PDA

View Full Version : Oklahoma #2 in % of interracial marriages



TitoMorelli
11/18/2012, 11:42 PM
Just ran across this chart (Washington Post story linked, but doesn't talk about comparative states). The Sooner State apparently is second only to Hawaii in the percent of "intermarriages" out of total marriages.

And if I'm reading the bar graph correctly, the majority of those marriages aren't white/Hispanic, white/Asian or white/Black. Guess the number of white/werewolf marriages in the Tulsa area really tips the scale.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/02/16/SocialIssues-Religion-Immigration/Graphics/w-interracial.jpg

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/intermarriage-rates-soar-as-stereotypes-fall/2012/02/15/gIQAvyByGR_story.html?hpid=z2&tid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost

FirstandGoal
11/18/2012, 11:54 PM
So does Alaska and New Mexico just not have black people living there, or what?

olevetonahill
11/18/2012, 11:58 PM
I dont believe the different species should Inbreed :glee:

Soonerfan88
11/18/2012, 11:59 PM
And Maine has no Hispanics.

I assume the majority of Oklahoma's Other category are Native Americans.

FirstandGoal
11/19/2012, 12:03 AM
I'm kinda surpised at how many Asian people live in Kentucky.

FirstandGoal
11/19/2012, 12:05 AM
LOL, so who all thinks "other" is code for Aggy?


IN that case, I agree with Vet. NO inter-species breeding please!

SanJoaquinSooner
11/19/2012, 12:05 AM
I dont believe the different species should Inbreed :glee:

Do you mean they shouldn't crossbreed or do you mean they shouldn't marry their first cousin?

SicEmBaylor
11/19/2012, 12:54 AM
I'm opposed.

Chuck Bao
11/19/2012, 01:47 AM
Why should inter racial/national marriages bother anyone? Does life suck so bad that trying to denigerate and lessen others is the only thing that makes life seem a little better?

SicEmBaylor
11/19/2012, 02:13 AM
Why should inter racial/national marriages bother anyone? Does life suck so bad that trying to denigerate and lessen others is the only thing that makes life seem a little better?

It helps. ;)

Midtowner
11/19/2012, 02:38 AM
I'm opposed.

Why?

Breadburner
11/19/2012, 03:24 AM
Thank god they left out White/Sheep....!!!

LiveLaughLove
11/19/2012, 05:16 AM
How can that be? Oklahoma full of nothing but racists according to some on here.

olevetonahill
11/19/2012, 06:45 AM
How can that be? Oklahoma full of nothing but racists according to some on here.

I aint racist, I just dont like them people .:satellite:

SanJoaquinSooner
11/19/2012, 09:09 AM
How can that be? Oklahoma full of nothing but racists according to some on here.

probably half of oklahomans claim indian blood.

SanJoaquinSooner
11/19/2012, 09:16 AM
not a big fan of how the graph was constructed, with the proportional types of intermarraiges laid out like that.

Hawaii has a higher overall percentage of white/hispanic intermarriages than does vermont, but vermont's white/hispanic bar is way longer.

12% of 42.4% = 5% of Hawaii marriages are white/hispanic

60% of 4% = 2.4% of Vermont marriages are white/hispanic

cleller
11/19/2012, 10:07 AM
I bet Oklahoma is the white-indian thing. Been going on forever here.

FirstandGoal
11/19/2012, 10:23 AM
Why should inter racial/national marriages bother anyone? Does life suck so bad that trying to denigerate and lessen others is the only thing that makes life seem a little better?


LOL, its not bothering me at all. I just like poking fun of the graph.

Oh, but I was totally serious about that whole Aggy intermarrying thing. That **** needs to stop.

TitoMorelli
11/19/2012, 10:42 AM
And Maine has no Hispanics.

I assume the majority of Oklahoma's Other category are Native Americans.

Great point, 88.

SJS, I agree that the graph is poorly constructed. Took me awhile to figure out that all bars add up to 100%, with the neutral "other intermarriage types" color filling out the remaining % in each case.

KantoSooner
11/19/2012, 10:57 AM
I remember reading an anthro study back in college about endogamy vs. exogamy (marrying inside vs. marrying outside one's racial group/tribe/clan/nationality, etc). Apparently the majority marries inside it's group. Some indication is that this is partially just happenstance. When the hormones tell you it's time, you hook up with whoever's handy. But when comparing those who would not marry if a partner from within the group was not available vs. those who would not marry if a partner from outside the group was not available, there was a heavy bias in favor of exogamy. Something like 4:1 if memory serves.
The assumption at the time was that this was gene-driven behaviour and was a way to promote genetic diversity in the population.

