PDA

View Full Version : Obama's Paster: "Land of the greed, home of the slave"



OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 12:48 PM
Nice to see Obama's former pastor and mentor out making hateful speeches again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxfumgUTm5I&feature=player_embedded

JohnnyMack
11/3/2009, 01:18 PM
Where corporate media sets up a binary lens through which we are taught to view the world, an us versus them world and a communist versus Christian world, after all we are a Christian country.

Heh. While I don't happen to agree with Wright's political leanings at least he gets it.

SoonerLaw09
11/3/2009, 01:43 PM
So the corporate media is pushing the idea that we are a Christian country????

Puh-leez.

Tulsa_Fireman
11/3/2009, 02:14 PM
AV415yit7Zg

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 04:08 PM
Heh. While I don't happen to agree with Wright's political leanings at least he gets it.Interesting that he seems dismayed we aren't a more marxist nation. No wonder our Dear Leader was such a faithful follower for so many years.

OKLA21FAN
11/3/2009, 04:10 PM
soooooooooooooo
its not "home of the SOONERS!!!!" ???? :pop:

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 04:28 PM
His "Paster?"

Methinks you've eaten too much paste, thereby making you a Paster as well.

StoopTroup
11/3/2009, 04:32 PM
Heh. While I don't happen to agree with Wright's political leanings at least he gets it.

That right Johnny...it's us Christians against him.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 04:32 PM
Heh, Paster.

JohnnyMack
11/3/2009, 04:56 PM
That right Johnny...it's us Christians against him.

I was really talking about the binary lens and dichotomous nature of our country. The us vs. them mentality that is so prevalent.

StoopTroup
11/3/2009, 04:57 PM
It's the binary lens and dichotomous nature of our Country that brought us those pics of Erin. Are you saying you didn't like those pics? :D

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 04:59 PM
JM loves him some personal attacks!

Kinda ironic...

JohnnyMack
11/3/2009, 05:01 PM
JM loves him some personal attacks!

Kinda ironic...

I figure as long as you're gonna post made up **** I can do the same thing.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 05:02 PM
I figure as long as you're gonna post made up **** I can do the same thing.Yeah, but mine isn't personally attacking anyone on this board.

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 05:04 PM
Yeah, but mine isn't personally attacking anyone on this board.

Hello, OklahomaTuba. Please see this thread:

http://www.soonerfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136590

Thank you very much.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 05:14 PM
So JM is starting threads about me, personally attacking me and has me in his sig now?

I think he has a problem or something.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 05:16 PM
Does this still apply??? Just curious...


Personal attacks on other posters, including name-calling, vulgar or not, are strictly prohibited and may result in suspension of posting privileges or banning from the board.

JohnnyMack
11/3/2009, 05:26 PM
Tuba, you're pulling wwwaaayyyy out in front in the mock indignation thread. Congrats.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 05:33 PM
Tuba, you're pulling wwwaaayyyy out in front in the mock indignation thread. Congrats.That's great and all, but I would please ask you to stop personally attacking me on this board and stop starting threads about me for once. Your obsession with me is getting weird.

JohnnyMack
11/3/2009, 05:35 PM
That's great and all, but I would please ask you to stop personally attacking me on this board and stop starting threads about me for once. Your obsession with me is getting weird.

Take down your stupid BHO quote and we'll talk.

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 05:40 PM
Can we start a "Somebody Needs a Tissue" thread? :D

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 05:40 PM
Take down your stupid BHO quote and we'll talk.Why? I'm not attacking you like you're attacking me in your sig and on other threads.

JohnnyMack
11/3/2009, 05:45 PM
Why? I'm not attacking you like you're attacking me in your sig and on other threads.

I'm not attacking you either. I saw this posted on another place in the internet and just thought people should know. I have no idea if it's true or not and I'm not passing judgment, I just found it interesting.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 05:52 PM
I'm not attacking you either. I saw this posted on another place in the internet and just thought people should know. I have no idea if it's true or not and I'm not passing judgment, I just found it interesting.Given how obsessed you seem to be with me lately, I don't find that at all surprising.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 05:56 PM
BTW, I believe your quote could be considered libel. Just saying..

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 05:57 PM
For the record, I was the one who posted it on the other website.

;)

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 05:57 PM
BTW, I believe your quote could be considered libel. Just saying..You'd have to prove that it somehow cost YOU some kind of financial loss.

