PDA

View Full Version : Prof. Jones' WTC presentation



n8v_ndn
6/27/2006, 01:23 PM
Saw it this weekend...must say, he raised some very interesting points related to what's seen in footage, what was noted during the cleanup, and activities behind the scenes.

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? (http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html)

GDC
6/27/2006, 02:22 PM
So Bush blew up the buildings?

picasso
6/27/2006, 02:39 PM
Bush was too busy planting those charges in New Orleans.

Stoop Dawg
6/27/2006, 02:44 PM
Been there, discussed that (http://www.soonerfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63179&highlight=wtc+collapse)

Hatfield
6/27/2006, 02:48 PM
it does raise some questions that will never be answered.

some questions legit others not so much

slickdawg
6/27/2006, 03:02 PM
I'm dissapointed. I expected Colnel Sanders recipe to be solved in all of that.

picasso
6/27/2006, 03:08 PM
it does raise some questions that will never be answered.

some questions legit others not so much
you could say that about anything. one could imagine we let Japan bomb Pearl Harbor just so's we could go to war! yeah.

OklahomaTuba
6/27/2006, 03:13 PM
http://ochremedia.com/blog/media/mindHat.gif

Wacademics at their best.

From this ****** bags primary source:


They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.

These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."

These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease30Jan2006.html

Karl Rove WAS RESPONSIBLE 9-11!!!!!!! HOLY SHIAT!!!!!

GDC
6/27/2006, 03:14 PM
you could say that about anything. one could imagine we let Japan bomb Pearl Harbor just so's we could go to war! yeah.

That's actually what my grandmother believed, that FDR was behind it.

n8v_ndn
6/27/2006, 03:16 PM
http://ochremedia.com/blog/media/mindHat.gif

http://home.no.net/holodoc/ordinary1.jpg

Hoosier Dynasty
6/27/2006, 03:20 PM
I'm dissapointed. I expected Colnel Sanders recipe to be solved in all of that.

It's all a big conspiracy and it all goes back to Enron or Exxon Mobile.

What a hack of a "scientist" to be coming up with bogus #@ like that and publishing an afterword of the two people that gave him props. :texan:

Hoosier Dynasty
6/27/2006, 03:21 PM
you could say that about anything. one could imagine we let Japan bomb Pearl Harbor just so's we could go to war! yeah.

I think letting four planes get hijacked and crashed into buildings would be excuse enough. Your WWII reference is in fact, fact.

Stoop Dawg
6/27/2006, 03:25 PM
Your WWII reference is in fact, fact.

This from a guy who thinks the Hoosiers have/had a "dynasty". ;)

Hoosier Dynasty
6/27/2006, 03:35 PM
This from a guy who thinks the Hoosiers have/had a "dynasty". ;)

And you would call it what?

What would you call Oklahoma?

Stoop Dawg
6/27/2006, 03:44 PM
Do people in Chicago not understand ;)?

Hoosier Dynasty
6/27/2006, 03:52 PM
Do people in Chicago not understand ;)?

As opposed to those in the breadbasket? Understand what?

jeremy885
6/27/2006, 04:49 PM
http://ochremedia.com/blog/media/mindHat.gif

Wacademics at their best.

From this ****** bags primary source:

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease30Jan2006.html

Karl Rove WAS RESPONSIBLE 9-11!!!!!!! HOLY SHIAT!!!!!


I thought the Israelis were responsible for 9/11?

Stoop Dawg
6/27/2006, 05:23 PM
Understand what?

I was afraid of that.

n8v_ndn
6/27/2006, 05:31 PM
http://ochremedia.com/blog/media/mindHat.gif

Wacademics at their best.

From this ****** bags primary source:

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease30Jan2006.html

Karl Rove WAS RESPONSIBLE 9-11!!!!!!! HOLY SHIAT!!!!!

I know the mention of 'Rove' might send you into a Republican Elephant stampede, but--if you took the time to *read*--his name is mentioned in terms of a trend where one (person or administration) manipulates and eventually creates its own reality to fit what they want to (or you) believe (like the pre-war 'evidence').

The interesting aspects I referred to were:

- footage of squibs (?), indicating possible (?) charges going off

- pics of beams that were apparently 'vaporized', when the fires were not ever hot enough to cause that

- molten metal in the rubble days afterward--which has never been seen in 'moden' skyscapers that have suffered longer fires.

- the speed of bldg 7's collapse, even w/ the relatively minor damage it had

I don't wholesale buy into this, I'm just wondering

C&CDean
6/27/2006, 05:36 PM
This POS has made it to 18 posts? Amazing.

Hoosier Dynasty
6/27/2006, 05:42 PM
I was afraid of that.

That's what I thought.

leavingthezoo
6/27/2006, 05:44 PM
considering the distance from where the planes hit, and the ground level... and the number of people who DID make it out, wouldn't someone have noticed explosions nowhere near the planes if this was plausible?

the best things about theories are, you can pretty much slant them anyway you want with absolutely no way to totally prove them. that's why both the defense and prosecutors both have "expert" witnesses who always seem to "believe" which ever side they are witnessing for.

(this administration has done numerous things that we can pick a part. this one ain't one of 'em, IMO.)

Hoosier Dynasty
6/27/2006, 05:58 PM
considering the distance from where the planes hit, and the ground level... and the number of people who DID make it out, wouldn't someone have noticed explosions nowhere near the planes if this was plausible?

the best things about theories are, you can pretty much slant them anyway you want with absolutely no way to totally prove them. that's why both the defense and prosecutors both have "expert" witnesses who always seem to "believe" which ever side they are witnessing for.

(this administration has done numerous things that we can pick a part. this one ain't one of 'em, IMO.)

Just a hack professor trying to make a name for himself and hopefully sell a ton of books to some gullible people before he fades back into obscurity - sometime shortly after he is clobbered by the scientific community for his wild accusations.

StoopTroup
6/27/2006, 06:25 PM
Tyler Durden?

Oh and btw...

Magnesium burns very hot.