PDA

View Full Version : Social Justice Quiz 2012: 13 Questions



SoonerPride
1/31/2012, 04:14 PM
This is not only sad, but might spark some good discussion.

Let's see how well you do.

I only got 50% of these right.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-quigley/social-justice-quiz_b_1241375.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&


Question One. The combined pay of the 299 highest paid CEOs in the U.S. is enough to support how many median salary jobs?

45,000? 83,000? 102,325?

Two. The median net worth of black households in the U.S. is $2,200. What is the median net worth of white households in the U.S.?

$4,400? $44,000? $97,000?

Three. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development issues a national survey every year listing fair market rents for every county in the U.S. HUD also suggests renters should pay no more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs. In how many of the USA's 3068 counties can someone who works full-time and earns the federal minimum wage pay 30 percent of their income and find a one-bedroom apartment at the fair market rental amount?

19? 368? 1974?

Four. How much must the typical U.S. worker earn per hour to rent a two-bedroom apartment if that worker dedicates thirty percent of his income, as HUD suggests, to rent and utilities?

$9.39? $14.63? $18.46?

Five. The wealthiest 1 percent of the U.S. has a net worth which is how many times greater than the median or typical household's net worth?

50? 150? 225?

Six. Which of these countries puts the highest percentage of their people in jails and prisons?

China? Iran? Iraq? Germany? Russia? USA?

Seven. In 2012, the U.S. will pay out about $620 billion for old age Social Security benefits to 45 million families. How much is budgeted for military spending by the U.S. in 2012?

$310 billion? $620 billion? $836 billion?

Eight. The U.S. is number one in the world in military spending. How much more does the U.S. spend compared to the top 15 countries in the world in military spending?

More than any 2 other countries combined? More than any 5 other countries combined? More than all the rest of the 15 top military spending countries combined?

Nine. How many people in the world live on less than $1.25 a day?

150 million? 500 million? Over 1 billion?

Ten. How many people in the world live without electricity?

500 million? One billion? One and half billion?

Eleven. The U.S. government donates over $30 billion a year in official development assistance (foreign aid) to poor countries. Where does that rank the U.S. government in percentage of giving among the richest 23 countries?

First? Tenth? Nineteenth?

Twelve. The U.S. government donates over $30 billion a year to poor countries. How much do U.S. consumers spend on pets and pet supplies each year?

$10 billion? $30 billion? $67 billion?

Thirteen. The poverty rate among children in the U.S. is over 20 percent. How does U.S. compare with the rest of the 30 nations surveyed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development?

First? Tenth? Twenty-sixth?

Answers to Social Justice Quiz 2012:

One. The combined pay of the top 299 CEOs is enough to support 102,325 average jobs. Source: Corporate Paywatch.

Two. The median net worth of white households in the US is $97,900. Source: Economic Policy Institute.

Three. Except for eleven counties in Illinois and another eight in Puerto Rico, there is no county in the US where a one bedroom fair market rate apartment is available to a person working full-time at the minimum wage. Source: The National Low Income Housing Coalition.

Four. The typical worker must earn $18.46 an hour to rent a two bedroom apartment. Source: National Low Income Housing Coalition.

Five. In the last numbers reported, the top 1 percent had net worth 225 times greater than the median or typical household's net worth, the highest ever recorded. Source: Economic Policy Institute.

Six. The rate of incarceration per 100,000 people is: USA 730, Russian 534, Iran 334, China 122, Iraq 101, and Germany 86. Source: International Centre for Prison Studies, University of Essex.

Seven. $836 billion. Over $713 billion on military programs and another $123 for veterans affairs. Source: US Office of Management and Budget, Fiscal Year 2012.

Eight. The US spends $100 billion more on our military than the next highest 15 countries combined. More than China, UK, France, Russia, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Germany, India, Italy, Brazil, South Korea, Australia, Canada and Turkey combined. Source: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2011 Yearbook.

Nine. 1.4 billion people live on less than $1.25 a day. Source: United National Development Program, Human Development Report 2010.

Ten. One and half billion people, more than one of every five people in the world, live without electricity. Source: United Nations Development Program, Human Development Report 2011.

