PDA

View Full Version : IGNORE THE 1ST AMENDMENT!!!



MR2-Sooner86
4/3/2010, 09:29 AM
Just this once...

Dead Marine's father ordered to pay protesters' legal costs (http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/30/westboro.baptist.snyder/index.html?hpt=T1)


The father of a Marine whose funeral was picketed by the Westboro Baptist Church says an order to pay the protesters' legal costs in a civil claim is nothing less than a "slap in the face."

"By the court making this decision, they're not only telling me that they're taking their side, but I have to pay them money to do this to more soldiers and their families," said Albert Snyder, whose son, Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder, was killed in action in Iraq in 2006.

Members of the fundamentalist church based in Topeka, Kansas, appeared outside Snyder's funeral in 2006 in Westminster, Maryland, carrying signs reading "You're going to hell," "God hates you" and "Thank God for dead soldiers."

Among the teachings of the church, which was founded in 1955 by pastor Fred Phelps, is the belief that God is punishing the United States for "the sin of homosexuality" through events such as soldiers' deaths.

Margie Phelps, the daughter of Fred Phelps and the attorney representing the church in its appeals, also said the money that the church receives from Snyder will be used to finance demonstrations. But she also said that the order was a consequence of his decision to sue the church over the demonstration.

"Mr. Snyder and his attorneys have engaged the legal system; there are some rules to that legal engagement," said Phelps, a member of Westboro who says she has participated in more than 150 protests of military funerals.
"They wanted to shut down the picketing so now they're going to finance it," she said.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday ordered that Snyder pay more than $16,000 in costs requested by Westboro for copies of motions, briefs and appendices, according to court documents.

In a motion filed in October, Snyder's lawyer, who is representing him for free, asked the court to dismiss the bill of costs, or, alternatively, reduce the 50-cent fee per page or charge Snyder only for copies that were necessary to make their arguments on appeal.

"We objected based upon ability to pay and the fairness of the situation," Sean Summers said.

The mostly pro-forma ruling is the latest chapter in an ongoing legal saga that pits privacy rights of grieving families against the free speech rights of demonstrators, however disturbing and provocative their message.

Snyder's family sued the church and went to trial in 2007 alleging privacy invasion, intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy. A jury awarded the family $2.9 million in compensatory damages plus $8 million in punitive damages, which were reduced to $5 million.

Westboro in 2008 appealed the case to the 4th District, which reversed the judgments a year later, siding with the church's claims that its First Amendment rights had been violated.

"The protest was confined to a public area under supervision and regulation of local law enforcement and did not disrupt the church service," the circuit court opinion said. "Although reasonable people may disagree about the appropriateness of the Phelps' protest, this conduct simply does not satisfy the heavy burden required for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress under Maryland law."

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case to address issues of laws designed to protect the "sanctity and dignity of memorial and funeral services" as well as the privacy of family and friends of the deceased.
The justices will be asked to address how far states and private entities such as cemeteries and churches can go to justify picket-free zones and the use of "floating buffers" to silence or restrict speech or movements of demonstrators exercising their constitutional rights in a funeral setting.
Both Phelps and Snyder's attorney said they were surprised that the 4th District chose to weigh in on the issue of legal costs when they could have waited until after the Supreme Court hearing.

Phelps believes the ruling bodes well for her side.
"It is a good harbinger of the fact that the Supreme Court will remind this nation that you don't have mob rule. The fact that so many people hate these words does not mean you can silence or penalize them. That's supposed to be the great liberty that we congratulate ourselves on protecting in this nation. We strut all around the world forcing people to give all the liberties we supposedly have," she said.

Phelps anticipated that a Supreme Court ruling in the church's favor would be unpopular, but she said Westboro's members viewed the potential outcome in Biblical terms.

"When the Supreme Court unanimously upholds the 4th Circuit, it's going to put this country in a rage, and we will be expelled," she said. "But whenever it was time for an epic event in the Bible, the thing that happened right before is the prophets were removed from the land, and that's what's going to happen to us. ... We're going to sprint to the end of this race."

Snyder claims he is unable to pay any legal costs in the case and is attempting to raise funds on his son's site, http://www.matthewsnyder.org/. He is equally optimistic that he will prevail before the Supreme Court.

