47straight
2/27/2006, 03:18 PM
To members of the legal community, particularly in Oklahoma, but for anyone who is familiar with the murder case of Robert Andrew.
It seems to me that Brenda Andrew's sister, Kim Bowlin, was complicit in helping her get away after the fact. Her husband was caught with the kids coming through the border back in the US, and Bonnie and Clyde were a few cars back. Kim Bowlin was waiting at a hotel for the kids.
Now, it wouldn't matter to me except her shameless displays to the press, such as "Don't be so quick to judge my sister," and "She would never do anything to endanger her children" (except kill their dad in the next room, I presume), and suing for custody of them over Robert's parents.
My question - why wasn't she nailed to the wall for obstruction of justice, accomplice after the fact (or whatever it is called in the Oklahoma statutes)?
It seems to me that Brenda Andrew's sister, Kim Bowlin, was complicit in helping her get away after the fact. Her husband was caught with the kids coming through the border back in the US, and Bonnie and Clyde were a few cars back. Kim Bowlin was waiting at a hotel for the kids.
Now, it wouldn't matter to me except her shameless displays to the press, such as "Don't be so quick to judge my sister," and "She would never do anything to endanger her children" (except kill their dad in the next room, I presume), and suing for custody of them over Robert's parents.
My question - why wasn't she nailed to the wall for obstruction of justice, accomplice after the fact (or whatever it is called in the Oklahoma statutes)?