PDA

View Full Version : I'm a pretty good President, If I ran, I would win a third term



Sooner in Tampa
7/28/2015, 11:11 AM
This f&*cking guy....


“I actually think I’m a pretty good president,” he said. “I think if I ran, I could win. But I can’t. So there’s a lot that I’d like to do to keep America moving, but the law is the law.”

http://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-im-a-pretty-good-president-and-if-i-ran-for-a-third-term-i-could-win/

TheHumanAlphabet
7/28/2015, 11:28 AM
What a focktard... Has no clue of his standing in this country...

Serenity Now
7/28/2015, 12:37 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/30/politics/obama-approval-rating-cnn-poll/

I think it would be close. Once Jade Helm kicks in and martial law is imposed it's not an issue. :)

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
7/28/2015, 01:36 PM
What a focktard... Has no clue of his standing in this country...nor what constitutes "good"

TheHumanAlphabet
7/28/2015, 01:36 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/30/politics/obama-approval-rating-cnn-poll/

I think it would be close. Once Jade Helm kicks in and martial law is imposed it's not an issue. :)

Hilarious, you quote the Clinton News Network...

REDREX
7/28/2015, 01:44 PM
Obama is an arrogant fool

TAFBSooner
7/28/2015, 01:47 PM
This f&*cking guy....



http://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-im-a-pretty-good-president-and-if-i-ran-for-a-third-term-i-could-win/

If you've been keeping track:

Reagan wanted a third term.

I never heard of Bush (41) making such a comment, but then he had already been CIA director. A little less power, but probably a lot more room to maneuver.

B Clinton wanted a third term.

Bush (43) wanted to be a dictator.

The power (and I suppose the perks) of being POTUS has to be extremely addicting. The two-term limit on the presidency is one of the better features of our political system.

SicEmBaylor
7/28/2015, 01:55 PM
Honestly, I don't see why he should let the law stop him at this point. It hasn't yet.

champions77
7/28/2015, 01:56 PM
In view of the many times he's crapped on the Constitution, ( I guess when it's a flawed document, it's ok) to say he doesn't leave office in January 2017 is not that much of a stretch. At least it's not as far fetched as it was in January 2009.

The next time a Presidential Candidate tells us that he wants to "fundamentally transform this Country" we damn better believe him..or her.

The label that JC Watt's attached to Jesse Jackson and AL Sharpton shortly after he was elected to the US Congress, referring to them both as "race hustling poverty pimps" is equally appropriate to BHO. His record on civil rights "bias" and his apparent indifference to the high numbers of Americans on government assistance substantiate that claim.

Used to be that number of Americans working, and the number of Americans on welfare were report cards as to the success of a Presidency. Not now apparently. Workforce participation rates are the lowest since 1979 and the number of Americans on food stamps are close to the all time highs set by this Administration.

It is truly pathetic when a political party looks at creating dependency as a way to gain power, but that's exactly what the Democratic Party is today. When is the last time you heard a Democratic Party candidate talk about reducing dependency? They don't, because they go out of their way to create more of it.

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
7/28/2015, 02:03 PM
Honestly, I don't see why he should let the law stop him at this point. It hasn't yet.I don't think he wants to do anything that would cause civil war/revolt. At least not yet. Of course, there's no certainty it would happen if he stays on, but he might think that would be too risky.

SicEmBaylor
7/28/2015, 02:07 PM
I try not to play the name calling game with politicians that I don't like. What I like to do is at least make some compelling argument against the individual beyond the fact that they are an absolute worthless sack of **** like the current President.

But it's impossible with Obama. There were more than a few of his 2008 campaign promises that I looked forward to. His promises to have the most transparent government in history, vowing to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, a return to civil liberties lost as a result of the Patriot Act and War on Terror, better fiscal discipline, etc. etc. Not only did he fail in the overwhelming majority of his campaign promises -- he doubled down on doing the absolute total opposite of what he promised.

