PDA

View Full Version : New Mexico Begins Legislative Process To Ban Aspartame



Hatfield
1/20/2006, 02:13 PM
New Mexico Begins Legislative Process To Ban Aspartame
Fifteen state senators sponsored a bill to rid New Mexico of what some have called "Rumsfeld's Disease."
20 Jan 2006

By Greg Szymanski



A senate bill to rid New Mexico of what has been called "Rumsfeld's Disease" was introduced Thursday by Sen. Gerald Ortiz y Pino, D-Albuquerque, as 15 other senators from both sides of isle also signed on, supporting legislation to ban the deadly artificial sweetener, aspartame.



Linked to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for his efforts in the 1970s for putting the sweetener on the market, New Mexico is the first state to consider banning the artificial additive linked to numerous ill-health affects, including cancer.



If passed, no food containing any amount of the sweetener could be manufactured, sold or delivered in Mew Mexico, beginning July 1.



After the bill was introduced Thursday morning, Sen. Ortiz y Pino, appearing on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal, said he needs support from six more senators for passage if the anti-aspartame legislation makes its way for a vote during the short 30-day legislative session.



The Albuquerque democrat also said the bill needs to be put on the "governor's call list" in order for it to be heard, remaining optimistic since Gov. Bill Richardson has expressed strong concern about the health hazards of aspartame in the past.



"I decided to introduce this bill, despite strong opposition by lobbyists because it is the right thing to do and many of my constituents feel the artificial sweetener is dangerous," said Sen. Ortiz y Pino while appearing on The Investigative Journal.



"I am very optimistic that the banning of aspartame will be passed into law since 15 senators signed on with me to support the bill. I know of one other who has said he join us, leaving only six more votes to get it passed in the senate if it comes to a vote this session."



Besides the senate bill, New Mexico's House of Representatives has also introduced a similar bill, House Bill 202, calling for the same ban on aspartame.



The House version of the bill was introduced by Gallup democrat, Irvin Harrison, who claims the measure, if passed, "means a vital national and international precedent would be set, one which could precipitate a new era of consumer protection in the United States and other nations."



New Mexico resident and Santa Fe art gallery owner Stephen Fox has been one of the main activists pushing to raise public awareness and outlaw the use of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved additive.



Fox and many others trying to ban aspartame have for years been trying to warn unsuspecting users of the dangers, saying aspartame contains "poisonous and deadly toxins."



Before legislation was introduced, Fox tried to get aspartame banned through the state's Environmental Improvement Board (EIB), but after pressure from aspartame lobbyists, postponed any action on Fox's request until July.



The New Mexico Legislature established the EIB in 1978 to handle rules on the state's food and water supply, liquid waste, air quality and radiation control. However, any action by the legislature to ban aspartame would supersede an EIB ruling.



Although the EIB said in October that it had the necessary power to handle Fox's petition, on Nov. 9, the board backtracked, asking in writing for Attorney General Patricia Madrid's opinion on whether state law gives it the authority to regulate aspartame and whether the board could carry out Fox's request to outlaw or put warning labels on products that contain the sweetener. The board has not received an answer from Madrid.



Regarding the adverse health affects from aspartame, a recent report from a highly respected international medical team has now linked the toxins in aspartame to lymphomas and leukemias.



The report by Morando Soffritti "Aspartame induces lymphomas and leukemias in rats" is in the European Journal of Oncology for July, 2005. Dr. Sofritti is a member of the European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences Cancer Research Centre in Bologna, Italy.



As reported, Dr. Soffritti and his team carefully set the conditions whereby genetically-uniform test rats were treated equally with the exception of being divided into groups given varying levels of the toxic chemical sweetener.



According to health experts, rats are deemed appropriate subjects for testing aspartame on humans because both humans and rats metabolize the methyl ester in aspartame into methyl alcohol, then formaldehyde then formic acid - all deadly poisons.



Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD, one of the world's leading authorities on aspartame neuro toxicity, extensively reviewed the Soffritti report.



"This study confirmed the previous study by Dr. Trocho and co-workers (1998), which also found the formaldehyde breakdown product of aspartame to be damaging to cellular DNA and that this damage was cumulative," said Dr. Blaylock. "The type of damage was a duplicate of that associated with cancers. These two studies strongly indicate that drinking a single diet cola sweetened with aspartame every day could significantly increase one's risk of developing a lymphoma or leukemia.



"This study should terrify mothers and all those consuming aspartame sweetened products. This was a carefully done study which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in several types of lymphomas and leukemias in rats. Both of these malignancies have increased significantly in this country since the widespread use of aspartame.



"They also found an increased incidence of malignant brain tumors, even though it was not statistically significant. This does not mean there is no association to brain tumors, since ONLY the animals exposed to aspartame developed the tumors. With children and pregnant women drinking the largest amount of diet colas, this puts their children at the greatest risk of developing one of these horrible diseases. Their found that even lower doses of aspartame could cause these malignancies, yet, the higher the dose, the more cancers that were seen.



"Since aspartame can increase obesity and may even cause the metabolic syndrome that affects 48 million Americans, there is no reason to ever consume this product. At the least, it should be immediately banned from all schools."



For more informative articles, go to www.arcticbeacon.com

Greg Szymanski

mdklatt
1/20/2006, 02:17 PM
I like how they refer to it as "Rumsfeld's Disease" so you know there's no partisan motivation behind it. :rolleyes:

mrowl
1/20/2006, 02:33 PM
wow... this should be done by the FDA, but they get payed way too much money by lobbyist to do that.

yermom
1/20/2006, 02:37 PM
Aspartame is the devil

i've said this for years

OUstudent4life
1/20/2006, 02:38 PM
Aspartame causes cancer. That's been proven.