Eleven. US government ranks 19th out of 23 countries in assistance to poor nations, giving about two-tenths of one percent of US gross national income to poor countries. Source: Global Issues: Foreign Aid for Development Assistance.

Twelve. US consumers spend $67 billion each year on pets, pet products and services. Source: US Census Bureau 2012 Statistical Abstract.

Thirteen. The US poverty rate among children ranks the US 26th among 30 nations in the rate of poverty among children. Source: Poverty among children. OECD.

Ton Loc
1/31/2012, 05:53 PM
That was an easy test - all you have to do is pick the most extreme choice for every question. It is a huffington post quiz titled Social Injustice quiz after all.

Even so, those stats are pretty shocking, they didn't really need to do the quiz part.

XingTheRubicon
1/31/2012, 06:23 PM
Fourteen: The amount of poor people in the history of Earth who became wildly successful and wealthy by bitching and moaning about rich people.


Eight. Zero. Eleven. None.

SCOUT
1/31/2012, 06:46 PM
Fourteen: The amount of poor people in the history of Earth who became wildly successful and wealthy by bitching and moaning about rich people.


Eight. Zero. Eleven. None.
1. Michael Moore
2. Jesse Jackson
3. Al Sharpton
4. Ralph Nader

I am going to go with 8

SoonerPride
1/31/2012, 06:50 PM
Fourteen: The amount of poor people in the history of Earth who became wildly successful and wealthy by bitching and moaning about rich people.


Eight. Zero. Eleven. None.

Don't really see what your point is. Pointing out what the economic priorities of our country are seems to have little to do with whatever you're trying to say.

But I appreciate your contribution.

dwarthog
1/31/2012, 07:08 PM
There is certainly plenty to be said about that piece of work.

For example, the good folks at AFL/CIO were the source of the data for the first question, no axe to grind there. http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/

Question two's data source isn't much better. That org's board is another union hangout. Not much guessing required to figure out which way they lean.

Question 13 is the doozy though, and an embarrassment to "progressives" everywhere since the war on poverty, started back in the 60's and trillions of dollars spent, is an abject failure apparently.

Turd_Ferguson
1/31/2012, 07:24 PM
Don't really see what your point is. Pointing out what the economic priorities of our country are seems to have little to do with whatever you're trying to say.

But I appreciate your contribution.Whatever, clown pants.

SoonerPride
1/31/2012, 07:28 PM
You are right. It is a sad attempt at journalism.

Hmmm. Interesting take.

So no qualms about spending more on bombs and bases around the world than the next 15 countries combined?

I have a serious issue with it.

It is clear that our priorities are out if whack. We need a change of course

Neither party seems very committed to change though because both are bought and paid for by corporations.

olevetonahill
1/31/2012, 07:42 PM
I missed 2. Like has been said Pick the most outrageous sounding an go with that.
The 2 I missed I under guessed

If this isnt one of the most Slanted "tests" ill KYA.

badger
1/31/2012, 07:42 PM
Yeah, I caught on pretty fast that the questions were loaded.

It's like me having "Incarcerated mothers break up families and hurt children" quiz here.

1. Which state has the highest per capita incarceration rate for women?
a) California
b) Texas
c) New York
d) Oklahoma

The answer is (d) Oklahoma. OMG! It's us? I had no idea! Oklahoma incarcerates women! They are mothers! What about the children? Oh, heavens!

:( On a sad note, that actually is true.

SoonerAtKU
2/1/2012, 12:12 PM
Yes, it became abundantly clear what the message was and what the answers to those would be. I was certainly shocked to see that large a disparity in median income between black and white families in the US. You expect some distance, but that was far more extreme than I would have assumed.

You can't just assume causation from correlation, but if that doesn't call into question how we're doing as an inclusive nation of diverse groups...

SoonerPride
2/1/2012, 01:00 PM
Whatever, clown pants.

I like my pants, thank you.

........and technically they're parachute pants.

OU68
2/1/2012, 01:45 PM
Number thirteen is the most disturbing to me, especially in Oklahoma. How we can have one in five kids going to bed hungry is just hard for me to accept.

