PDA

View Full Version : 4th and a foot



Leroy Lizard
11/28/2009, 02:41 PM
Am I the only one that was totally surprised that they didn't go for it? A QB sneak and they still have the ball with a chance to score.

And why not try to draw the D offsides?

delhalew
11/28/2009, 02:43 PM
Duh for me...

mightysooner
11/28/2009, 02:44 PM
Am I the only one that noticed that the receiver stepped out of bounds and then came back in bounds to make that catch which isn't legal?

soonerinabilene
11/28/2009, 02:45 PM
the wind blew away gundys 4 signs that, when read threw a little orphan annie decoder ring, tells zac to do a qb sneak.

tulsaoilerfan
11/28/2009, 02:45 PM
No i saw it too; why wasn't that play reviewed?

Leroy Lizard
11/28/2009, 02:45 PM
The announcers caught it.

Leroy Lizard
11/28/2009, 02:46 PM
Can they review the play? I didn't think they could.

mightysooner
11/28/2009, 02:46 PM
No i saw it too; why wasn't that play reviewed?


Don't know. You can't do that and it was clear as day. Should've been a non-catch.

BoulderSooner79
11/28/2009, 02:48 PM
I suspect that play is not reviewable, not sure.

I was shocked osu didn't go for it with 6" to go. They didn't even try to draw us off sides - head scratcher.

King Crimson
11/28/2009, 02:51 PM
yeah, that was weird. they were still in their own territory...i guess that's the reason. still baffling. in addition to the illegal catch, they got a great spot.

soonerinabilene
11/28/2009, 02:53 PM
if you can challenge that a ball was tipped to negate a pass inyerference call, you should be able to challenge if a player stepped out before touching it.

mightysooner
11/28/2009, 02:53 PM
Not really baffling considering it's Poke strategy. They knew we'd be expecting them to go for it so they faked us out by not considering going for it. Strategery misdirection....

the_edge
11/28/2009, 04:24 PM
Our defense was in Gundy's head.

Judge Smails
11/28/2009, 04:25 PM
Are you all serious?? Look who was calling their plays. That's the answer.

Hot Rod
11/28/2009, 04:26 PM
Our defense was in Gundy's head.

That and some Soul-Glo

Okie35
11/28/2009, 04:28 PM
I suspect that play is not reviewable, not sure.

I was shocked osu didn't go for it with 6" to go. They didn't even try to draw us off sides - head scratcher.

It's not once it was ruled as a catch. You can't get it overturned in that situation only thing you could've challenged was the spot.

Okie35
11/28/2009, 04:29 PM
if you can challenge that a ball was tipped to negate a pass inyerference call, you should be able to challenge if a player stepped out before touching it.

Two different situations types from that to the refs calling it a complete catch.

westcoast_sooner
11/28/2009, 04:32 PM
I was wondering about that myself. Seemed like the obvious thing would be to go for it. His offense had been stifled most of the day. He needed a spark. If he makes it, he has a little momentum. If he punts, he might pin OU deep, but it shows no confidence in his OL. Was glad he punted, but expected him to at least try to draw OU offsides.

landrun
11/28/2009, 04:47 PM
I was just glad to see them to burn a timeout to decide to punt when they're 6" away from a first down.

Crucifax Autumn
11/28/2009, 04:49 PM
Me too

Leroy Lizard
11/28/2009, 04:52 PM
Can a penalty ever be called on account of a review?

OUmillenium
11/28/2009, 04:55 PM
Should have gone for it. And should have given the 2nd half to Weedn instead of Zac. Thanks Gumby, u r a man.

Crucifax Autumn
11/28/2009, 04:56 PM
He's a vagina with spiked pubes.

BoulderSooner79
11/28/2009, 04:58 PM
Gundy punted twice on 4th and short when I think he should have gone for it. When Broyles backtracked and gave up the 1st down, Stoops went for it w/o hesitation. I liked the call at that point in the game, even if we didn't make it.