PDA

View Full Version : Middle Tennessee - Louisville


Chuck Bao
10/6/2006, 07:19 PM
MT 7 - Louisville 3 10:37 1Q

Hey, how 'bout that.

Louisville marched down the field pretty easily but only got three.

MT took the kick-off back for a TD.

Go Blue Raiders!
Ash
10/6/2006, 07:23 PM
LMAO if MTSU wins.

I think there's a better chance that a pig will fly out of my *** right now, but whatever...
Flagstaffsooner
10/6/2006, 07:25 PM
Louis fumbles. MTSU recovers!!!
Chuck Bao
10/6/2006, 07:29 PM
Field Goal!

MT 10 - Louisville 3
Flagstaffsooner
10/6/2006, 07:30 PM
Sooner Magic seems to be rubbing off on some of our opponents.:eek:
sooner518
10/6/2006, 07:34 PM
Louisville QB stands in the pocket for 5 seconds, has no pressure and throws nowhere within 10 yards of a receiver. WTF Louisville punts
mrowl
10/6/2006, 07:41 PM
thanks for pointing this game out, I had no idea it was on.
BOOMERBRADLEY
10/6/2006, 07:41 PM
No way MTS wins, but I find it amusing that they have the freakin lead!
Flagstaffsooner
10/6/2006, 07:44 PM
Here's my theory. Smellslikebourbon is locked up in a drunk tank in Florida and can't give his former team mojo.
Chuck Bao
10/6/2006, 07:45 PM
MT field goal attempt failed.

Hit the left upright.

Dang!
birddog
10/6/2006, 07:45 PM
crap.
Flagstaffsooner
10/6/2006, 07:46 PM
There went the honeymoon. LV TD.
Cam
10/6/2006, 07:50 PM
They've really got to stop saying that MTSU did a good job against the run in their loss to OU. We rushed for nearly 200 yards. The score was 59-0. It was not a good defensive effort from MTSU, period.
Sooner_Bob
10/6/2006, 07:54 PM
As much as I'd love to watch this game I think I'm gonna have to switch over to watch the BSG season premiere.
mrowl
10/6/2006, 07:54 PM
dont you love it when announcers comment on a game they probably did not see? (remember it was pay per view)
birddog
10/6/2006, 08:03 PM
well, still tied 10-10. around 10 to go in half. louisville ball on their own 9.
sooneron
10/6/2006, 08:15 PM
Well, this game will surely **** up my pick'em on Yahoo!
sooneron
10/6/2006, 08:16 PM
Why did I think that Brohm was going to be back for this game?
achiro
10/6/2006, 08:20 PM
They've really got to stop saying that MTSU did a good job against the run in their loss to OU. We rushed for nearly 200 yards. The score was 59-0. It was not a good defensive effort from MTSU, period.
I've been thinking the same thing. "They did a good job holding AD in check" :confused:
sooneron
10/6/2006, 08:37 PM
I just posted 5 times in the wrong fugging game thread.
Hornsarelosers
10/6/2006, 08:51 PM
Louisville is a much different team without Broehm.
birddog
10/6/2006, 09:00 PM
23-10. half.
oumartin
10/6/2006, 09:51 PM
I haven't got to watch this game until now but i have to say the score of this game says alot.. Maybe our Sooners are a little under rated and Oregon is better than I thought and so is MTSU.
sooneron
10/6/2006, 09:55 PM
I haven't got to watch this game until now but i have to say the score of this game says alot.. Maybe our Sooners are a little under rated and Oregon is better than I thought and so is MTSU.
meh, mtsu did not show up for our game. At all.

C'mon Louisville, time to cover baby!!!
sooneron
10/6/2006, 09:56 PM
Louisville is a much different team without Broehm.
scUM may beg to differ. Louisville is sloppy tonight and mtsu came to play.
sooneron
10/6/2006, 09:57 PM
Where was this kick returner of mtsu's when we kicked to him 10 times? Or does Louisville's kick coverage suck that much?
King Crimson
10/6/2006, 10:02 PM
as much as i dislike college teams that copy NFL teams for their "look" (Iowa, KU, etc.).....you have to question the wisdom of trying to look like the Detroit Lions.
sooneron
10/6/2006, 10:05 PM
At least it's not the old school Detroit Lions. Those throwbacks were horrible.
sooneron
10/6/2006, 10:05 PM
C'mon Louisville!!!! Get the ball and score!
momark
10/6/2006, 10:07 PM
whats the score now
sooneron
10/6/2006, 10:08 PM
37-10
momark
10/6/2006, 10:09 PM
ty
sooneron
10/6/2006, 10:13 PM
Crap!! they convert on fourth down. No way Louisville scores again. That may be the one thing that causes Louisville to score, btw..
sooneron
10/6/2006, 10:14 PM
Steve Slaton is going to kill Louisville on the corner. C I L the redbirds!
sooneron
10/6/2006, 10:15 PM
#&@^@%##%$@$@!!!!!!

mtsu scores

@&#%#%@*@*#*#&^#&*@&@^@^@****!!!!

37-17 friggin papa john's humpers!
sooneron
10/6/2006, 10:18 PM
OMG, now they are crowing about mtsu's D holding AD to less than 5 ypc for 2.1 quarters!
olevetonahill
10/6/2006, 11:10 PM
score ? game still on ? where ?
King Crimson
10/6/2006, 11:14 PM
44-17, Lousiville.
sooneron
10/6/2006, 11:19 PM
Bastards didn't cover. This wknd is starting off like last wknd. :(
olevetonahill
10/6/2006, 11:20 PM
dayum i gotta quit betting the spread :O
King Crimson
10/6/2006, 11:22 PM
Bastards didn't cover. This wknd is starting off like last wknd. :(

don't sweat it, it was still the right play. sometimes you lose.
olevetonahill
10/6/2006, 11:23 PM
Bastards didn't cover. This wknd is starting off like last wknd. :(
f..k the spread , i bet 100 OU wins str8 up
i didnt even have to give any points ;)
stoopified
10/7/2006, 08:17 AM
Where was this kick returner of mtsu's when we kicked to him 10 times? Or does Louisville's kick coverage suck that much?
You are lokking at it all wrong.Louisville has great coverage,but ours is better.MTSU ain't as bad as we made them lokk.The same thing can be said about UW in our 37-20 win and UO in our 33-27 win.That is one reason I like our chances today.We have played two good teams and won,UT has played one and got b!tch-slapped.
Cam
10/7/2006, 09:24 AM
OMG, now they are crowing about mtsu's D holding AD to less than 5 ypc for 2.1 quarters!
The announcers did that all game long.
mustangsooner
10/7/2006, 09:39 AM
What I want to know is why they are saying that Louisville has such a great Defense. MTSU scored 17 on them and none on us and they say our D sucks. What is the dillio:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: