soonerboy_odanorth
10/28/2010, 12:25 AM
Vegas wants more of your money.
If you're an OU follower, one would think you've lost confidence in OU's ability to cover after falling apart against Mizzou. If you're a CU follower, you have to think after Mizzou no way is OU good enough to cover 24, even if CU is a pretty bad football team.
Either way, logically you take CU to cover.
Except Vegas wants more of your money. They don't want to have to pay out.
So, logically, Vegas is betting OU WILL cover.
Unless, of course, Vegas knows that you know that they are betting OU will cover, in which case, the safe bet is that CU will cover, which means the Vegas money is on CU to cover, which means they want you to bet that OU will cover.
So no way OU covers. Unless of course they do.
Got it?
If you're an OU follower, one would think you've lost confidence in OU's ability to cover after falling apart against Mizzou. If you're a CU follower, you have to think after Mizzou no way is OU good enough to cover 24, even if CU is a pretty bad football team.
Either way, logically you take CU to cover.
Except Vegas wants more of your money. They don't want to have to pay out.
So, logically, Vegas is betting OU WILL cover.
Unless, of course, Vegas knows that you know that they are betting OU will cover, in which case, the safe bet is that CU will cover, which means the Vegas money is on CU to cover, which means they want you to bet that OU will cover.
So no way OU covers. Unless of course they do.
Got it?