He's a useless supremely arrogant self-righteous sack of **** who cares not one iota about either Constitutional or statutory law. He feels above the law as written and passed by the representatives of the people and the states assembled in Congress, and his determination to rule by executive fiat is the most startlingly tyrannical actions by a President since 1861. Rather than bring Americans together, he has divided us along racial and socio-economic lines in ways that may very well lead to the unraveling of the country as a whole. His disdain and utter contempt for traditional American values and those citizens who believe in the same is something I've never seen from a President.

His administration has so few redeemable qualities that the only way to improve his image over time is to totally wipe his administration from future history books. Ignorance is bliss.

TAFBSooner
7/28/2015, 02:18 PM
Honestly, I don't see why he should let the law stop him at this point. It hasn't yet.

I don't think he will try any such thing. I wonder, however, if the training of the Secret Service POTUS detail covers that scenario.

champions77
7/28/2015, 02:20 PM
I try not to play the name calling game with politicians that I don't like. What I like to do is at least make some compelling argument against the individual beyond the fact that they are an absolute worthless sack of **** like the current President.

But it's impossible with Obama. There were more than a few of his 2008 campaign promises that I looked forward to. His promises to have the most transparent government in history, vowing to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, a return to civil liberties lost as a result of the Patriot Act and War on Terror, better fiscal discipline, etc. etc. Not only did he fail in the overwhelming majority of his campaign promises -- he doubled down on doing the absolute total opposite of what he promised.

He's a useless supremely arrogant self-righteous sack of **** who cares not one iota about either Constitutional or statutory law. He feels above the law as written and passed by the representatives of the people and the states assembled in Congress, and his determination to rule by executive fiat is the most startlingly tyrannical actions by a President since 1861. Rather than bring Americans together, he has divided us along racial and socio-economic lines in ways that may very well lead to the unraveling of the country as a whole. His disdain and utter contempt for traditional American values and those citizens who believe in the same is something I've never seen from a President.

His administration has so few redeemable qualities that the only way to improve his image over time is to totally wipe his administration from future history books. Ignorance is bliss.

Wow, great prose there SicEm. Very well stated!

Sooner in Tampa
7/28/2015, 02:41 PM
I try not to play the name calling game with politicians that I don't like. What I like to do is at least make some compelling argument against the individual beyond the fact that they are an absolute worthless sack of **** like the current President.

But it's impossible with Obama. There were more than a few of his 2008 campaign promises that I looked forward to. His promises to have the most transparent government in history, vowing to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, a return to civil liberties lost as a result of the Patriot Act and War on Terror, better fiscal discipline, etc. etc. Not only did he fail in the overwhelming majority of his campaign promises -- he doubled down on doing the absolute total opposite of what he promised.

He's a useless supremely arrogant self-righteous sack of **** who cares not one iota about either Constitutional or statutory law. He feels above the law as written and passed by the representatives of the people and the states assembled in Congress, and his determination to rule by executive fiat is the most startlingly tyrannical actions by a President since 1861. Rather than bring Americans together, he has divided us along racial and socio-economic lines in ways that may very well lead to the unraveling of the country as a whole. His disdain and utter contempt for traditional American values and those citizens who believe in the same is something I've never seen from a President.

His administration has so few redeemable qualities that the only way to improve his image over time is to totally wipe his administration from future history books. Ignorance is bliss.

This may be one of the single greatest replies you have ever had.

You mentioned his 2008 campaign promises and failures...and yet this muther got reelected...low information voters rule this country.

champions77
7/28/2015, 02:41 PM
I don't think he will try any such thing. I wonder, however, if the training of the Secret Service POTUS detail covers that scenario.

Picture an event similar to 9/11 late in the Messiah's term. I could easily see him stay on with the excuse that "the country needs continuity of leadership at this "critical time" and to change Administrations now would not be in the best interest of this Nation, nor would it be fair to the incoming President"

Scary how "Obama" those words sound.

