PDA

View Full Version : Remember that thread about the best B12 team?



BOOMERBRADLEY
1/10/2006, 10:29 AM
http://www.collegefootballnews.com/Almanac/CFN_Formula/CFN_FormulaAllTime.htm

Well, it looks like we have a new leader :confused:

NickZeppelin
1/10/2006, 10:34 AM
Quality Wins: 9. UL Lafayette, at Ohio State, at Missouri, Oklahoma, Colorado, Texas Tech, Kansas, Colorado, USC

Now that's funny

C&CDean
1/10/2006, 10:36 AM
http://www.collegefootballnews.com/Almanac/CFN_Formula/CFN_FormulaAllTime.htm

Well, it looks like I might wanna get baned for a day or two for ignorant acts unbecoming a Sooner.:confused:

Don't push your luck.

John Kochtoston
1/10/2006, 10:36 AM
I say this with nothing but the upmost respect for Bob Stoops, Josh Heupel, et al...

BUT...

If the 2000 OU team is the third best college football team since 1970, I'll wash Pete Fiutak's a** and drink the water. The argument could be made that the 2000 team is not the third-best Oklahoma team since 1970.

BoomerJack
1/10/2006, 10:36 AM
Sombody at CFN has way too much time on their hands.

OklahomaTuba
1/10/2006, 10:37 AM
La Laugh is a quality win??

WTF is this guy smoking?

RooseveltRoughRider
1/10/2006, 10:40 AM
Well, the site says that it is NOT a Who is the Best Team list, but who had the best season.

I like the fact that the top 4 are Big 12 Schools..

I am saying WTF to the fact that I do not see OU 2004 on that list....anywhere unless I am blind.:confused:

RooseveltRoughRider
1/10/2006, 10:41 AM
La Laugh is a quality win??

WTF is this guy smoking?

I think I probably shouldn't even mention this.

NickZeppelin
1/10/2006, 10:54 AM
Is this thread breaking the NHT rule?

FaninAma
1/10/2006, 10:57 AM
So a win over a 6-5 Kansas team is given the same weight as a win over a 12-2 nebraska team and less than OU's win over KS in the 2000 conference title game.

I could set up a system and assign the points in a way that would support Okie State being the best team in the conference this year.

What a piece of garbage article and it just serves as further proof that most sports reporters are retarded and totally useless for any meaningful purpose.

BOOMERBRADLEY
1/10/2006, 11:49 AM
O crap!

Forgive me please. I totally forgot.

Please accept my most sincere apology Dean

yermom
1/10/2006, 12:11 PM
Well, the site says that it is NOT a Who is the Best Team list, but who had the best season.

I like the fact that the top 4 are Big 12 Schools..

I am saying WTF to the fact that I do not see OU 2004 on that list....anywhere unless I am blind.:confused:

i'm thinking that these are teams that won the MNC

starclassic tama
1/10/2006, 01:35 PM
i thought the same thing, but i see 2005 usc on there...

BermudaSooner
1/10/2006, 01:39 PM
Looks like they re-evaulated their formula from before the RB. They had OU 2000 behind FSU 1993 and NU 1971. They gave OU an extra 0.5 for beating KSU at 11-3 twice.

Anyway, I seriously doubt this will change the price of beer.

CatfishSooner
1/10/2006, 01:50 PM
How much is the beer....

crawfish
1/10/2006, 01:57 PM
There are quite a few factors they're not considering. For instance, a win over A&M in 2005 and 2000 are given the same weight...

They also don't seem to give much weight to "elite" wins...our score in 2000 was only 1 more point than this year, DESPITE the fact we played 4 games vs. their two? So, adding a win vs. ULaLa gives you a point but playing a top 5 team instead only gives you .5? A little ridiculous if you ask me.