Dear Mr. Hannity....

[Curly Bill]

Oh my , you just keep wounding me with that Mt. Dew ****.:rolleyes:

WTF does that even mean?

[SpankyNek]

I dont recall much about their presidential endorsements, but the HC was beating Bill White's drum and were instrumental with the election of the very liberal Houston Mayor, Anise Parker. The HC is a liberal leaning media outlet by any definition, regardless of whatever opinionated internet list a google search might turn up.

I think that there are some folks there that really took hold of the Tommy Thompson deal and used it to further other political agendas. Really, outside of the Op-eds (Which they balance nicely, IMO) the paper is mostly powerless (In general) these days.

[olevetonahill]

WTF does that even mean?

You the one pointin out his gheyness, I figure hes just using some kinda ghey talk code fer wanting to sip my nectar er sompun.:eek:

[Curly Bill]

Curley Bill, you are on an absolute roll today.


We've had a few libs in the past that proved a tough argument. That while I thought they were wrong in their beliefs, they had enough intelligence to stand up for what they believed, argue it in an intelligent fashion, and make you be on your game to stand there with them. These few dumases in this thread today make it easy. Hell, you can just mock them they're so bad.

[tcrb]

I think that there are some folks there that really took hold of the Tommy Thompson deal and used it to further other political agendas. Really, outside of the Op-eds (Which they balance nicely, IMO) the paper is mostly powerless (In general) these days.

I would agree with this statement. Television has a much bigger audience and is a much better medium for effecting the opinion of the herds of sheep out there that believe everything they are told. (Yeah, I'm looking at certain posters in this thread).:rolleyes:

[Curly Bill]

You the one pointin out his gheyness, I figure hes just using some kinda ghey talk code fer wanting to sip my nectar er sompun.:eek:

Maybe so. I'm pretty sure he's gay as gay can be, but I sure don't know the code. :D

[olevetonahill]

Maybe so. I'm pretty sure he's gay as gay can be, but I sure don't know the code. :D

Me either, But he keeps referring to me as Mt. Dew and talkin about My Danny.:pop:

[Curly Bill]

But I bet your favorite kind of fights are those when you and your boys dress up in panties and have tickle fights. :D

The Profit gave me positive spek for this post. I guess that means I was right. :D

[SpankyNek]

We've had a few libs in the past that proved a tough argument. That while I thought they were wrong in their beliefs, they had enough intelligence to stand up for what they believed, argue it in an intelligent fashion, and make you be on your game to stand there with them. These few dumases in this thread today make it easy. Hell, you can just mock them they're so bad.
Perhaps you mock "libs" because you can not offer a defensible refuting position.

I have given countless exhibits, attempted to engage in dialogue, and am repeatedly met by your unfounded attacks on my intelligence. It is you, sir, that lacks any effective information in this thread (You have plainly stated such on at least two occasions in this thread alone), your continued "Laugh at the silly monkey" act has us feeling pity for the dopey man at the zoo, inexorably fixated upon the masturbating orangutans.

[Curly Bill]

Perhaps you mock "libs" because you can not offer a defensible refuting position.

I have given countless exhibits, attempted to engage in dialogue, and am repeatedly met by your unfounded attacks on my intelligence. It is you, sir, that lacks any effective information in this thread (You have plainly stated such on at least two occasions in this thread alone), your continued "Laugh at the silly monkey" act has us feeling pity for the dopey man at the zoo, inexorably fixated upon the masturbating orangutans.

LOL...I wish I could actually hear you say: "It is you sir" in your best uppity voice. That would make me laugh. :D

[SpankyNek]

LOL...I wish I could actually hear you say: "It is you sir" in your best uppity voice. That would make me laugh. :D

Ahhh...more substance from Curly.

You sure have a pretty low threshold for comedic enjoyment.

[Curly Bill]

Perhaps you mock "libs" because you can not offer a defensible refuting position.

I have given countless exhibits, attempted to engage in dialogue, and am repeatedly met by your unfounded attacks on my intelligence. It is you, sir, that lacks any effective information in this thread (You have plainly stated such on at least two occasions in this thread alone), your continued "Laugh at the silly monkey" act has us feeling pity for the dopey man at the zoo, inexorably fixated upon the masturbating orangutans.


...and I mock libs because it proves to be easy. If I wanted to work at something I wouldn't be on here to do it. This is a message board, so I'll treat it as such. You want to act like you're defending your PHD knock yourself out. I think the act is pretty cute - good job. ;)

[OU_Sooners75]

Here is my complete quotation, along with the contextual subject for which I gave reply:



This makes the picture rather clear. One person claims that "Obamacare" is socialist (Miles from the proper usage of the term, as it is nothing more that a capitalist mandate to spend currency) and that Socialism is indicative of bigger government. Neither of these statements is based in fact at all.