Serenity Now
7/28/2015, 02:49 PM
Sic'em: "his determination to rule by executive fiat"....Are you referencing executive orders?

Also, you realize that the crew here patting you on the back is critical of this President trying to get out of Afghanistan and Iraq despite the fact that he's following the timetable set up by the last guy.

Serenity Now
7/28/2015, 03:02 PM
Grover Cleveland is the last President with fewer executive orders per year. He left office in 1897.

champions77
7/28/2015, 03:08 PM
Sic'em: "his determination to rule by executive fiat"....Are you referencing executive orders?

Also, you realize that the crew here patting you on the back is critical of this President trying to get out of Afghanistan and Iraq despite the fact that he's following the timetable set up by the last guy.

I don't recall every one on here happy with everything W did. But do you know how disingenuous it sounds to hammer W on 99% of everything he did in his eight years, but when something doesn't work out so well, your position is that BHO just followed W's timetable?

Show me where W's position was to withdrawal 100% of all troops in Iraq? What your President did was exactly what he promised in his campaigns, have ALL troops out of Iraq. As I recall, it was brought up in Presidential debates with Mitt and he boasted about not leaving 10,000 troops behind.

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
7/28/2015, 03:11 PM
What caught my attention from Obear back in '08 was his stating that he would destroy the coal industry, his criticism of the use of fossil fuels and belief in man made global warming, and his promise to fundamentally change the country. Yes, he has kept some of his promises.

Serenity Now
7/28/2015, 03:13 PM
I don't recall every one on here happy with everything W did. But do you know how disingenuous it sounds to hammer W on 99% of everything he did in his eight years, but when something doesn't work out so well, your position is that BHO just followed W's timetable?

Show me where W's position was to withdrawal 100% of all troops in Iraq? What your President did was exactly what he promised in his campaigns, have ALL troops out of Iraq. As I recall, it was brought up in Presidential debates with Mitt and he boasted about not leaving 10,000 troops behind.

I was a W. supporter and still think he did some good things. I defended him AT LENGTH in a previous OU political message board. I actually voted for him at least once. I don't really remember who I voted for in 2000 but remembered that my vote really didn't mean much.

I'm talking about this thing signed by W. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.%E2%80%93Iraq_Status_of_Forces_Agreement

SicEmBaylor
7/28/2015, 03:16 PM
Grover Cleveland is the last President with fewer executive orders per year. He left office in 1897.

It isn't the number of executive orders that's the problem. Executive orders are a proper and even necessary tool for any President. The problem is, Executive orders were intended as a means by which the President executes the law as written by Congress. There are times when Congress fails to describe the methods or means by which a law is to be enforced -- for that, we have executive orders. They allow the President to create the framework by which he enforces the law.

This President's use of executive orders is entirely different. He has used them to defy the will of Congress, arbitrarily re-define statutory law, and most egregious...create law out of absolute thin air.

Serenity Now
7/28/2015, 03:46 PM
It isn't the number of executive orders that's the problem. Executive orders are a proper and even necessary tool for any President. The problem is, Executive orders were intended as a means by which the President executes the law as written by Congress. There are times when Congress fails to describe the methods or means by which a law is to be enforced -- for that, we have executive orders. They allow the President to create the framework by which he enforces the law.

This President's use of executive orders is entirely different. He has used them to defy the will of Congress, arbitrarily re-define statutory law, and most egregious...create law out of absolute thin air.

Thanks.

Tear Down This Wall
7/28/2015, 04:24 PM
Guys, of course he would win; but, it doesn't have anything to do with being a good president. The demographics are such that Ohio, Virginia, and Florida are no longer in play for Republicans. So, it doesn't matter who the Democrats or Republicans run, the Democrat will win.

It will eventually be the same in America as it is in places like Venezuela - the poor and stupid so far outnumber the sane and responsible that you have Chavez and Bus Driver being elected and re-elected time after time...no matter how poorly the country is faring!

Castro never lost an election in Cuba despite running it into the ground for decades. It was never his problem - it was the United States' fault. There is always someone else to blame for bad socialist policy - "the rich."

This has already happened in 2012 here. In 2016, you will hear the same theme: economy isn't doing well/not growing as fast as it should, underemployment/unemployment...but, it's the fault of "the rich" not the people in power.

As long as there enough poor and stupid to sell jealousy to, the Democrats will win. It doesn't matter that they run the country down. Look no further than Detroit for the model as well - city run into the ground, idiots there still vote for the Democrats that put them there.

This isn't rocket science, folks. The poor and stupid simply outnumbered everyone else now in the states that count. You can thank the Bushes, Clinton, and Obama and their collective immigration policies for it.

Tear Down This Wall
7/28/2015, 04:30 PM
Again, reference Idiocracy. Look at Venezuela's bus driver president and Idiocracy president Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. Venezuela is just ahead of us as far as electing 110% Idiocracy types.

We are getting closer, though. Obama had a paper thin background. At least the bus driver in Venezuela really had a job one time driving a bus. That's one more job than Obama ever had.

We're getting there, folks. Just be prepared.

Serenity Now
7/28/2015, 05:13 PM
Again, reference Idiocracy. Look at Venezuela's bus driver president and Idiocracy president Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. Venezuela is just ahead of us as far as electing 110% Idiocracy types.

We are getting closer, though. Obama had a paper thin background. At least the bus driver in Venezuela really had a job one time driving a bus. That's one more job than Obama ever had.

We're getting there, folks. Just be prepared.

So, I'm going to label you "glass half empty". :)

champions77
7/28/2015, 05:37 PM
Guys, of course he would win; but, it doesn't have anything to do with being a good president. The demographics are such that Ohio, Virginia, and Florida are no longer in play for Republicans. So, it doesn't matter who the Democrats or Republicans run, the Democrat will win.

It will eventually be the same in America as it is in places like Venezuela - the poor and stupid so far outnumber the sane and responsible that you have Chavez and Bus Driver being elected and re-elected time after time...no matter how poorly the country is faring!

Castro never lost an election in Cuba despite running it into the ground for decades. It was never his problem - it was the United States' fault. There is always someone else to blame for bad socialist policy - "the rich."

This has already happened in 2012 here. In 2016, you will hear the same theme: economy isn't doing well/not growing as fast as it should, underemployment/unemployment...but, it's the fault of "the rich" not the people in power.

As long as there enough poor and stupid to sell jealousy to, the Democrats will win. It doesn't matter that they run the country down. Look no further than Detroit for the model as well - city run into the ground, idiots there still vote for the Democrats that put them there.

This isn't rocket science, folks. The poor and stupid simply outnumbered everyone else now in the states that count. You can thank the Bushes, Clinton, and Obama and their collective immigration policies for it.

Wow, great post and 100% the truth.
Keep thinking that the country will wake up, but too many on the government teat. Too many don't vote, too many are Clueless. Too many that don't hold the offending party liable for their misdeeds and missteps.

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
7/28/2015, 05:38 PM
Again, reference Idiocracy. Look at Venezuela's bus driver president and Idiocracy president Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. Venezuela is just ahead of us as far as electing 110% Idiocracy types.

We are getting closer, though. Obama had a paper thin background. At least the bus driver in Venezuela really had a job one time driving a bus. That's one more job than Obama ever had.

We're getting there, folks. Just be prepared.It should be getting clearer to those who doubt or even scream in rage, the republican candidate MUST win the election in '16, for us to have even a chance to carry on peacefully.

yermom
7/28/2015, 09:18 PM
I'm with sicem until the blind rage of opinion starts in the 3rd paragraph

And Rush, you got a candidate hidden away somewhere that isn't a clown?

I don't see anyone so far that can handle Hilary, and that makes me sad.

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
7/29/2015, 12:54 AM
And Rush, you got a candidate hidden away somewhere that isn't a clown?

