5.ranchoweb.com/images/kanunu/aspara10a.jpg

dolemitesooner
10/18/2006, 10:51 AM
Definitely Angkor Wat.

I love the aesthetic sense expressed in art by the ancient Khmer culture.

And, then there is the abundant boobage expressed in art by the ancient Khmer culture.

Okay, I stole these pics off the internet, but I have my own stash, I mean pics, somewhere on my computer.

http://img5.ranchoweb.com/images/kanunu/aspara7a.jpg

http://img5.ranchoweb.com/images/kanunu/aspara8a.jpg

http://img5.ranchoweb.com/images/kanunu/aspara10a.jpg
All i see is little red x's in small white boxs

n8v_ndn
10/18/2006, 11:19 AM
Cahokia Mounds (http://www.cahokiamounds.com/cahokia.html) & Woodhenge (http://www.cahokiamounds.com/woodhenge.html) outside of St. Louis

tbl
10/18/2006, 11:21 AM
No offense man, but America doesn't have squat that could be considered.

tbl
10/18/2006, 11:26 AM
All i see is little red x's in small white boxs
All I see are butter faces...

Octavian
10/18/2006, 11:33 AM
yEAH IT IS BEONCYE.....man I would love to go there some day....but if I did I will tell you one person I am not going with....That one person would have a ****ing heart attck hiking up that moutain.

:D

Chuck Bao
10/18/2006, 11:33 AM
No offense man, but America doesn't have squat that could be considered.

It's not ancient yet, but archive the internet!:D

skycat
10/18/2006, 11:39 AM
Machu Pichu was one of my original 7, but I got to really looking at it. Obviously it's located in an awesome place, but it's just a bunch of houses. There's no really significantly sized architecture. Not that size always equates to greatness... but it sure does help. I think Machu Pichu can be more equated to the beauty that God created... and the llama just adds to it. ;)

That Angkor Wat place is pretty cool. I went with Chichen more b/c of familiarity.

I'd rather haul a rock to the top of the pyramids at Giza than the top of that mountain.

SicEmBaylor
10/18/2006, 02:37 PM
No offense man, but America doesn't have squat that could be considered.

Why do you hate America? Why do you love Hillary? Why are you against us and with the terrorists???

skycat
10/18/2006, 02:39 PM
No offense man, but America doesn't have squat that could be considered.

It's interesting that the Ancient North Americans don't have any architecutre that rivals the Mayans and Incas.

yermom
10/18/2006, 02:40 PM
:D

:mad:

Fugue
10/18/2006, 02:43 PM
Mine would be
Stonehenge
Pyramids
Great Wall
Colosseum
Easter Island
Taj Mahal
Angkor Wat temple
and I have to say that this place looks pretty ****ing cool
http://www.redperuana.com/interfaz/graficos/fotos/7711741.jpg

I wonder if that dude knows that the llama is ready to go all ninja on his azz

Pricetag
10/18/2006, 03:52 PM
I picked the Pyramids of Giza, The Great Wall, Stonehenge, The Acropolis, Easter Island Statues, Ankgor Wat, and the Statue of Liberty (but only because Tulsa's big Indian statue isn't built yet).

OCUDad
10/18/2006, 07:01 PM
Mount Rushmore?
Crazy Horse Memorial (some day)?

TUSooner
10/18/2006, 07:21 PM
Mount Rushmore?
WORD!
Too bad we can't mention those giant Buddhas carved in a mountainside that the ****ing dark-age bassackward barbarian Taliban blasted in Afghanistan.

TUSooner
10/18/2006, 07:30 PM
In order of preference:

And I DO think Mt Rusmore is more wonderous than a building.

Pyramids of Giza, Egypt
Great Wall, China
Stonehenge, United Kingdom
Eiffel Tower, Paris
Easter Island Statues, Chile
Taj Mahal, Agra, India

can't make up my mind about the last one

TedUjam
10/18/2006, 08:33 PM
I'd go with:

Pyramids of Giza, Egypt
Angkor Wat temple, Cambodia
Chichen Itza Aztec site, Yucatan, Mexico
Machu Picchu, Peru
Petra ancient city, Jordan
Great Wall, China
Colosseum, Rome

GottaHavePride
10/18/2006, 08:52 PM
The only thing I see is that they're not actually picking a new seven ANCIENT wonders of the world. Theyre just picking seven wonders regardless of era.

I would probably say (in no particular order)

Angkor Wat
The Colosseum
Eiffel Tower
Great Wall
Hagia Sophia
The Great Pyramids

and for number seven I'd actually prefer either Mt. Rushmore or the Empire State Building - sadly, neither are on the list.

That leaves me torn between Neuschwanstein (reportedly a major inspiration for Cinderella's Castle)
http://galeria.organic.hu/2002_08/minimundus/049%20Neuschwanstein.jpg

or the Taj Mahal, Statue of Liberty, or Kiyomizu Temple

Pricetag
10/18/2006, 10:40 PM
In order of preference:

And I DO think Mt Rusmore is more wonderous than a building.

I agree. It would have made the original list for sure. That's partly why I voted for the Statue of Liberty. They dug huge statues back then.

yermom
10/18/2006, 11:04 PM
yeah, but with modernish technology it's not really a wonder

to qualify you probably need X number of 1,000,000 slave-hours

1stTimeCaller
10/18/2006, 11:13 PM
http://www.redperuana.com/interfaz/graficos/fotos/7711741.jpg

you see all those walls? Pedro build all those walls and nobody call me 'Pedro the wall builder'.

you see all that sod? Pedro lay all that sod and nobody call me 'Pedro the sod layer'.

But you **** one llama...

Octavian
10/18/2006, 11:26 PM
:mad:

heh.

How long were and doleo on that mountain? :D

Ash
10/19/2006, 12:00 AM
It's interesting that the Ancient North Americans don't have any architecutre that rivals the Mayans and Incas.

In terms of architecture, yes. But a guy I know, who is an archeologist who works on ancient Mayan stuff, thinks Cahokia is on par with at least some of the ancient Central American sites. According to him, it's just a different way of going about building the public monuments, but if it had been found in Central America it would be touted as another accomplishment of civilization.

Pricetag
10/19/2006, 08:50 AM
yeah, but with modernish technology it's not really a wonder

to qualify you probably need X number of 1,000,000 slave-hours
1,000,000 slave hours was modernish technology four thousand years ago.

The ancient stuff definitely deserves its props, but I also think that when we're talking about something where there just isn't anything like it anywhere in the world (it has to be on a grand scale, of course), then it can be a wonder, too, no matter how it was built.