Lott's Bandana
10/30/2011, 12:02 PM
Sat 09/03/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000052220110903.xml)
TULSA * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=719&year=2011&week=9)
47 - 14
W
Sat 09/17/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000023420110917.xml)
@ Florida St. * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=234&year=2011&week=9)
23 - 13
W
Sat 09/24/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000052220110924.xml)
MISSOURI * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=434&year=2011&week=9)
38 - 28
W
Sat 10/01/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000052220111001.xml)
BALL ST. * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=47&year=2011&week=9)
62 - 6
W
Sat 10/08/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000070320111008.xml)
@ Texas ^ (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
55 - 17
W
Sat 10/15/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000032820111015.xml)
@ Kansas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=328&year=2011&week=9)
47 - 17
W
Sat 10/22/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000052220111022.xml)
TEXAS TECH (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=700&year=2011&week=9)
38 - 41
L
Sat 10/29/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000032720111029.xml)
@ Kansas St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=327&year=2011&week=9)
58 - 17
W
Sat 11/05/2011
TEXAS A&M (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=697&year=2011&week=9)
Sat 11/19/2011
@ Baylor (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=51&year=2011&week=9)
Sat 11/26/2011
IOWA ST. * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=311&year=2011&week=9)
Sat 12/03/2011
@ Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
HOME GAME IN CAPS
* Night Game
^ Neutral Site
OT Overtime Game
Rushing Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamrush&site=org)
51
167.00
Army (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=725&year=2011&week=9)
369.00
8
Missouri (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=434&year=2011&week=9)
243.88
Passing Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampass&site=org)
2
396.63
Houston (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=288&year=2011&week=9)
453.25
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
396.63
Total Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamtotoff&site=org)
2
563.63
Houston (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=288&year=2011&week=9)
612.38
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
563.63
Scoring Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamscoroff&site=org)
5
46.00
Houston (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=288&year=2011&week=9)
52.25
2
Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
49.88
Rushing Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamrushdef&site=org)
34
124.75
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
44.88
4
Kansas St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=327&year=2011&week=9)
103.25
Pass Efficiency Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamdefpasseff&site=org)
18
112.42
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
83.63
2
Texas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
100.70
Total Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamtotdef&site=org)
34
339.38
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
180.50
2
Texas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
296.43
Scoring Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamscordef&site=org)
20
19.13
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
6.88
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
19.13
Net Punting (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamnetpunt&site=org)
29
38.25
Oregon (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=529&year=2011&week=9)
45.14
2
Missouri (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=434&year=2011&week=9)
39.60
Punt Returns (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampuntret&site=org)
32
10.53
Ole Miss (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=433&year=2011&week=9)
27.75
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
10.53
Kickoff Returns (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamkickret&site=org)
95
19.88
Temple (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=690&year=2011&week=9)
28.83
10
Kansas St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=327&year=2011&week=9)
27.32
Turnover Margin (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamturnovermrgn&site=org)
51
.13
Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
2.38
5
Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
2.38
Pass Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampassdef&site=org)
53
214.63
Michigan St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=416&year=2011&week=9)
127.25
3
Texas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
192.29
Passing Efficiency (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampasseff&site=org)
16
155.63
Baylor (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=51&year=2011&week=9)
192.36
3
Baylor (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=51&year=2011&week=9)
192.36
Sacks (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamsacks&site=org)
1
4.25
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
4.25
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
4.25
Tackles For Loss (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamtacklesloss&site=org)
4
8.25
South Fla. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=651&year=2011&week=9)
8.71
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
8.25
Sacks Allowed (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamsacksallowed&site=org)
1
.38
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
.38
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
.38
..
.................................................. .................................................. ...............................National Rank^ ................. Conference Rank^
TULSA * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=719&year=2011&week=9)
47 - 14
W
Sat 09/17/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000023420110917.xml)
@ Florida St. * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=234&year=2011&week=9)
23 - 13
W
Sat 09/24/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000052220110924.xml)
MISSOURI * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=434&year=2011&week=9)
38 - 28
W
Sat 10/01/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000052220111001.xml)
BALL ST. * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=47&year=2011&week=9)
62 - 6
W
Sat 10/08/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000070320111008.xml)
@ Texas ^ (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
55 - 17
W
Sat 10/15/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000032820111015.xml)
@ Kansas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=328&year=2011&week=9)
47 - 17
W
Sat 10/22/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000052220111022.xml)
TEXAS TECH (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=700&year=2011&week=9)
38 - 41
L
Sat 10/29/2011 (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/worksheet.jsp?year=2011&game=201100000032720111029.xml)
@ Kansas St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=327&year=2011&week=9)
58 - 17
W
Sat 11/05/2011
TEXAS A&M (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=697&year=2011&week=9)
Sat 11/19/2011
@ Baylor (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=51&year=2011&week=9)
Sat 11/26/2011
IOWA ST. * (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=311&year=2011&week=9)
Sat 12/03/2011
@ Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
HOME GAME IN CAPS
* Night Game
^ Neutral Site
OT Overtime Game
Rushing Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamrush&site=org)
51
167.00
Army (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=725&year=2011&week=9)
369.00
8
Missouri (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=434&year=2011&week=9)
243.88
Passing Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampass&site=org)
2
396.63
Houston (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=288&year=2011&week=9)
453.25
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
396.63
Total Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamtotoff&site=org)
2
563.63
Houston (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=288&year=2011&week=9)
612.38
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
563.63
Scoring Offense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamscoroff&site=org)
5
46.00
Houston (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=288&year=2011&week=9)
52.25
2
Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
49.88
Rushing Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamrushdef&site=org)
34
124.75
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
44.88
4
Kansas St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=327&year=2011&week=9)
103.25
Pass Efficiency Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamdefpasseff&site=org)
18
112.42
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
83.63
2
Texas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
100.70
Total Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamtotdef&site=org)
34
339.38
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
180.50
2
Texas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
296.43
Scoring Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamscordef&site=org)
20
19.13
Alabama (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=8&year=2011&week=9)
6.88
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
19.13
Net Punting (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamnetpunt&site=org)
29
38.25
Oregon (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=529&year=2011&week=9)
45.14
2
Missouri (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=434&year=2011&week=9)
39.60
Punt Returns (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampuntret&site=org)
32
10.53
Ole Miss (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=433&year=2011&week=9)
27.75
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
10.53
Kickoff Returns (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamkickret&site=org)
95
19.88
Temple (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=690&year=2011&week=9)
28.83
10
Kansas St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=327&year=2011&week=9)
27.32
Turnover Margin (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamturnovermrgn&site=org)
51
.13
Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
2.38
5
Oklahoma St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=521&year=2011&week=9)
2.38
Pass Defense (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampassdef&site=org)
53
214.63
Michigan St. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=416&year=2011&week=9)
127.25
3
Texas (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=703&year=2011&week=9)
192.29
Passing Efficiency (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teampasseff&site=org)
16
155.63
Baylor (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=51&year=2011&week=9)
192.36
3
Baylor (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=51&year=2011&week=9)
192.36
Sacks (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamsacks&site=org)
1
4.25
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
4.25
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
4.25
Tackles For Loss (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamtacklesloss&site=org)
4
8.25
South Fla. (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=651&year=2011&week=9)
8.71
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
8.25
Sacks Allowed (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2011&div=B&rpt=IA_teamsacksallowed&site=org)
1
.38
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
.38
1
Oklahoma (http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=522&year=2011&week=9)
.38
..
.................................................. .................................................. ...............................National Rank^ ................. Conference Rank^