I don't see anyone so far that can handle Hilary, and that makes me sad.Both of those statements are absurd, and it's sad for you if you really think what you said there.

SicEmBaylor
7/29/2015, 01:38 AM
I'm with sicem until the blind rage of opinion starts in the 3rd paragraph

And Rush, you got a candidate hidden away somewhere that isn't a clown?

I don't see anyone so far that can handle Hilary, and that makes me sad.

2/3 right 100% of the time!

yermom
7/29/2015, 07:10 AM
Both of those statements are absurd, and it's sad for you if you really think what you said there.

haha!

olevetonahill
7/29/2015, 07:54 AM
I dont read much Political crap but is Billiary really shrinking in the Poles?
Could good old Uncle Joe be the Dem Nominee?

FaninAma
7/29/2015, 09:17 AM
Obama and his department of (in)justice has done an incredible amount of damage to the rule of law and respect for government entities in this country. He has lowered the bar of ethical behavior for all future administrations. In fact, I think the Democrats and media owe Richard Nixon a heart felt apology for his impeachment. I seriously doubt the damage done by this tin horn, incompetent community organizer will ever be repaired.

Sooner in Tampa
7/29/2015, 10:25 AM
Obama and his department of (in)justice has done an incredible amount of damage to the rule of law and respect for government entities in this country. He has lowered the bar of ethical behavior for all future administrations. In fact, I think the Democrats and media owe Richard Nixon a heart felt apology for his impeachment. I seriously doubt the damage done by this tin horn, incompetent community organizer will ever be repaired.

Nixon would not be impeached today in this political environment...

yermom
7/29/2015, 10:45 AM
Really?

Clinton couldn't lie about getting a BJ and you think the democrats would just let the sitting president get away with getting caught on Watergate? I mean they still call things "gates" and that was over 40 years ago

FaninAma
7/29/2015, 11:06 AM
Really?

Clinton couldn't lie about getting a BJ and you think the democrats would just let the sitting president get away with getting caught on Watergate? I mean they still call things "gates" and that was over 40 years ago
Are you ****ing ****ting me? The Democrats have allowed the IRS and other executive branch agencies to get away with destroying e-mails and entire hard drives. They have allowed Hillary to get away with deleting not just a few seconds of a recording but tens of thousands of e-mails off of a private server she shouldn't have been using in the first place. They have allowed this President and his NSA to expand exponentially George Bush's domestic spying programs started with the Patriot Act.

You can be an apologist for this secretive, opaque administration all you want but don't come back and whine when a GOP POTUS unleashes the IRS on his political enemies or convenintly destroys offical government e-mails and hard drives to get rid of evidence or condones the use of private servers to conduct officiao government business. Your partisan blindness is helping to create an environment where ideologic goals completely trump the rule of law. In other words, low information/expectation voters like yourself are turning this country into a bannana republic.

Sooner in Tampa
7/29/2015, 11:50 AM
Really?

Clinton couldn't lie about getting a BJ and you think the democrats would just let the sitting president get away with getting caught on Watergate? I mean they still call things "gates" and that was over 40 years ago

The apologists always want to downplay the entire situation. "He lied" is seriously downplaying what happened...Clinton committed perjury to a Grand Jury and (most likely) obstructed justice...as well abused his power as POTUS(more than likely)...and yet...

So yeah...Nixon would not be impeached in this current environment...a 2/3 majority is not possible in the Senate, the Dems are not crossing the aisles...

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
7/29/2015, 12:21 PM
Nixon would not be impeached today in this political environment...Well, he would probably quit due to the Media, just like he did in the 70's. He was a republican, y'know!

TAFBSooner
7/29/2015, 12:41 PM
Obama has learned some mad skills at trolling conservatives. Must be on his "rhymes with bucket" list.

BoulderSooner79
7/29/2015, 01:57 PM
Obama has learned some mad skills at trolling conservatives. Must be on his "rhymes with bucket" list.