And then prove that all the other stupid **** you've said in the past wasn't what really got ye fired. :D

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 06:02 PM
You'd have to prove that it somehow cost YOU some kind of financial loss.Or that it MIGHT.

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 06:06 PM
Okay...please prove how something...MIGHT cost you money.

PROVE IT.

After you blow your nose.

Fraggle145
11/3/2009, 06:07 PM
http://spectraproductsgroup.com/store/media/sat38.jpg

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 06:09 PM
Also, I should throw in that back in the day...about 2 years ago, I was given a 24 hour ban for a personal attack on George W. Bush.

Seriously.

That is not a joke.

I was banned...for calling George W. Bush a "****ing moran."

And when I argued, the mod actually said that the personal attacks rule covered ANYONE, not just posters. LOL

So, technically, under that interpretation of the rules...you're breaking the same rules.

Food for thought.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 06:11 PM
Okay...please prove how something...MIGHT cost you money.

PROVE IT.

After you blow your nose.Well, since this is a common nickname I use, even on my professional consulting email, I can see very easily someone catching it on google or something.

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 06:13 PM
Also, I should throw in that back in the day...about 2 years ago, I was given a 24 hour ban for a personal attack on George W. Bush.

Seriously.

That is not a joke.

I was banned...for calling George W. Bush a "****ing moran."

And when I argued, the mod actually said that the personal attacks rule covered ANYONE, not just posters. LOL

So, technically, under that interpretation of the rules...you're breaking the same rules.

Food for thought.Board rules don't say anything about public figures. But they do say something about personal attacks.

Fraggle145
11/3/2009, 06:17 PM
Your personal attacks on everyone's intelligence do get pretty old... just sayin'

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 06:18 PM
Board rules don't say anything about public figures. But they do say something about personal attacks.Didn't stop the mod from banning me for 24 hours for a "personal attack on the President."

By the way...President Dubya Bush WAS a ****ing moron. So I was vindicated, in the end. :D


Well, since this is a common nickname I use, even on my professional consulting email, I can see very easily someone catching it on google or something.Okay. Two points:
1) STILL...good luck PROVING that you MIGHT have lost money from it.

and

b) REALLY? You REALLY go by OklahomaTuba? You REALLY lay proud claim to this Internet persona and the things you've said? Really? You really, truly want people to associate the drooling, wingnut, tin foil hat wearing, conspiracy theory clinging, xenophobic narrowminded posts that you've made on here with the REAL WORLD YOU???? LOL

Yeah...again...good luck PROVING that his one little quote was what MIGHT have cost you money. :D

KABOOKIE
11/3/2009, 06:19 PM
How do you keep idiots occupied?

Petro-Sooner
11/3/2009, 06:20 PM
Dont forget bacon hater!

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 06:21 PM
The irony of all this is that you can't comprehend the point that it is IMPOSSIBLE to PROVE that something MIGHT have happened.

:D

Well, that...and the fact that we've completely threadjacked another one of your inane "hate everything left" threads into a thread about you crying that someone hurt your feelers. :D

OklahomaTuba
11/3/2009, 06:36 PM
The irony of all this is that you can't comprehend the point that it is IMPOSSIBLE to PROVE that something MIGHT have happened.Interesting stuff on "cybersmearing" and online defamation out there. Seems even Oklahoma may have a law about it? I think you're right about MIGHT though, but that is my concern at the moment, given I use the name in other areas that people professionally know me by.


Yes, laws relating to defamation are applicable to e mail and other online activities. For example, if a person commits libel against you through e mail or other on line activities, the publisher, and any re­publisher, of the offensive statement can be held accountable for damages. This is why it is wise to be careful about anything you write in an e mail message or online chat room. If the victim is harmed by your action, you can be held liable for his or her losses.

If you think you've been defamed by false information passed on by a computer channel, or worry about whether you can make an aggressive advertising claim, it might be worth talking to a qualified lawyer. http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Defamation-of-Character/Federal/are-e-mail-and-on-line-activities-subject-to.html

NormanPride
11/3/2009, 07:02 PM
I think I saw something tuba related on that informative Glenn Beck website about the murder and rape of a young girl in 1990.

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
11/3/2009, 07:13 PM
Take down your stupid BHO quote and we'll talk.That IS a stupid quote from our O. Too bad not enough people were keenly aware of it BEFORE the "election" last yr.

Okla-homey
11/3/2009, 07:41 PM
The irony of all this is that you can't comprehend the point that it is IMPOSSIBLE to PROVE that something MIGHT have happened.