Bourbon St Sooner
2/1/2012, 01:52 PM
Yes, it became abundantly clear what the message was and what the answers to those would be. I was certainly shocked to see that large a disparity in median income between black and white families in the US. You expect some distance, but that was far more extreme than I would have assumed.

You can't just assume causation from correlation, but if that doesn't call into question how we're doing as an inclusive nation of diverse groups...

Is says a lot about how gov't social engineering has destroyed the inner cities.

Ton Loc
2/1/2012, 01:53 PM
Number thirteen is the most disturbing to me, especially in Oklahoma. How we can have one in five kids going to bed hungry is just hard for me to accept.

I'd like to know how they come by those numbers...

Still sucks though even if it was 1 in 100

SoonerPride
2/1/2012, 02:07 PM
I'd like to know how they come by those numbers...

Still sucks though even if it was 1 in 100

It appears to come from this 312 page document produced by and for OECD countries...

...with lots of scholarly footnotes and data inputs...

enjoy! :)

http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/social-issues-migration-health/growing-unequal_9789264044197-en

Sooner98
2/2/2012, 02:17 PM
Question:

What percentage of liberals are constantly outraged that the United States is a country where its freedom allows its citizens to make as much money as they darn well please, with individual results almost always based on skill level, education, intelligence, motivation, creativity/ingenuity, and personal choices?

A) 0%
B) 0.5%
C) 1%
D) 99.8%

SoonerPride
2/2/2012, 02:36 PM
Question:

What percentage of liberals are constantly outraged that the United States is a country where its freedom allows its citizens to make as much money as they darn well please, with individual results almost always based on skill level, education, intelligence, motivation, creativity/ingenuity, and personal choices?

A) 0%
B) 0.5%
C) 1%
D) 99.8%

A. 0

But we are outraged when people are given $100,000,000 from daddy and pay no taxes on it. http://www.americablog.com/2012/01/romney-gave-100-million-to-his-sons.html

Midtowner
2/2/2012, 02:57 PM
Question:

What percentage of liberals are constantly outraged that the United States is a country where its freedom allows its citizens to make as much money as they darn well please, with individual results almost always based on skill level, education, intelligence, motivation, creativity/ingenuity, and personal choices?

A) 0%
B) 0.5%
C) 1%
D) 99.8%

Nice attempted straw man. Some liberals, I'm sure have a problem with that. I'm sure the commies do. That said, the vast majority of us, let's say the more aggressive, pragmatic moderates, have no problem with people being upwardly mobile based upon their contribution to society, which is most accurately reflected in their paycheck. That said, those at the top have rigged the system against the rest of us. Our wealth is constantly confiscated to pay for a military which doesn't really protect the United States, but rather the interests of multinational conglomerates who need oil, trade stability, etc. We have an SEC which is supposed to regulate Wall Street, but they've been so underfunded that their legal counsel actually has to go out to Kinko's because there's not money in their budget for internal copiers. We have an EPA which is totally unable to adequately do its job.

Most folks are for opportunity and are happy to see worth folks like Mitt Romney rewarded. It's just that the playing field is not level and the folks at the top who are rewarded pay nowhere close to the same % of their income as the middle class.

KABOOKIE
2/2/2012, 03:20 PM
A. 0

But we are outraged when people are given $100,000,000 from daddy and pay no taxes on it. http://www.americablog.com/2012/01/romney-gave-100-million-to-his-sons.html


Johnston: The Romneys gave $100 million to their sons and paid not one penny of gift tax. They were able to take assets they have that are producing enormous income and, under the law, give that money to their children and not pay any taxes on it.

Don't hate. Change the tax code.

SoonerPride
2/2/2012, 04:05 PM
Don't hate. Change the tax code.

Who do you think changed the tax code to get away with this in the first place?

Whet
2/2/2012, 04:11 PM
we will see quite a bit more of this propaganda from the Obama camp and his minions, so we may as well get used to it.

class warfare and trying a populist themed yellow journalism are the leftists mainstay of campaigning. well, after that, comes the voter fraud...

SoonerPride
2/2/2012, 04:16 PM
we will see quite a bit more of this propaganda from the Obama camp and his minions, so we may as well get used to it.

class warfare and trying a populist themed yellow journalism are the leftists mainstay of campaigning. well, after that, comes the voter fraud...

