which came first?

[Ike]

The egg apparently.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/

now we can move on to the more pressing issues of the day, like the sounds made by trees falling in a forest with nobody around.

[BlondeSoonerGirl]

I wonder if it came before bacon.

''...Bacon sounds cool. I wanna hang with bacon...'

[colleyvillesooner]

Misleading thread title.

[colleyvillesooner]

Oh, and the reporter should be fired for using the term "eggsperts" in the article.

[ChickSoonerFan]

That makes perfect sense if you believe in the evolution theory.

If you believe in creation, the chicken makes more sense.

Just my opnion of course.

[yermom]

I wonder if it came before bacon.

''...Bacon sounds cool. I wanna hang with bacon...'

:D

[yermom]

man, i think i was like 13 when i came up with the same answer to this question, btw

[SCOUT]

So a chicken embryo is a chicken. Does that make a fetus a person? ;)

runs for cover...

[TopDawg]

That makes perfect sense if you believe in the evolution theory.

If you believe in creation, the chicken makes more sense.



I'd say that if you believe in creation, they both make equal sense. I don't see how one is more probable than the other.

Heck, if you believe in creation, it's possible that they were created at the same time. God could have simultaneously created an egg with a chick in it and a chicken to incubate and help raise the chick.

[Tiptonsooner]

We do know that there where no Hillbillies present at that time. The chicken woulda been on the grill and the egg in a skillet.

[Flagstaffsooner]

My HS biology teacher told me the same thing over 30 years ago as we were cutting up worms.

[BeetDigger]

That makes perfect sense if you believe in the evolution theory.

If you believe in creation, the chicken makes more sense.

Just my opnion of course.



I figured your answer would be Stanley. :texan: