Why is channel 4 lying

[soonerbub]

They said 5.1 on their news but usgs has it at 4.3--stupid sensational bull****

[Tulsa_Fireman]

Thought I read wher the OGS was contradicting the USGS information and reported the 5.1.

That and Mike Morgan is a raving homowner.

[sooner59]

Let's wait and see what Kelly Ogle thinks. His word is truth....or so he thinks.

[Frozen Sooner]

Using the old Richter scale vs. the revised?

[sooner59]

Using the Mark Richt scale, it was only a 0.333. Oh wait, that's his winning percentage so far this year. :eek:

[soonerbub]

:gary: took care of it--they even did a story on it channel 4 just threw out the big number

kinda like their chopper shots of naders are always dark and ominous

[badger]

Yeah, whether it was 5.1 or 4.3 depended on which Geological Survey you believed - the U.S. one (4.3) or the Oklahoma one (5.1)

[stoopified]

Yeah, whether it was 5.1 or 4.3 depended on which Geological Survey you believed - the U.S. one (4.3) or the Oklahoma one (5.1)I trust the Oklahoma one,you know how them U.S. people lie. :)

[HBick]

Let's wait and see what Kelly Ogle thinks. His word is truth....or so he thinks.

Can't wait for My 2 Cents tonight, or is it The Rant? I don't know which Ogle is which, the only reliable one is the Lost Ogle

[GottaHavePride]

I read an article that the numbers are based on different methods of measuring the quake's magnitude.

This one was more just an earthjiggle, anyway.

[soonercruiser]

Yeah, whether it was 5.1 or 4.3 depended on which Geological Survey you believed - the U.S. one (4.3) or the Oklahoma one (5.1)

Things are always "shakin" more in Norman!

[Soonerus]

Yeah, whether it was 5.1 or 4.3 depended on which Geological Survey you believed - the U.S. one (4.3) or the Oklahoma one (5.1)

Bingo....