"The American people keep my spirits lifted a lot and give me hope. I think most of the country is on my side on this issue," he said. "Too many people have died to protect our rights and freedoms to have them degraded and spit upon like this church does."

OU_Sooners75
4/3/2010, 09:38 AM
Well, they do have the right to assemble and to freedom of speech.

However, I think that congress should step in and make it unlawful for protesters to demonstrate within so many feet of funeral precession and from the burial grounds.

It still gives the protesters their right to assemble and freedom of speech while giving the funeral party the right to privacy.

Flagstaffsooner
4/3/2010, 10:48 AM
Time to use the 2nd and gun down these a-holes from Westboro Baptist Church .

Leroy Lizard
4/3/2010, 11:06 AM
In summary:

You cannot call a constable a "fascist pig" in public. Those are fighting words. http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=13718

But you can carry a sign that says "Thank God for dead soldiers" to the funeral attended by the soldier's parents.

JohnnyMack
4/3/2010, 11:23 AM
Didn't the Westboro protesters file for a permit and weren't they granted permission to do this?

Leroy Lizard
4/3/2010, 11:44 AM
Yeah, the lawsuit against the picketers was ill-advised.

I guess the question is, why were they given a permit given the following?


The Court noted that the right of free speech is not absolute at all times and under all circumstances. There are certain "well-defined and narrowly limited" classes of speech that can be proscribed and regulated without constitutional problem. These include the "lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or 'fighting words'." The Court defined fighting words as those words that "by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace." Fighting words are excluded, the Court reasoned, because any benefit derived from their utterance is outweighed by the social interest in order and morality. The Court determined that the statute was constitutional. Finding that the epithets uttered by Chaplinsky were likely to provoke the average person to retaliation and thereby cause a breach of the peace, the Court ruled that Mr. Chaplinsky's words were unprotectable fighting words.

What brought this on? Calling a constable a "fascist." The SC says that a state can prohibit such speech.

Veritas
4/3/2010, 12:15 PM
I've seen these protesters several times. I don't think I've ever seen a sign that was spelled correctly or a protester over the age of fourteen. Most people just point and laugh and move/drive on. They really are a sad-looking little group, about as harmless as a gnat.
Sure, for you who didn't lose the child or loved one whose passing is being mourned. Can you at least sympathize with those for whom these "protests" would be like salt in a raw open wound?

Would it be illegal to shoot paintballs at these jerkoffs?

Veritas
4/3/2010, 12:22 PM
Yeah, I can totally sympathize. I didn't mean it that way, I just meant they're no big deal.
Yeah, I agree. They're just a bunch of attention whore retards who expose the downside of free speech: that people are free to say some really heinous ****.

CrimsonandCreamForever
4/3/2010, 03:12 PM
Two things:

First, the Bill of Rights was intended to protect the people from the government. Picketing a private funeral has nothing to do with the government, and, in my opinion, if the people in charge of the funeral don't want protestors there, they shouldn't be there.

Secondly, if I make public statements about you, they have to be true, or it is definitely illegal. Does WBC have any undoubtable proof behind the statements: "You're going to hell" and "God hates you." ?

Leroy Lizard
4/3/2010, 03:36 PM
Those statements are speculative in nature and, therefore, cannot be proven or disproven unless you plan to have God show up in court.

Your first point is more interesting. Even if they have the right to free speech, does that mean they are protected from liability for any damages that occur on account of their speech? Not sure.

GottaHavePride
4/3/2010, 06:08 PM
Isn't this the same guy that Bill O'Reilly said he's going to pay his court costs? And didn't the Supreme Court just agree to review the decision?

tommieharris91
4/3/2010, 06:10 PM
This has been discussed. (http://www.soonerfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140895&highlight=snyder+phelps) A lot (http://www.soonerfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140379&highlight=snyder+phelps)

delhalew
4/4/2010, 10:08 AM
I've seen these protesters several times. I don't think I've ever seen a sign that was spelled correctly or a protester over the age of fourteen. Most people just point and laugh and move/drive on. They really are a sad-looking little group, about as harmless as a gnat.

Harmless? Not to a grieving family. That statement was a bit moronic KC.