Oh make no mistake there is class warfare.

And you, my friend, are getting killed.

http://media.economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/original-size/20111029_WOC689.gif

KABOOKIE
2/2/2012, 04:16 PM
Who do you think changed the tax code to get away with this in the first place?

Politicians? You're not a bright person are you? Stupid and mad is no way to go through life.

KABOOKIE
2/2/2012, 04:24 PM
Oh make no mistake there is class warfare.

And you, my friend, are getting killed.

http://media.economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/original-size/20111029_WOC689.gif

You've never heard the phrase, "It takes money to make money"

olevetonahill
2/2/2012, 04:35 PM
What some of the Libs aint payin tention to is that the USA is a Freee Country
We have the Freedom to pursue riches and find Happiness. We also have the Freedom to Be a bunch of lazy assed slobs who wont work and will let our kids go hungry at night . Then Cry about the Rich

SoonerPride
2/2/2012, 04:50 PM
Politicians? You're not a bright person are you? Stupid and mad is no way to go through life.

And who bribed the politicians?

the Patricians.

The system is rigged and the super wealthy are robbing the middle class blind.

But, you, know, that's the American way!

SoonerPride
2/2/2012, 04:51 PM
What some of the Libs aint payin tention to is that the USA is a Freee Country
We have the Freedom to pursue riches and find Happiness. We also have the Freedom to Be a bunch of lazy assed slobs who wont work and will let our kids go hungry at night . Then Cry about the Rich

I thought you promised not to argue politics?

hmmm.

Whet
2/2/2012, 08:13 PM
With these slanted articles coming out, it is a good time to read the following - it will give you some insight into why these articles are written:

Yes, we can! (http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/21/obama-wins-and-journolisters-rejoice/)

StoopTroup
2/2/2012, 11:12 PM
When it comes to private equity firms and "The Carry" Mitt Romney would have paid 4.5 million in taxes rather than the 1.9 he paid. Now....I'm not complaining about the rich but I am complaining about a guy that takes advantage of the rule but knew about it because of his old Company Bain lobbied Congress to get the new law squashed that would have required him to pay the 4.5 Million. You can't run for POTUS and say you are for reducing taxes and then only support the loopholes that benefit yourself. It comes off as class warfare and really just another rich guy who doesn't give a **** about Americans. If maybe he could even talk about the jobs he created with the extra 2.6 million he saved from using that loophole.

It just serves to support my feelings to not trust him or any Politcian that talks out both sides of their ***.

StoopTroup
2/2/2012, 11:26 PM
Funny as hell to watch Aasif Mandvi from the Daily Show ask the Florida Governor and Representative Scott Plakon if they would submit to a pee test.

They both basically side stepped his requests.

Now a Federal Judge has temporarily blocked mandatory drug testing in Phlorida for them....lol

Even if they both were clean and could pass a test...it's obvious they would **** off all of their peers who might not be able to pass and basically if they were to pee in a cup...they would be promoting that they all have to subscribe to a Drug Test. It's good enough for hard Working Americans but not for them.

I love the old Harvard School of Business saying that good managers should never ask their employees to do something they weren't will to do themselves.

If you want to know what's really wrong in America....we will all push to see this Harvard Standard put back into place. We have stuff going on that's much worse than class warfare.

TUSooner
2/3/2012, 09:18 AM
Heh, Bill Quigley taught a class at Loyola Law school (maybe still does) called "Law & Poverty." It was required, so I took it. Of course, Bill is a rather extreme and unapologetic share-"your"-wealth liberal, who seemed to have some dodgy ideas about how noble and deserving poor people intrinsically are. But still, he busted some myths and genuinely encouraged even libertarians and conservatives to seriously consider the plight of people whom life has dealt a poor hand. And such people exist: Contrary to what some of the more self-righteous and ideologically rigid right-wingers claim, not all poverty, illness, and financial misfortune is the result of people not being as virtuous as their critics.

I also sang in a church choir with his son, who is a great guy and has a great voice and didn't talk politics. :biggrin: