Top 100 Signees and BCS Bowls

[Blues1]

***Correlation Between Top 100 Signees and BCS Bowls***

LINK
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/12/24/top-100/index.html

Team Signees (2006-09) and BCS Bowls (2006-09)

USC 42 ~~~3 -- BCS Bowls
Texas 28 ~~2
Florida 28 ~~3
Notre Dame 24 ~1
LSU 22 ~~2
Ohio State 20 ~~4
Georgia 20 ~~1
Alabama 18 ~~2
Florida State 18 ~~0
Oklahoma 17 ~~3 -- (17 Top 100 Recruits and 3 BCS Bowls)
Michigan 15 ~~1
Miami 15 ~~0

LINK
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/12/24/top-100/index.html#ixzz0cnYPlgnx

[DenverSooner751]

LOL @ FSU.

Even in a weak conference......

[delhalew]

I have always been amazed what we accomplish with "pretty good" recruits as far as national perception. We get ours, but we don't get the five stars(i know) that others get.

I other words, don't make fun of us fans that think putting on a Sooner jersey turns you into a baddass. It's not completely unfounded.

[Collier11]

***Correlation Between Top 100 Signees and BCS Bowls***


Oklahoma 17 ~~3 -- (17 Top 100 Recruits and 3 BCS Bowls)


Just goes to show how good of a coach and a developer of talent Stoops and his staff are

[Curly Bill]

Didn't we get Calhoun, Good, and Washington, all in the same class and all 5 stars?

[delhalew]

It happens, just not like it happens for USC, whorns, and FLA.

[SanJoaquinSooner]

He didn't calculate the coefficient of correlation. what is it?

[Leroy Lizard]

Just goes to show how good of a coach and a developer of talent Stoops and his staff are

And how overrated Petey was as coach.

[Collier11]

I can buy that but the better statement might be how overrated recruiting rankings are