PDA

View Full Version : How will Pubs squander this opportunity?



BermudaSooner
4/24/2013, 02:28 PM
The Obama adminstration has decided to make a political statement by making traveling more painful these days and blaming the sequester. See the WSJ articles on it.

"Start with the Federal Aviation Administration, better known as the Postal Service without the modern technology. Flyers directly fund two-thirds of the FAA's budget through 17 airline taxes and fees—about 20% of the cost of a $300 domestic ticket, up from 7% in the 1970s. Yet now the White House wants to make this agency that can't deliver what passengers are supposedly paying for even more dysfunctional.

Ponder this logic, if that's the right word: The sequester cuts about $637 million from the FAA, which is less than 4% of its $15.9 billion 2012 budget, and it limits the agency to what it spent in 2010. The White House decided to translate this 4% cut that it has the legal discretion to avoid into a 10% cut for air traffic controllers. Though controllers will be furloughed for one of every 10 working days, four of every 10 flights won't arrive on time.

The FAA projects the delays will rob one out of every three travellers of up to four hours of their lives waiting at the major hubs. Congress passed a law in 2009 that makes such delays illegal, at least if they are the responsibility of an airline. Under President Obama's "passenger bill of rights," the carriers are fined millions of dollars per plane that sits on the tarmac for more than three hours. But sauce for the goose is apparently an open bar for the FAA gander".

Obama is trying to browbeat the Republicans to accept more tax increases. What a perfect opportunity for the Republicans to stand up and kick some ***...instead I expect them to roll over and play dead. How disappointing.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323735604578440981119902460.html?m od=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324874204578438913145965432.html?K EYWORDS=flight+delays+as+political+strategy

Fraggle145
4/24/2013, 03:21 PM
Obama is trying to browbeat the Republicans to accept more spending cuts.

Wait what? I thought republicans wanted more spending cuts?

Ohhhh... you just didnt want to cut the stuff that you think is important?

/confused.

badger
4/24/2013, 03:23 PM
Obama: Not all spending cuts will be painless.

Republicans respond: Not all gun incidents will result in gun legislation.

Are we just waiting to see who howls the most afterward?

Soonerjeepman
4/24/2013, 03:59 PM
I doubt the the American public will believe the pubs anyway...obama has done well in convincing folks it's all about the pubs not compromising. These are interesting facts, unfortunately the reg local news that most people watch won't show these stats.

BermudaSooner
4/25/2013, 08:22 AM
Wait what? I thought republicans wanted more spending cuts?

Ohhhh... you just didnt want to cut the stuff that you think is important?

/confused.

Ooops...meant browbeat into accepting more tax increases!

TFSooner
4/25/2013, 12:10 PM
Didn't read the entire artlice, but from what was included in the post, some of it was inaccurate, or at least misleading. 100% of the FAA's budget comes from user fees. Not only ticket taxes as explained in the article, but taxes on aviation fuel and airplanes tires. Not one penny for the FAA's budget comes from the general fund. So, if a person never flies, never buys aviation fuel, or never buys an airplane tire, they are not funding FAA.

yermom
5/1/2013, 09:43 PM
maybe the Pubs will run Santorum in 2016, that would probably do it

Blue
5/1/2013, 09:47 PM
Wait what? I thought republicans wanted more spending cuts?

Ohhhh... you just didnt want to cut the stuff that you think is important?

/confused.

I imagine there is money floating around out there that could be cut. But no, lets make a splash and hurt the economy. Our president is a grade A piece of ****.

And cut it Mr. President...all the way down to your weekly White House parties and ceremonies.

yermom
5/1/2013, 10:22 PM
but seriously, why not just dock their pay 10%?

buncha drama queens.