PDA

View Full Version : Ole THA is correct again about The Socialist...



TheHumanAlphabet
10/21/2012, 11:23 AM
The Socialist takes illegal campaign contributions...Repeating 2008, you all know he did, even if the FEC couldn't definitively say he did...

Doesn't even try to check the veracity of the contribution... (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/bam_blind_eye_to_illegal_donors_8SWotytr1RvbhyDCRy yrEL)

Everything I have said is being proven about this cheat!

Skysooner
10/21/2012, 12:12 PM
Might want to check the veracity of the link.

TheHumanAlphabet
10/21/2012, 01:00 PM
What's wrong with it?

SouthCarolinaSooner
10/21/2012, 01:35 PM
NYP is just a sensationalist tabloid

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
10/21/2012, 01:39 PM
Heck Clinton did it all the time and got away with it. he even tried to install socialized medicine, which failed him big in '93, and caused massive wins in the house and senate in '94.

TheHumanAlphabet
10/21/2012, 02:26 PM
So all you libs have to say is the "news" source is bad, but nothing about the actual story or the fraud perpetrated by The Socialist? You all fail!

and the lame stream media is truth, or a good source... You all jest!

mhackl
10/21/2012, 03:17 PM
You lost me at nypost.com

TheHumanAlphabet
10/21/2012, 03:44 PM
Yeah, don't like the story, discredit the source...

The crickets are chirping about a true response about the issue at hand, The Socalist cheats and is accepting illegal contributions.

sappstuf
10/21/2012, 04:08 PM
It is really the same story as the Washington Post story back in 2008..

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803413.html

The Washington Post is a sensationalist tabloid in 3..2..1..

Skysooner
10/21/2012, 04:24 PM
What's wrong with it?

Apparently nothing. Sorry. It loaded as a bad link on my tablet, but sometimes the tablets will load badly.

FaninAma
10/22/2012, 04:32 PM
NYP is just a sensationalist tabloid

Here's a little FYI for you: 99% of the news media is biased one way or the other. If you think the sources you agree with aren't then you are naive. I would like to hear why you think it is okay for the Obama campaign to not try and veerify the country of origin of credit card donations since it is simple to do so.