OklahomaTuba
10/16/2006, 09:19 AM
This story has been posted before, but I thought this was probably the biggest jaw dropper in the entire article...
OSU said earlier this month that the issue is irrelevant to the eminent domain case. A 1987 state attorney general's opinion says actions by an unconstitutionally composed board remain valid.
You've got to be kidding me.
http://www.tulsaworld.com/NewsStory.asp?ID=061016_Ne_A1_Membe21536
OSU said earlier this month that the issue is irrelevant to the eminent domain case. A 1987 state attorney general's opinion says actions by an unconstitutionally composed board remain valid.
You've got to be kidding me.
http://www.tulsaworld.com/NewsStory.asp?ID=061016_Ne_A1_Membe21536