Now, the extra twist was that, in comparing immigrants to those who stayed in their homelands, the bias in favor of exogamy roughly doubled.

Oklahoma and Hawaii having large majorities of people who moved there in the past hundred years would seem to support that data.

Those with the cojones to go try to find a better life are also more likely to marry outside their group.

Might we conclude that mixed race couples are probably composed of people who tend to be aggressive, self-reliant, brave, adventurous, take the bull by the horns self starters? The data might well support such a conclusion.

Oklahomans > Yankees > Euroweenies

It's very clear.

Science. Gotta love it.

JohnnyMack
11/19/2012, 11:58 AM
Does OleVet's big old sasquatch *** marrying someone count as interracial or interspecies?

C&CDean
11/19/2012, 12:11 PM
My first wife was Italian/Irish. Right down the middle. Her grandparents on both sides were 1st generation immigrants. That bitch was/is the most emotional wreck of a person I've ever had the displeasure to associate with. She started fights just so we could make up. Twisted yainch. I quit going to her family's house after one Christmas. They hug, start drinking, then start fighting. I mean serious fighting. Shoes thrown and ****. Insults like "you cannot talk to your mutha that way!" "why not, you're a terrible mutha!!" "How dare you talk to your mutha that way....WHACK!!" With a shoe.

She only came to my parents' house on one Thanksgiving. She said "how can you stand it here? Your family has no passion. No love." I go "you are one sick bitch." The marriage was 10 years of pure hell.

Anyhow, IDGAS who you marry or mate with. Just think about your offspring and what kinda **** they have to put up with. Little caramel babies used to have it rough. Nowadays? Not so much. Look no further than Blake/Kenny Stills/etc.

cleller
11/19/2012, 12:13 PM
Every state in that top five has an unusually high percentage of either Indians, Hispanics, Asians or Eskimos. Intermarriage is a natural expectation.

TitoMorelli
11/19/2012, 12:48 PM
I remember reading an anthro study back in college about endogamy vs. exogamy (marrying inside vs. marrying outside one's racial group/tribe/clan/nationality, etc). Apparently the majority marries inside it's group. Some indication is that this is partially just happenstance. When the hormones tell you it's time, you hook up with whoever's handy. But when comparing those who would not marry if a partner from within the group was not available vs. those who would not marry if a partner from outside the group was not available, there was a heavy bias in favor of exogamy. Something like 4:1 if memory serves.
The assumption at the time was that this was gene-driven behaviour and was a way to promote genetic diversity in the population.

Now, the extra twist was that, in comparing immigrants to those who stayed in their homelands, the bias in favor of exogamy roughly doubled.

Oklahoma and Hawaii having large majorities of people who moved there in the past hundred years would seem to support that data.

Those with the cojones to go try to find a better life are also more likely to marry outside their group.

Might we conclude that mixed race couples are probably composed of people who tend to be aggressive, self-reliant, brave, adventurous, take the bull by the horns self starters? The data might well support such a conclusion.

Oklahomans > Yankees > Euroweenies

It's very clear.

Science. Gotta love it.

Exception: seems that most white/black intermarriage in this state is between members of limited income background.

C&CDean
11/19/2012, 12:49 PM
Exception: seems that most white/black intermarriage in this state is between members of limited income background.

Why do you hate po people?

KantoSooner
11/19/2012, 12:53 PM
Exception: seems that most white/black intermarriage in this state is between members of limited income background.

Don't take me too seriously. I'm a ScotsIrishGermanCherokee who used to be married to a Japanese woman. I was about half tongue in cheek.

Not that I'd turn down a good natured nymphomaniac regardless of ethnic background, you understand.

TitoMorelli
11/19/2012, 12:57 PM
Why do you hate po people?

Don't hate 'em, just envy the black doods.

TitoMorelli
11/19/2012, 01:04 PM
Don't take me too seriously. I'm a ScotsIrishGermanCherokee who used to be married to a Japanese woman. I was about half tongue in cheek.

Not that I'd turn down a good natured nymphomaniac regardless of ethnic background, you understand.

So your biggest problem on a Saturday night is deciding whether to drink Dewar's, Jameson, Jägermeister, or Boones Farm? :)

KantoSooner
11/19/2012, 01:19 PM
It was confusing for many years. Sometimes, I got so bumfuzzled I didn't drink at all. Other times, I'd wake up in the front yard with 2 inches of snow covering my face and be all afeared that I'd finally done it and gone blind from drinking all of it together.

Then I finally got right with life and just concentrated on bourbon. Expensive bourbon when I am drinking with friends; cheap crap when it's just me and the dog watching sports on teevee.