Fraggle145
11/16/2011, 06:36 PM
...you can't ignore the weak offenses.
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7241966/the-sec-loaded-great-defenses-ignore-weak-offenses-cfb
The SEC's offense problem
The league's defenses are the nation's best. But on the other side of the ball ...
By Brock Huard
ESPN Insider
Last week, many of you took exception to my argument that an undefeated Boise State Broncos team was deserving of a shot at the BCS title game and capable of beating the SEC's elite teams on a neutral field. The Broncos then went out and lost to the TCU Horned Frogs, done in by TCU's pass offense and yet another critical missed field goal, ending the debate over whether Boise should get a national championship opportunity this season.
But one aspect of my argument that remains unchanged even after the Broncos' loss is that the extent of the SEC's dominance this season has been inflated. At the center of this issue is the fact that even though there's no questioning the quality of the conference's defenses, the SEC is a league full of very weak offenses.
Before I discuss the offenses, though, let's give credit where credit is due. Objectively speaking, the SEC is without question the best defensive conference in college football and has been for many years. The players, especially those on the defensive front, are collectively head and shoulders above those of any other conference in America. More defenders from the SEC play on Sundays than from any other conference, and the adage "offenses win games, defenses win championships" has certainly held true down South, with the conference boasting the last five national champions.
But especially when looking at the quality of SEC teams this season, it seems only fair to apply the one factor that comes up in nearly every college football debate this time of year: strength of competition.
Part of this has the feel of a "chicken and the egg" debate, as great defenses can make offenses look bad just as easily as bad offenses can make defenses look great. But consider the numbers: The SEC has six of its 12 members ranked in the top 22 in total defense this season, with the Alabama Crimson Tide and LSU Tigers ranking No. 1 and No. 2, respectively.
At the same time, the league has six teams ranked in the bottom 25 in total offense, with the Tennessee Volunteers (96th), Auburn Tigers (97th), Florida Gators (98th), Vanderbilt Commodores (99th), Ole Miss Rebels (113th) and Kentucky Wildcats (118th) sharing offensive resumes with the likes of Tulane, UAB and Buffalo.
To give you a better idea of just how bad the offensive competition is for some of the SEC's heavyweights, here's one stat of note: Of the teams on Alabama's schedule this season, only one (Arkansas) ranks in the top 75 in total offense.
The point is, Alabama is phenomenal on defense and LSU is really good, but when the Crimson Tide play Kent State, North Texas, Georgia Southern and the 88th-ranked offense in Penn State out of conference, their defensive numbers get further bloated. All the while you still have six SEC teams ranking among the 25 worst offenses in the FBS, even though UAB, CMU, FAU, MTSU and the rest of the alphabet universities fill up a third of many SEC teams' schedules.
I can continue to throw out statistics that point to the lack of offensive playmakers in the conference, like the fact that only two running backs rank in the top 30 nationally or just two wide receivers rank in the top 50. But the real issue is this: Good offensive teams have a very clear identity of who they are and what they want to do. Take a look at the Oregon Ducks, Houston Cougars, Oklahoma State Cowboys, Stanford Cardinal, Baylor Bears, Clemson Tigers, Wisconsin Badgers, et al. These teams simply don't deviate from their plans of attack.
In the SEC in 2011, who can make that case offensively? Arkansas with Bobby Petrino, Georgia with Aaron Murray and maybe Alabama with Trent Richardson, but outside of those three, none can answer the question, "What's your offensive identity?"
Consider this: All nine of those remaining teams have played multiple quarterbacks. Yes, nine of the 12 teams in the conference have used multiple players at the most critical position in sports, leading in large part to a lack of continuity, rhythm and development of offensive systems. It's no surprise that outside of Murray (one of my five young QBs on the rise), there are no SEC quarterbacks rated in the top 20 in passing efficiency. In fact, only Jarrett Lee (22), AJ McCarron (34) and Tyler Wilson (29) join Murray (12) in the top 50 in passing efficiency.
Support for my theory can be found in the few cases where SEC teams have played challenging out-of-conference opponents this season. LSU finished plus-7 in the turnover column against Oregon and West Virginia, which is a good thing because the Tigers allowed 335 and 533 yards to those teams, respectively (LSU allows only 219 per game against SEC opponents). We all know how Boise State's game with Georgia turned out, as the Broncos put up 35 points and 390 yards against a Georgia defense that is now fourth-best in the nation and allowing an average of 18 points and 273 yards per game. And not that Arkansas is considered to be among the SEC's best defenses, but the Razorbacks allowed 633 yards in their win against the Texas A&M Aggies.
Remember, it's not as though the SEC has historically lacked elite offenses. Just look at some of the QBs the league has produced over the past several years: Cam Newton, Ryan Mallett, Tim Tebow, Matthew Stafford, Peyton Manning. All those quarterbacks faced dominant and talented SEC defenses but ultimately achieved personal and team success because the perfect pass beats perfect coverage time and again.
That's why I have little doubt that if Matt Barkley were a Gamecock, Andrew Luck an LSU Tiger, Brandon Weeden a Razorback and Robert Griffin III an Auburn Tiger, you would be seeing very different defensive metrics in the SEC. For that matter, you would also see very different offensive production, too.
Over the next two weeks this theory will likely be put to the test. Georgia will take on a top-20 offense in Georgia Tech. The seventh-ranked South Carolina defense will tussle with a Clemson team that is putting up over 478 yards a game, and LSU will have one final test against the highest-ranked offense in the SEC, Arkansas and its 455 yards per game (you might be able to add an SEC title matchup against Georgia to LSU's list, as well). My hunch is that those offenses will pile on substantially more production than so many of the struggling offensive units in the SEC have all season long.
Not that it will be easy. This is a league full of great defenses, after all. But it's important to remember that as the BCS title debate unfolds over the one-loss teams these next few weeks, there's another side of the "strength of competition" issue to consider.
Brock Huard is a college football analyst for ESPN and ABC's Saturday games on the West Coast and works as a studio analyst for the networks. He played quarterback for six seasons in the NFL and was a three-year starter for the Washington Huskies. Huard is the co-host of the "Brock and Salk Show" on 710 ESPN Seattle (follow the show on Twitter here), and he will be writing a weekly column for ESPN Insider during the college football season.
Hmmm... I think some people here understand this.
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7241966/the-sec-loaded-great-defenses-ignore-weak-offenses-cfb
The SEC's offense problem
The league's defenses are the nation's best. But on the other side of the ball ...
By Brock Huard
ESPN Insider
Last week, many of you took exception to my argument that an undefeated Boise State Broncos team was deserving of a shot at the BCS title game and capable of beating the SEC's elite teams on a neutral field. The Broncos then went out and lost to the TCU Horned Frogs, done in by TCU's pass offense and yet another critical missed field goal, ending the debate over whether Boise should get a national championship opportunity this season.
But one aspect of my argument that remains unchanged even after the Broncos' loss is that the extent of the SEC's dominance this season has been inflated. At the center of this issue is the fact that even though there's no questioning the quality of the conference's defenses, the SEC is a league full of very weak offenses.
Before I discuss the offenses, though, let's give credit where credit is due. Objectively speaking, the SEC is without question the best defensive conference in college football and has been for many years. The players, especially those on the defensive front, are collectively head and shoulders above those of any other conference in America. More defenders from the SEC play on Sundays than from any other conference, and the adage "offenses win games, defenses win championships" has certainly held true down South, with the conference boasting the last five national champions.
But especially when looking at the quality of SEC teams this season, it seems only fair to apply the one factor that comes up in nearly every college football debate this time of year: strength of competition.
Part of this has the feel of a "chicken and the egg" debate, as great defenses can make offenses look bad just as easily as bad offenses can make defenses look great. But consider the numbers: The SEC has six of its 12 members ranked in the top 22 in total defense this season, with the Alabama Crimson Tide and LSU Tigers ranking No. 1 and No. 2, respectively.
At the same time, the league has six teams ranked in the bottom 25 in total offense, with the Tennessee Volunteers (96th), Auburn Tigers (97th), Florida Gators (98th), Vanderbilt Commodores (99th), Ole Miss Rebels (113th) and Kentucky Wildcats (118th) sharing offensive resumes with the likes of Tulane, UAB and Buffalo.
To give you a better idea of just how bad the offensive competition is for some of the SEC's heavyweights, here's one stat of note: Of the teams on Alabama's schedule this season, only one (Arkansas) ranks in the top 75 in total offense.
The point is, Alabama is phenomenal on defense and LSU is really good, but when the Crimson Tide play Kent State, North Texas, Georgia Southern and the 88th-ranked offense in Penn State out of conference, their defensive numbers get further bloated. All the while you still have six SEC teams ranking among the 25 worst offenses in the FBS, even though UAB, CMU, FAU, MTSU and the rest of the alphabet universities fill up a third of many SEC teams' schedules.
I can continue to throw out statistics that point to the lack of offensive playmakers in the conference, like the fact that only two running backs rank in the top 30 nationally or just two wide receivers rank in the top 50. But the real issue is this: Good offensive teams have a very clear identity of who they are and what they want to do. Take a look at the Oregon Ducks, Houston Cougars, Oklahoma State Cowboys, Stanford Cardinal, Baylor Bears, Clemson Tigers, Wisconsin Badgers, et al. These teams simply don't deviate from their plans of attack.
In the SEC in 2011, who can make that case offensively? Arkansas with Bobby Petrino, Georgia with Aaron Murray and maybe Alabama with Trent Richardson, but outside of those three, none can answer the question, "What's your offensive identity?"
Consider this: All nine of those remaining teams have played multiple quarterbacks. Yes, nine of the 12 teams in the conference have used multiple players at the most critical position in sports, leading in large part to a lack of continuity, rhythm and development of offensive systems. It's no surprise that outside of Murray (one of my five young QBs on the rise), there are no SEC quarterbacks rated in the top 20 in passing efficiency. In fact, only Jarrett Lee (22), AJ McCarron (34) and Tyler Wilson (29) join Murray (12) in the top 50 in passing efficiency.
Support for my theory can be found in the few cases where SEC teams have played challenging out-of-conference opponents this season. LSU finished plus-7 in the turnover column against Oregon and West Virginia, which is a good thing because the Tigers allowed 335 and 533 yards to those teams, respectively (LSU allows only 219 per game against SEC opponents). We all know how Boise State's game with Georgia turned out, as the Broncos put up 35 points and 390 yards against a Georgia defense that is now fourth-best in the nation and allowing an average of 18 points and 273 yards per game. And not that Arkansas is considered to be among the SEC's best defenses, but the Razorbacks allowed 633 yards in their win against the Texas A&M Aggies.
Remember, it's not as though the SEC has historically lacked elite offenses. Just look at some of the QBs the league has produced over the past several years: Cam Newton, Ryan Mallett, Tim Tebow, Matthew Stafford, Peyton Manning. All those quarterbacks faced dominant and talented SEC defenses but ultimately achieved personal and team success because the perfect pass beats perfect coverage time and again.
That's why I have little doubt that if Matt Barkley were a Gamecock, Andrew Luck an LSU Tiger, Brandon Weeden a Razorback and Robert Griffin III an Auburn Tiger, you would be seeing very different defensive metrics in the SEC. For that matter, you would also see very different offensive production, too.
Over the next two weeks this theory will likely be put to the test. Georgia will take on a top-20 offense in Georgia Tech. The seventh-ranked South Carolina defense will tussle with a Clemson team that is putting up over 478 yards a game, and LSU will have one final test against the highest-ranked offense in the SEC, Arkansas and its 455 yards per game (you might be able to add an SEC title matchup against Georgia to LSU's list, as well). My hunch is that those offenses will pile on substantially more production than so many of the struggling offensive units in the SEC have all season long.
Not that it will be easy. This is a league full of great defenses, after all. But it's important to remember that as the BCS title debate unfolds over the one-loss teams these next few weeks, there's another side of the "strength of competition" issue to consider.
Brock Huard is a college football analyst for ESPN and ABC's Saturday games on the West Coast and works as a studio analyst for the networks. He played quarterback for six seasons in the NFL and was a three-year starter for the Washington Huskies. Huard is the co-host of the "Brock and Salk Show" on 710 ESPN Seattle (follow the show on Twitter here), and he will be writing a weekly column for ESPN Insider during the college football season.
Hmmm... I think some people here understand this.