Then you comment that our President is Socialist because he wants to re-distribute wealth (Never mind that any statements or actions used in an attempt to do so were done without using socialist principle), making it your cornerstone benchmark as a litmus test for Socialism. There has been no serious advocation given by anyone in our federal government of taking ALL money and giving it (Equally) to ALL people.

If you can find a single example in any of your hard-bound books that would equate "Obamacare" and any other state controlled means of wealth distribution via taxation as Socialism, feel free to cite it..any format is fine.

So I take it you think Obamacare is not a social program?

Let me ask you this:

When Chavez of Venezuela decided to make the Venezuelan oil industry a government ran industry, was that or was that not, considered socialist?

When he decided to take away their central bank and make it a government ran institution, was that not considered a socialist move?

When he decided to take over American ran oil companies in Venezuela was that not considered a socialist move?


Yes, it was, it even concerned the UN.

So, with that said, when Obama wants to make healthcare a government ran institution, it is very much soicialist.

Next?

[OU_Sooners75]

You are correct, sir.

I knew that my statement might have been a bit precarious right after I wrote it.


A little research using google or any search engine will get you the desired results before opening your mouth for your foot!

[olevetonahill]

Perhaps you mock "libs" because you can not offer a defensible refuting position.

I have given countless exhibits, attempted to engage in dialogue, and am repeatedly met by your unfounded attacks on my intelligence. It is you, sir, that lacks any effective information in this thread (You have plainly stated such on at least two occasions in this thread alone), your continued "Laugh at the silly monkey" act has us feeling pity for the dopey man at the zoo, inexorably fixated upon the masturbating orangutans.

So your saying Yall are masturbating monkeys?:eek:

[SpankyNek]

So your saying Yall are masturbating monkeys?:eek:

Don't tell me you never flogged the bishop.

[OU_Sooners75]

Don't tell me you never flogged the bishop.

Im not a Catholic, nor was I a Choir Boy.

But yes, I can wash it as long as I want too, afterall, it is mine! :O

[The Profit]

Me either, But he keeps referring to me as Mt. Dew and talkin about My Danny.:pop:



Danny, Timmy, whatever....State wildlife really didn't give a shiz what his name was. They were just happy to have 'em. Whatever his name is, he is enjoying life at Martin Nature Park. You can come and see him for $4.50.

[OU_Sooners75]

Danny, Timmy, whatever....State wildlife really didn't give a shiz what his name was. They were just happy to have 'em. Whatever his name is, he is enjoying life at Martin Nature Park. You can come and see him for $4.50.

:gary:

[olevetonahill]

Danny, Timmy, whatever....State wildlife really didn't give a shiz what his name was. They were just happy to have 'em. Whatever his name is, he is enjoying life at Martin Nature Park. You can come and see him for $4.50.

Well now aint that mighty nice of you, to keep bringin this up.:rolleyes:

[The Profit]

Well now aint that mighty nice of you, to keep bringin this up.:rolleyes:




Just kiddin ya, Mt. Dew.

[OU_Sooners75]

Just kiddin ya, Mt. Dew.


:confused:

Im curious, why are you calling Vet, Mt. Dew, like you are some 5th grader or something?

[olevetonahill]

Don't tell me you never flogged the bishop.

Dont guess I have , Ya see i dont use cute little ghey assed terms for it
I just jack off and be done with it.;)

[Curly Bill]

:confused:

Im curious, why are you calling Vet, Mt. Dew, like you are some 5th grader or something?

We worked this out earlier - he's a sophomore.

Oh wait...we said sophomoric. :D

[The Profit]

The Profit gave me positive spek for this post. I guess that means I was right. :D



Keep it up and I will share all of the spek from you where you are offering to suck my ....

[olevetonahill]

Just kiddin ya, Mt. Dew.

Well now, Aint you just a http://www.prideofmanchester.com/comedy/photos/bol120.jpg

[OU_Sooners75]

Keep it up and I will share all of the spek from you where you are offering to suck my ....


I guess Bill is correct, you are very sophomoric.

Or is is sophmoronic?

[Curly Bill]

Keep it up and I will share all of the spek from you where you are offering to suck my ....

Go ahead, if I'd actually done that I wouldn't be ashamed, but since I didn't I don't know where that leaves ya. :D

[SpankyNek]

So I take it you think Obamacare is not a social program?