Of course, it was cancer in rats, and if you gave a rat ANYTHING in the amounts they forced them to eat, there's a decent chance they might get cancer.

And oooh, big surprise, a chemical that our bodies can't break down for energy but looks enough on the molecular level like sugar that it A) tastes like sugar, and B) is probably absorbed by cells like sugar, shows up in cancer cells that are growing REALLY FAST AND ABSORB A TON OF NUTRIENTS.

That being said, everyone should switch to splenda anyway.

Just don't eat those chips with Olestra. Two words: anal leakage.

Pieces Hit
1/20/2006, 02:39 PM
I liked it better when it was Asparwild.

Much sweeter.

GDC
1/20/2006, 02:39 PM
Aspartame doesn't contain toxins, in the body it breaks down into things like methanol and formaldehyde.

Viking Kitten
1/20/2006, 02:39 PM
I've been drinking about 96 ounces of Diet Coke a day for the last 18 years.

I feel fine.

mdklatt
1/20/2006, 02:41 PM
Aspartame doesn't contain toxins, in the body it breaks down into things like methanol and formaldehyde.

It may kill you, but at least your relatives will save cash on the embalming. :eek:

Okla-homey
1/20/2006, 02:41 PM
Methinks NM hath no power to take on Pepsico and Coca-Cola. "Big Soda" will kick their booty in court.

In the meantime, Nutra-sweet smuggling and illegal trafficking will cost thousand of ruined lives and will fill their prisons to overflowing. Overflowing I tell ya!

Okla-homey
1/20/2006, 02:43 PM
I've been drinking about 96 ounces of Diet Coke a day for the last 18 years.

I feel fine.

Me too sister (Diet Pepsi) but its the same sweet chit. I feel fine too and I'm still sharp as a tack at the advanced age of 46.

Viking Kitten
1/20/2006, 02:46 PM
Me too sister (Diet Pepsi) but its the same sweet chit. I feel fine too and I'm still sharp as a tack at the advanced age of 46.

Also, I have noticed that I still get ID'd a lot at the age of 34. I think I am being preserved. :)

Okla-homey
1/20/2006, 02:49 PM
Also, I have noticed that I still get ID'd a lot at the age of 34. I think I am being preserved. :)

I think if I sold alcohol, I'd ID ALL the good looking broads because it always puts you guys in a good mood.

just saying.

critical_phil
1/20/2006, 03:27 PM
That being said, everyone should switch to splenda anyway.



Scott D-nip

Nab'R
1/20/2006, 03:30 PM
I've been drinking about 96 ounces of Diet Coke a day for the last 18 years.

I feel fine.
Me Three

yermom
1/20/2006, 03:33 PM
Aspartame causes cancer. That's been proven.

Of course, it was cancer in rats, and if you gave a rat ANYTHING in the amounts they forced them to eat, there's a decent chance they might get cancer.

And oooh, big surprise, a chemical that our bodies can't break down for energy but looks enough on the molecular level like sugar that it A) tastes like sugar, and B) is probably absorbed by cells like sugar, shows up in cancer cells that are growing REALLY FAST AND ABSORB A TON OF NUTRIENTS.

That being said, everyone should switch to splenda anyway.

Just don't eat those chips with Olestra. Two words: anal leakage.

but it has Chlorine in it CHLORINE

Nab'R
1/20/2006, 03:34 PM
but it has Chlorine in it CHLORINE
So does swimming pool water. What are you saying?

yermom
1/20/2006, 03:39 PM
yeah, and salt

i just remember some sensationalistic email forward that was making a big deal about Chlorine being in Splenda

i guess i left off the ;)

GDC
1/20/2006, 03:43 PM
Saccharine is probably the least harmful of the artificial sweeteners.

skycat
1/20/2006, 03:47 PM
Mercury is the sweetest of the transition metals.

OUstudent4life
1/20/2006, 04:03 PM
yeah, and salt

i just remember some sensationalistic email forward that was making a big deal about Chlorine being in Splenda

i guess i left off the ;)


Yeah, that's pretty messed up.

Splenda is just the sugar molecule, but at one point, instead of having an oxygen and a hydrogen, there's a chlorine atom.

That email forgets to point out that sugar has HYDROGEN IN IT!!! CRAP, WE'RE ALL GOING TO EXPLODE!!!!!!!!!1111!!oneone SO DOES WATER, WE'RE DOOOOOMMMEEEDDDD!!! NOT EVEN VIN DIESEL CAN SAVE US, EVEN THOUGH HE HAS "DIESEL" IN HIS NAME AND THAT'S ALSO INFLAMMABLE...OR IS IT FLAMMABLE I CAN'T REMEMBER WHICH!!!!!!!!!!!

ok i'm better now. oh, and totpayshp

OklahomaTuba
1/20/2006, 04:21 PM
Well, Bush and Halliburton did create the hurricanes to kill black people, so good ole Rummy creating cancer causing sweetner, in an effort to kill more blacks and democrats no doubt, makes sense i guess.

proud gonzo
1/20/2006, 04:22 PM
artificial sweeteners are the devil.

GDC
1/20/2006, 04:36 PM
Well, Bush and Halliburton did create the hurricanes to kill black people, so good ole Rummy creating cancer causing sweetner, in an effort to kill more blacks and democrats no doubt, makes sense i guess.

Well, crack didn't do the job either.

GottaHavePride
1/20/2006, 06:37 PM
Aspartame is ALMOST as bad as high-fructose corn syrup. Can we get that **** banned, too?