PDA

View Full Version : Billary to Testify...



Turd_Ferguson
5/4/2015, 05:48 PM
I'm sure she's had enough mock run ups to this, that her and her crew thinks she's ready to lie her way through it...




Clinton agrees to testify this month before House committee on Benghazi, private emails

Published May 04, 2015FoxNews.com (http://www.foxnews.com/)


Facebook (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/04/clinton-agrees-to-testify-on-benghazi-emails-this-month/#)121 Twitter (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/04/clinton-agrees-to-testify-on-benghazi-emails-this-month/#)78 Email (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/04/clinton-agrees-to-testify-on-benghazi-emails-this-month/#) Print (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/04/clinton-agrees-to-testify-on-benghazi-emails-this-month/#)

http://a57.foxnews.com/global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/Politics/876/493/Clinton_Coakley.jpg?ve=1&tl=1 FILE: Oct. 24, 2014: Hillary Clinton at a rally for Democratic gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley, in Boston, Mass. (AP)


Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has agreed to testify on Capitol Hill this month about two controversial issues when she was secretary of state -- the fatal terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya, and using a private server and emails for official business, her attorney said Tuesday.
Attorney David Kendall said his client can appear before the House Select Committee on Benghazi as early as May 18.
In a letter to committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., Kendall said Clinton will testify “as long as possible” but made clear she won’t make separate appearances to testify about the two issues, as requested.
“The committee has consistently shown it is interested in getting the facts and doing so in a deliberate and diligent manner,” said committee spokesman Jamal D. Ware, who also made clear the offer to testify is still being considered.
“Chairman Gowdy should take yes for an answer and finally schedule the hearing,” said Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the committee. “Dragging out this process further into the presidential election season sacrifices any chance that the American people will see it as serious or legitimate.”
It remains unclear whether Clinton, a former first lady and U.S. senator from New York, will testify in a closed or open hearing before the special committee, formed to investigate the events surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attacks in which U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed.
Obama administration officials said in the early aftermath that the attacks were sparked by an anti-Islamic video but later acknowledged they were terror-related.
Clinton has already testified on the issue, answering such questions as whether adequate security was in place before the attacks and about the extent of U.S. intelligence about a possible attack.
“As you know, Secretary Clinton testified more than five hours before committees in both the House and Senate about the tragic events in Benghazi,” Kendall wrote. “Secretary Clinton remains ready to address whatever additional questions this committee may have.”
Cummings also said in his response that “we have still found not a scrap of evidence to support claims Secretary Clinton ordered a stand-down, approved an illicit weapons program, or any of the other wild allegations that Republicans have been making about her."
While Clinton’s role in the Benghazi incident is expected to remain an issue with some voters through the election cycle, the server and email issue has created problems for the early Clinton campaign.
News reports last month revealed that Clinton sent or received roughly 60,000 private emails while the country’s top diplomat from 2009 to 2013. However, she erased half of them, which she deemed private.
“Secretary Clinton is ready totestify in a public hearing at any time,” a spokesperson said Tuesday. “Given the fact that she has already testified previously on this very matter, the only reason the committee might seek to further prolong this inquiry would be to again exploit a tragedy for purely political purposes.”
Fox News' Chad Pergram contributed to this report.

Serenity Now
5/4/2015, 06:25 PM
My understanding is that she has had to press for this because the facts facts support her and it will get the issue out in the open as opposed to where the "vast right wing conspiracy" folks want it.

Turd_Ferguson
5/4/2015, 07:38 PM
My understanding is that she has had to press for this because the facts facts support her and it will get the issue out in the open as opposed to where the "vast right wing conspiracy" folks want it.

I'm quite sure your understanding is just that. How the **** is she gonna have "facts" that support her when she's deleted 30K + emails?

REDREX
5/4/2015, 08:21 PM
My understanding is that she has had to press for this because the facts facts support her and it will get the issue out in the open as opposed to where the "vast right wing conspiracy" folks want it.---How do the facts support her?

olevetonahill
5/4/2015, 09:44 PM
I'm quite sure your understanding is just that. How the **** is she gonna have "facts" that support her when she's deleted 30K + emails?


---How do the facts support her?

When there are NO facts!~
Oh like those Whitewater Billing records? Lying Yainch

TheHumanAlphabet
5/6/2015, 01:04 PM
Her "testimony" will be "What difference does it make..."

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
5/6/2015, 01:31 PM
Her "testimony" will be "What difference does it make..."We have to suppose that is rationale behavior in the minds of our board Left, as long as it's coming from the mouths of the leftist politicians.

hawaii 5-0
5/6/2015, 08:42 PM
A possible slippery slope for the Inquisition.

They wanted a closed hearing so they could get nasty. She's arguing for an open hearing for the witch hunt.

I hope it's televised.

5-0

olevetonahill
5/6/2015, 08:51 PM
A possible slippery slope for the Inquisition.

They wanted a closed hearing so they could get nasty. She's arguing for an open hearing for the witch hunt.

I hope it's televised.

5-0

Yer a real piece of werk aint ya? Witch Hunt? Inquisition?

Pretty sure everyone already Knows she a ****in WITCH ,Shes thumbed her nose at the Law and the American public since Before the Whitewater deal

http://news.yahoo.com/state-official-clinton-email-practices-not-acceptable-150527407--politics.html

Serenity Now
5/6/2015, 09:55 PM
A possible slippery slope for the Inquisition.

They wanted a closed hearing so they could get nasty. She's arguing for an open hearing for the witch hunt.

I hope it's televised.

5-0
But 5-0, why would she turn down a closed door hearing and only come to a public one? She had to push them to get this.

Serenity Now
5/6/2015, 09:56 PM
But 5-0, why would she turn down a closed door hearing and only come to a public one? She had to push them to get this.
That fact should linger like a stale fart. Why?

olevetonahill
5/6/2015, 10:13 PM
That Yainch is as Pure as the driven snow. Pure I tell ya Pure! Pure Bullshat!

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
5/7/2015, 01:11 AM
how can we evar forget her landmark speech the last time she ran for erection:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGDm4jkDbGQ

SicEmBaylor
5/7/2015, 01:16 AM
Her "testimony" will be "What difference does it make..."

To be fair, that quote has been taken entirely out of context. If you watch the actual hearing and testimony, it's very clear what she meant when she made the statement. She was growing frustrated by the redundancy of some of the questions (some fair and some not) when she said, "What difference does it make?" Followed by something along the lines of "...whatever the reasons for the riot, American lives were lost." She was saying that, in the end, it doesn't ultimately matter whether the consolute was attacked because of a YouTube video or it was planned because so many American lives were lost.

It really isn't fair to her to imply that her statement was a dismissal of the lives lost when her statement was the absolute total opposite. I don't like Clinton, but let's be fair.