PDA

View Full Version : That was not an INT


picasso
12/7/2013, 08:41 PM
He landed on Bester first, which meant he wasn't down until he hit the ground. Of course the ball then comes out.
Pretty obvious.
SoonerStormchaser
12/7/2013, 10:33 PM
Shh...don't tell that to Poke fans, they don't understand the rules.
Peeb
12/7/2013, 10:47 PM
It was obviously not an interception- the replay officials didn't even ask to look at it again.

No worries. You won because you earned it.

Congrats on a great win.
picasso
12/7/2013, 11:53 PM
It was obviously not an interception- the replay officials didn't even ask to look at it again.

No worries. You won because you earned it.

Congrats on a great win.
Well there were other iffy plays on both sides but one does not decide it all.
Thanks peeb!
okiewaker
12/8/2013, 03:27 PM
Actually I think it was a fumble.
OkieThunderLion
12/8/2013, 04:16 PM
Incomplete pass. If you go to the ground in the act of making a catch you can't let the ball go. Text book call for that ref.
SoCalBigRed
12/8/2013, 07:05 PM
The only reason(s) poke fans believe it was an INT are twofold. Wishful thinking and watching as Spielman called it (them all, actually)... a "bam, bam play", in slow-motion over and over again.

When you watch it live, it was clearly not in his possession. When you watch it 1/4 speed, of course, he was holding it for an eternity.