And this thread is proof. Got his 2nd term swagger goin'

FaninAma
7/29/2015, 02:34 PM
And this thread is proof. Got his 2nd term swagger goin'

Yes, he has a lot to swagger about. The only thing he has accomplished that isn't temporary(i.e. reversible when the next GOP President is elected) is Obamacare and that is the gift that just keeps on giving to the Republicans. All of his federal judge nominations are tied up in Senate committee. All he has left is executive actions that are only effective until he leaves office and then his successor can wipe them out of existence.

So yes, about all he has left is trolling his opponents.

Serenity Now
7/29/2015, 02:59 PM
Good thing the other side was cooperating. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/nov/22/harry-reid/harry-reid-says-82-presidential-nominees-have-been/

olevetonahill
7/29/2015, 03:14 PM
Good thing the other side was cooperating. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/nov/22/harry-reid/harry-reid-says-82-presidential-nominees-have-been/

Lets see, Ya quote facts from Harry Reid. I believe every thing that man says!
All these that have been blocked can you at least admit they MIGHT have been totally wrong for whatever job he nominated them for?

Serenity Now
7/29/2015, 03:53 PM
Lets see, Ya quote facts from Harry Reid. I believe every thing that man says!
All these that have been blocked can you at least admit they MIGHT have been totally wrong for whatever job he nominated them for?

Oh, I'm sure there were some poor choices but the simple ACCURATE math that 50% of ALL senate blocks have happened to this President is laughable.

Serenity Now
7/29/2015, 03:56 PM
Lets see, Ya quote facts from Harry Reid. I believe every thing that man says!
All these that have been blocked can you at least admit they MIGHT have been totally wrong for whatever job he nominated them for?

http://www.upworthy.com/they-did-it-86-times-to-every-other-president-combined-82-times-to-obama-alone-6

BoulderSooner79
7/29/2015, 11:35 PM
.

So yes, about all he has left is trolling his opponents.

That's all I was talking about and that's the part I'm enjoying right now. It's all about me.

Serenity Now
7/29/2015, 11:45 PM
I like the line he used (paraphrased) "some of my critics would say that I'm visiting Kenya to find my original birth certificate..."

Eielson
7/30/2015, 12:00 AM
Obama is basically our Hitler/Stalin, except instead of having his opponents murdered with physical weapons, he's sending them all to an early grave with stress-related illnesses.

yermom
7/30/2015, 07:42 AM
so what has Obama done that is so terrible, what makes him the worst president ever that he has actually done vs. what some pundit says he's trying to do or is going to happen, etc...

what is it about Obamacare that has actually happened that is so terrible that isn't based on predictions?

FaninAma
7/30/2015, 09:35 AM
Oh, I'm sure there were some poor choices but the simple ACCURATE math that 50% of ALL senate blocks have happened to this President is laughable.
Maybe the POTUS should have spent a little time cultivating some type of non-antagonistic relationship with the GOP instead of trying to steamroll them at every opportunity. Maybe the Democrats could have put somebody into their Congressional leadership post less abrasive and confrontational than Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Obama has made a career out of pandering to the lowest expectations of his supporters and he never was able to grow beyond his hyper-partisan roots as a community organizer and product of the corrupt Chicago political machine.

This country deserves all the BS coming from Washington DC because ultimately we are the ones responsible for electing these clowns.

FaninAma
7/30/2015, 09:38 AM
Good thing the other side was cooperating. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/nov/22/harry-reid/harry-reid-says-82-presidential-nominees-have-been/
Tampa Bay Times

Sooner in Tampa
7/30/2015, 09:48 AM
so what has Obama done that is so terrible, what makes him the worst president ever that he has actually done vs. what some pundit says he's trying to do or is going to happen, etc...

what is it about Obamacare that has actually happened that is so terrible that isn't based on predictions?