Let me ask you this:

When Chavez of Venezuela decided to make the Venezuelan oil industry a government ran industry, was that or was that not, considered socialist?

When he decided to take away their central bank and make it a government ran institution, was that not considered a socialist move?

When he decided to take over American ran oil companies in Venezuela was that not considered a socialist move?


Yes, it was, it even concerned the UN.

So, with that said, when Obama wants to make healthcare a government ran institution, it is very much soicialist.

Next?
Nationalizing resources is more akin to communism, but for the sake of discussion, we shall lump them together.

Obama's healthcare plan merely requires people to buy private insurance. This is in no way akin to taking over Venezuela's oil. To make the arguments congruous, Obama would have to take over every company that provides healthcare, and then give the services away.

Or, to use the oil reference, it would be akin to Chavez simply telling every Venezuelan "You have to use at least 300 gallons of gas this year, or you will be fined."

Do you see the difference?

[The Profit]

Well now, Aint you just a http://www.prideofmanchester.com/comedy/photos/bol120.jpg




I was only kidding about the $4.50.

[olevetonahill]

Keep it up and I will share all of the times I've offered to suck your dick....

:eek: :pop:

[OU_Sooners75]

Nationalizing resources is more akin to communism, but for the sake of discussion, we shall lump them together.

Obama's healthcare plan merely requires people to buy private insurance. This is in no way akin to taking over Venezuela's oil. To make the arguments congruous, Obama would have to take over every company that provides healthcare, and then give the services away.

Or, to use the oil reference, it would be akin to Chavez simply telling every Venezuelan "You have to use at least 300 gallons of gas this year, or you will be fined."

Do you see the difference?

They are goverment ran programs...all of them, making them socialist programs because it takes it out of the private sector and gives it to all citizens. And Obamacare is more than just telling people they have to have private insurance.

And yes, the United States already has plenty of socialist programs from Social Security to Medicare/Medicaid. I guess the US is also on the verge of being Communist...since the US government owns some Airlines and Automobile companies.

If you think what Chavez did was Communist, then you are sadly mistaken...because apparently everyone but you thinks that what he has done was a socialist movement in Venezuela....in fact he belongs to the Socialist Party of Venezuela.

[SpankyNek]

They are goverment ran programs...all of them, making them socialist programs because it takes it out of the private sector and gives it to all citizens. And Obamacare is more than just telling people they have to have private insurance.

And yes, the United States already has plenty of socialist programs from Social Security to Medicare/Medicaid. I guess the US is also on the verge of being Communist...since the US government owns some Airlines and Automobile companies.

If you think what Chavez did was Communist, then you are sadly mistaken...because apparently everyone but you thinks that what he has done was a socialist movement in Venezuela....in fact he belongs to the Socialist Party of Venezuela.

The lines get blurred all of the time, don't blame me. Tell me the difference between Venezuela's nationalized oil and China's nationalized coal.

Now please tell me of any facet of "Obamacare" that deals with taking healthcare away from the private sector and giving it to all citizens.

I will agree that Social Security and Welfare are supposed to be socialist programs, but neither take in funds from EVERY person and distribute them equally among them.

SS comes close, but they began to use overages to pay other things instead of putting them back out to the proletariat.

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

Are any experienced presidents eligible to run the country into the ground?

Oh, I guess one is.Good post!

[tcrb]

Call it whatever you want....socialism....communism...obamaism. It is a slippery slope our nation has stepped on. And the liberal lemmings fail to recognize the baby steps that are currently being taken towards this new "progressive government". First bail out the financial sector, then a major portion of the manufacturing sector, cripple the energy industry and overburden it with cap & trade, place controls on health insurance....Increase government jobs and government entitlements..... If you cant see a pattern developing, you're just blind or ignorant.

[The Profit]

Call it whatever you want....socialism....communism...obamaism. It is a slippery slope our nation has stepped on. And the liberal lemmings fail to recognize the baby steps that are currently being taken towards this new "progressive government". First bail out the financial sector, then a major portion of the manufacturing sector, cripple the energy industry and overburden it with cap & trade, place controls on health insurance....Increase government jobs and government entitlements..... If you cant see a pattern developing, you're just blind or ignorant.



Did you forget that it was the Bush administration that bailed out the financial sector? Are you blind to the fact that saving the US auto industry was an overwhelming success, and the loans are being paid back ahead of time? There has been no cap and trade. The number of government jobs has decreaed. What are you talking about?

[StoopTroup]

Call it whatever you want....socialism....communism...obamaism. It is a slippery slope our nation has stepped on. And the liberal lemmings fail to recognize the baby steps that are currently being taken towards this new "progressive government". First bail out the financial sector, then a major portion of the manufacturing sector, cripple the energy industry and overburden it with cap & trade, place controls on health insurance....Increase government jobs and government entitlements..... If you cant see a pattern developing, you're just blind or ignorant.

Continuum Fallacy is what you are experiencing in regards to all of the good things that have occurred once FOX and others went and **** themselves sideways when the Obama Administration made moves to try and make sure that if they did use the Taxpayers money....it would get paid back and at least look like tons of it didn't just go into the briefcases of the thieves we all know they are. He was screwed either way and this way he really put them all in the limelight instead of allowing them to blame him for doing nothing. It was one of the best political moves he's made. I hate that politics is in the way of fixing all of this but the Tea party has put the Republicans in such a spot since the 2008 elections that they have little choice but to play along and the Tea party is really going to probably use Palin and push to make the run against Obama. I don't think it will work as i think he will crush her worse than he did McCain and then the Tea party and the RNC will suffer for it especially if our Country goes into the crapper financially because they are pissed they couldn't beat him. I think he's playing them all like chumps right now.

Congress is just protecting themselves and the GOP Govs. and Senators are all scared to play their hand as they have way to many folks at the table. The RNC should try to convince more of their real players to try and limit it to 3 and really address the issues and show that the rest of their party isn't split. I think it's way to late now to do it though.

[tcrb]

Did you forget that it was the Bush administration that bailed out the financial sector?

Typical lib response....blame Bush. No, I didn't forget who started the bailout of Wall Street. I'm not defending Bush. Congress also was/is a major player in all bailouts and there are plenty of politicians on both sides that have profited from the bailouts to assure the continued financial support that keeps them in office. But there's no denying that the bailout of the financial sector that started under Bush has been continued and grown under Obama.

Are you blind to the fact that saving the US auto industry was an overwhelming success, and the loans are being paid back ahead of time?

Success for who? The unions, and the Dems? You bet it was, but the big winner was obama, because now the unions are even more beholding to him. Let's be honest here...the unions helped elect him and he was just passing out another of his political paybacks. I have a problem with either party using my tax dollars to secure votes for re-election. Ford managed to weather the storm on their own, without gov't help, and Chrysler and GM should have been left to work it out on their own as well. That's how capitalism is supposed to work. The strong and intelligent survive and the weak are weeded out. I dont believe it's government's job to use my tax dollars to bail out every industry that gets itself into a financial pickle.

There has been no cap and trade.

There has been no c&t yet. But you can rest assured that if it were not for the repubs gaining control of the House last year, c&t would have been shoved up our asses the same way obamacare was. And if Barry is re-elected and has half a chance to pass it, he will do his best. In the meantime, he just placed a moratorium on U.S. companies drilling in the Gulf and gave the nod to Brazil. It had a similar effect on our energy industry as c&t would have.....if you haven't noticed, gas prices have pretty much doubled since the president's executive order went into effect and there's been somewhere in the neighborhood of 300,000 jobs lost in the oil and gas industry.

The number of government jobs has decreaed.

This is a true statement if you are talking about local gov't jobs. They have certainly decreased since obama took office. However, federal gov't jobs have increased....that's a fact. And once obama care kicks in, you'll see a hiring surge in the Federal sector like we've never seen before. Do a little research if you dont believe it.



What are you talking about?

You and your fellow lemmings are what I'm talking about. Take a moment and step outside the herd long enough to clear your head of the obama mania and you will see that the promise of hope and change that you swallowed hook line and sinker is nothing more than a cliff that this country is headed for at full speed.

[OU_Sooners75]

I will agree that Social Security and Welfare are supposed to be socialist programs, but neither take in funds from EVERY person and distribute them equally among them.



Really? I guess you are correct, but the system is suppose to distribute to to all equally or at least what you paid into the system.

If rumor is true, when I get to the age of being able to use Social Security, what I have paid in wont be available. So if it wont be available to me, where did that money go to? It obviously would have been taken from me and given to someone else, since it wouldnt be available.

I also pay into medicare/medicaid. Yet that program seems to be going the way social security is as well. So same question, where is the monies I am paying in going if I wont be able to use them?

Yes, the welfare and social security systems are socialist programs.

[OU_Sooners75]

Did you forget that it was the Bush administration that bailed out the financial sector? Are you blind to the fact that saving the US auto industry was an overwhelming success, and the loans are being paid back ahead of time? There has been no cap and trade. The number of government jobs has decreaed. What are you talking about?


The number of government jobs have decreased? Got proof of this?

[RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!]

http://www.soonerfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155858