PDA

View Full Version : milestone threads are ghey



yermom
8/11/2005, 06:16 PM
yeah, i couldn't find the other one for 11K :D

Sooner_Bob
8/11/2005, 06:20 PM
Heh . . .

OUthunder
8/11/2005, 06:22 PM
Haven't you hit that number twice now?

yermom
8/11/2005, 06:25 PM
don't start with me, sucka :D

silverwheels
8/11/2005, 06:29 PM
Testing Area?

BlondeSoonerGirl
8/11/2005, 06:35 PM
Yay, you!



Good Times - Tommy Lee

OUinFLA
8/11/2005, 07:07 PM
the first 3 posters in this thread combine for about 35,000 posts..........
miltiply that number by...say....oh, at least 3 minutes would equal..........
105,000 minutes..........
divide that by 60 would be approx..............1750 hours..........
divided by.........lets say 8 working hours in a work day....
giving you...roughly 218 full work days........divided by 5 work days in a week....
would result in...a little over 43 weeks of workdays............

Y'all want me to go on?

OklahomaTrombone
8/11/2005, 07:09 PM
no.

critical_phil
8/11/2005, 07:17 PM
yeah, i couldn't find the other one for 11K :D





i would have gone with:





11K bitches. hey dolemite, wanna come over and hump?




you know, if i were you................

BeetDigger
8/11/2005, 07:27 PM
Actually Phil, I don't think he has to ask. I think that there is a standing invitation. :D

OklahomaTrombone
8/11/2005, 08:00 PM
I thought they were already humping?

yermom
8/11/2005, 09:38 PM
i would have gone with:








you know, if i were you................








this is why i'm glad you are not me :D

OUthunder
8/12/2005, 09:00 AM
the first 3 posters in this thread combine for about 35,000 posts..........
miltiply that number by...say....oh, at least 3 minutes would equal..........
105,000 minutes..........
divide that by 60 would be approx..............1750 hours..........
divided by.........lets say 8 working hours in a work day....
giving you...roughly 218 full work days........divided by 5 work days in a week....
would result in...a little over 43 weeks of workdays............

Y'all want me to go on?



It's good to be the boss isn't it Bill? That had to take you at least 2-3 hours to figure out. Maybe you had your accountant do it? ;)

yermom
10/3/2005, 02:54 PM
bump

Scott D
10/3/2005, 03:07 PM
yermom is a posting whore

yermom
10/3/2005, 03:08 PM
don't be hatin'

yermom
10/31/2005, 03:13 PM
heh

Sooner_Bob
10/31/2005, 03:15 PM
numba14K.1

OUinFLA
10/31/2005, 03:18 PM
yermom's posting graph:

http://home.blarg.net/~glinden/Findory-2005-traffic-chart-small.jpg

IronSooner
10/31/2005, 05:02 PM
Step 1: Posting
Step 2:
Step 3: Profit!

yermom
10/31/2005, 05:22 PM
yeah when i became a post whore, i thought there was money involved :mad:

OUthunder
10/31/2005, 05:26 PM
Step 2: Padding

Widescreen
10/31/2005, 05:55 PM
As you can see from the following chart, your number of posts is inversely proportional to having a life.

http://www.tape2disc.net/postsvslife.JPG

Sooner_Bob
10/31/2005, 05:56 PM
Some how this thread turned out better than it did the first time.

yermom
3/10/2006, 01:01 PM
Some how this thread turned out better than it did the first time.

how about this time?

colleyvillesooner
3/10/2006, 01:02 PM
Nope, still sucks

yermom
3/10/2006, 01:55 PM
As you can see from the following chart, your number of posts is inversely proportional to having a life.

http://www.tape2disc.net/postsvslife.JPG

i just realized why this never sat well with me

shouldn't the axeses be switched?

mdklatt
3/10/2006, 01:59 PM
shouldn't the axises be switched?

Not necessarily. The independent variable customarily goes on the x-axis, but which is the independent variable? Do you have almost 20,000 posts because you have no life, or do you have no life because you have almost 20,000 posts?

yermom
3/10/2006, 02:03 PM
i think the implication is that "Life Rating" can be predicted by "Posts"

i can see it the other way, but having no life isn't causal for posts, you could just read a lot of comics or something else instead

Hamhock
3/10/2006, 02:03 PM
I think the fact that you know "the independent variable customarily goes on the x-axis" proves you have no life. ;)

yermom
3/10/2006, 02:05 PM
hey i musta learned something in all those technical classes i never use for anything else ;)

mdklatt
3/10/2006, 02:15 PM
i think the impication is that "Life Rating" can be predicted by "Posts"

Then the axes should be switched




i can see it the other way, but having no life isn't causal for posts, you could just read a lot of comics or something else instead

Sure it is, because if you had a life you wouldn't be posting or reading comic books. If you start considering other factors you really need a multivariate technique.

OUDoc
3/10/2006, 02:20 PM
I'm thinking the above discussion can be substituted for "# of posts" in the graph. :D

silverwheels
3/10/2006, 02:50 PM
The plural of "axis" is "axes."


EDIT: and mdklatt already corrected that...

yermom
3/10/2006, 03:41 PM
and you guys say i have no life ;)

silverwheels
3/10/2006, 03:50 PM
and you guys say i have no life ;)

Well, I don't know, Mr. 18K posts... :D

critical_phil
8/21/2006, 10:31 PM
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/2926/6500si6.jpg

proud gonzo
8/21/2006, 10:32 PM
heh

yermom
8/22/2006, 01:02 AM
heh, axeses

StoopTroup
8/22/2006, 01:09 AM
Wow...

This thread is like a cat.

yermom
10/3/2006, 09:36 AM
nine lives ;)

i think i have probably hit 22k that many times now :eek:

BoogercountySooner
10/3/2006, 10:17 AM
Not everyone can say Yermom has hit it 22,000 times.:D

colleyvillesooner
11/12/2006, 07:19 PM
http://www.fredart.com/fredart/ga_graphics/15000.jpg

Widescreen
11/12/2006, 09:33 PM
Congrats, ho.

StoopTroup
11/12/2006, 09:36 PM
That's alot of trojans....