What has Obama done that is so terrible? That is pretty easy...under his watch we have had Fast and the Furious, Benghazi, IRS profiling, the horrific Bergdahl deal, the Iran "agreement", race relations are at an all time low (Henry Lois Gates is a perfect example of his stupid racial views), and 6 1/2 into his presidency the defict is bonkers! And I can't believe how much of a whiny little bitch he is about Fox News...he sounds like a petulant child always complaining about them.

And since you brought up Obamacare...what huge cluster **** of a launch that was...amateur hour....and after that gaggle..."if you like your insurance, you can keep it" hahahaha, how did that work out for millions of Americans?

HIs failure to do ANYTHING about the Patriot Act, his failure to ANYTHING about immigration reform, and the sickening number of Americans on some form of Welfare...

Shall I continue?

REDREX
7/30/2015, 10:16 AM
What has Obama done that is so terrible? That is pretty easy...under his watch we have had Fast and the Furious, Benghazi, IRS profiling, the horrific Bergdahl deal, the Iran "agreement", race relations are at an all time low (Henry Lois Gates is a perfect example of his stupid racial views), and 6 1/2 into his presidency the defict is bonkers! And I can't believe how much of a whiny little bitch he is about Fox News...he sounds like a petulant child always complaining about them.

And since you brought up Obamacare...what huge cluster **** of a launch that was...amateur hour....and after that gaggle..."if you like your insurance, you can keep it" hahahaha, how did that work out for millions of Americans?

HIs failure to do ANYTHING about the Patriot Act, his failure to ANYTHING about immigration reform, and the sickening number of Americans on some form of Welfare...

Shall I continue?---Other that those things what has he done poorly-------Oh nevermind

TAFBSooner
7/31/2015, 11:05 AM
The apologists always want to downplay the entire situation. "He lied" is seriously downplaying what happened...Clinton committed perjury to a Grand Jury and (most likely) obstructed justice...as well abused his power as POTUS(more than likely)...and yet...

. . . all over a BJ. I wouldn't want the man around my daughter, but there are no politicians who are not morally blemished. Except James Lankford. He ran Falls Creek, so I know he has no skeletons in his closet.

TAFBSooner
7/31/2015, 11:10 AM
so what has Obama done that is so terrible, what makes him the worst president ever that he has actually done vs. what some pundit says he's trying to do or is going to happen, etc...

what is it about Obamacare that has actually happened that is so terrible that isn't based on predictions?

They can call him Worst President Ever(TM) for all I care; it's better than their claim he's not a "real" president.

But in my opinion, he's not even the worst president this century.

Serenity Now
7/31/2015, 11:21 AM
. . . all over a BJ. I wouldn't want the man around my daughter, but there are no politicians who are not morally blemished. Except James Lankford. He ran Falls Creek, so I know he has no skeletons in his closet.

http://www.thelostogle.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/fallin-lankford-kern-600x225.jpg

Turd_Ferguson
7/31/2015, 02:25 PM
He ran Falls Creek, so I know he has no skeletons in his closet.

Way to dance around...lib.

champions77
7/31/2015, 04:51 PM
They can call him Worst President Ever(TM) for all I care; it's better than their claim he's not a "real" president.

But in my opinion, he's not even the worst president this century.

"The worst President"? Requires a very subjective answer. To the leftists on here, he has been wonderful, promoting a radical far left agenda like no other. To others, he has been a colossal failure in so many ways, too many to recount here. For me his lies and deception in almost every facet of his Administration, all to promote his ideology, stand out.

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
7/31/2015, 07:27 PM
Bear is a dick...and, a colossal mistake by the economically and politically challenged of America.

Serenity Now
7/31/2015, 07:55 PM
Best president of this century!

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
8/1/2015, 12:16 AM
Best president of this century!see post #58.

BoulderSooner79
8/1/2015, 11:09 AM
Best president of this century!

Gotta love that low bar!

REDREX
8/1/2015, 11:39 AM
Gotta love that low bar!- It includes Bubba

olevetonahill
8/1/2015, 01:37 PM
Best president of this century!

He wouldnt be the best even if he was the ONLY one this century