PDA

View Full Version : *OFFICIAL* CFN PREVIEW - SOONERS


BOOMERBRADLEY
4/20/2006, 11:30 PM
:EDIT:

This is the OFFICIAL CFN PREVIEW THREAD (thanks Octavian)



http://www.collegefootballnews.com/Big_12/2006_Previews/Oklahoma_preview.htm

Offense - http://www.collegefootballnews.com/Big_12/2006_Previews/Oklahoma_offense.htm

Defense - http://www.collegefootballnews.com/Big_12/2006_Previews/Oklahoma_defense.htm

Depth Chart - http://www.collegefootballnews.com/Big_12/2006_Previews/Oklahoma_depthchart.htm

Further Analysis - http://www.collegefootballnews.com/Big_12/2006_Previews/Oklahoma_FA.htm
Octavian
4/20/2006, 11:35 PM
thanks but you forgot the ***OFFICIAL*** ;)
OUGreg723
4/20/2006, 11:51 PM
Sweet. Looks pretty accurate actually.
Collier11
4/21/2006, 12:20 AM
they are off a little on the analysis on some players ex: patrick being pushed aside by murray which may happen but I dont see it right away) But overall pretty good
BOOMERBRADLEY
4/21/2006, 12:25 AM
Speaking of which...

Does anyone think Murray will impress enough to be a punt/kick returner this season ?
Collier11
4/21/2006, 12:32 AM
Ive heard that is his best chance of making an immediate impact, IF he can prove that he doesnt fumble
TripleOption14
4/21/2006, 08:37 AM
Hmm.... its kinda hard to take this guy serious w/ so many spelling and grammer errors. And this piece of writing was not sent to an editor??? If you want to be taken as a good source of college football info. at least spell words right in your article. Good lord.
LSUdeek
4/21/2006, 08:42 AM
[QUOTE=TripleOption14]Hmm.... its kinda hard to take this guy serious w/ so many spelling and grammer errors./QUOTE]

:(
BOOMERBRADLEY
4/21/2006, 08:44 AM
Honestly, I read it just fine even though it was messed up.
TripleOption14
4/21/2006, 08:58 AM
Honestly, I read it just fine even though it was messed up.

Oh, i read it just fine as well but isn't it basic journalism 101 to have someone proof read your writing?
BOOMERBRADLEY
4/21/2006, 09:01 AM
I'm not saying you're wrong

I just thought you meant you had no desire to read it
melbitoast
4/22/2006, 11:44 AM
Overall, I thought the analysis was great, and has me pumped '06. The only thing I disagree with slightly are the analysis on Patrick. I don't think the pushing aside will occur as soon as predicted, but then again, Stoops isn't shy about putting in true freshman. And, I think Birdine will be a much bigger presence. Ah You and Thibodeaux are fantastic, but Birdine is just as good. It will be tough to keep him off the field. Finally, I think we're better at DT then he's saying, "lack of huge tackle". If I recall, aren't Granger and McCoy both ~300lbs?
Either way, if our O-line can be just a little better than last year, we're going to be dominant.
chriscappel
4/22/2006, 11:51 AM
It just gets me even more excited for the year to start!