Not so fast. You can prove, at least in a court of law, a thing MIGHT have happened, based on a person's habit, custom and/or practice.

I'm not sure that's particularly relevant here, but it was a big deal in one of may cases recently, and I just thought I'd point that out. Kinda FWIW.;)

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 08:23 PM
Interesting stuff on "cybersmearing" and online defamation out there. Seems even Oklahoma may have a law about it? I think you're right about MIGHT though, but that is my concern at the moment, given I use the name in other areas that people professionally know me by.

http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Defamation-of-Character/Federal/are-e-mail-and-on-line-activities-subject-to.html
Now you might want to consider the likelihood of someone believing that you enjoy sex with animals simply based on a "quote" found online.

Just sayin'...Mr. Mock Indignation. ;)

LosAngelesSooner
11/3/2009, 08:25 PM
Not so fast. You can prove, at least in a court of law, a thing MIGHT have happened, based on a person's habit, custom and/or practice.

I'm not sure that's particularly relevant here, but it was a big deal in one of may cases recently, and I just thought I'd point that out. Kinda FWIW.;)Maybe in a court of law, but certainly not scientifically or anywhere else where reason and logic prevail. ;)

SoonerBorn68
11/3/2009, 10:00 PM
Maybe in a court of law, but certainly not scientifically or anywhere else where reason and logic prevail. ;)

Kinda like global warming.

SoonerBorn68
11/3/2009, 10:00 PM
No smiley necessary.

tommieharris91
11/3/2009, 11:36 PM
Your personal attacks on everyone's intelligence do get pretty old... just sayin'

This should go for both LAS and Tuba.

SanJoaquinSooner
11/3/2009, 11:59 PM
Quote:
"… the Constitution allows for many things, but what it does not allow is the most revealing. The so-called Founders did not allow for economic freedom. While political freedom is supposedly a cornerstone of the document, the distribution of wealth is not even mentioned. While many believed that the new Constitution gave them liberty, it instead fitted them with the shackles of hypocrisy."

-Barack H. Obama

Why do you continue to use the senior thesis hoax quote?
Doesn't the inside of the tuba smell to high heaven when it's filled with so much bullsh1t?

GottaHavePride
11/4/2009, 12:11 AM
That IS a stupid quote from our O. Too bad not enough people were keenly aware of it BEFORE the "election" last yr.

No one is aware of it because someone MADE IT the **** UP.


Pajamas Media issued a notice a few days after its original report acknowledging that the information about Barack Obama's Columbia thesis was a hoax. Joe Klein also affirmed that he had never seen the paper in question.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/columbiathesis.asp



And yes, I saw your reported posts, Tuba. And since most of the ones you reported are posts that are (rightfully so) pointing out that you're using a VERIFIED INTERNET HOAX as some sort of evidence that Obama is a closet socialist, I don't really see any reason to do anything about it.

If you don't like Obama's policies that's cool, but using that quote in your sig makes you look like a tinfoil-hat-wearing moron.

Fraggle145
11/4/2009, 12:29 AM
http://aspextrme.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/pown3d.jpg

RUSH LIMBAUGH is my clone!
11/4/2009, 01:07 AM
I looked a little bit for O's quotes pertaining to the constitution. This one, from a radio show (google obama quote constitution) is pertinent:

Obama:
To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that. …

I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. You know, the institution just isn’t structured that way.

LosAngelesSooner
11/4/2009, 04:02 AM
Kinda like global warming.:rolleyes:

Yeah.

JUUUST like Global Climate Change...and that pesky evolution...and that silly gravity.

Good job, SB68. You keep reminding us just how smart you are. Thanks. ;)

KABOOKIE
11/4/2009, 07:30 AM
:rolleyes:

Yeah.

JUUUST like Global Climate Change...and that pesky evolution...and that silly evolution.

Good job, SB68. You keep reminding us just how smart you are. Thanks. ;)

I don't believe in theory of silly evolution. On the other hand, pesky evolution is a FACT!

KABOOKIE
11/4/2009, 07:32 AM
Now, let's get back to the original topic of Obama's Pasture being a gigantic doosh.

Half a Hundred
11/4/2009, 11:44 AM
Now, let's get back to the original topic of Obama's Pasture being a gigantic doosh.

Given that pastures are prone to having cattle relieve themselves upon it, I'd say that it is more akin to a turd sandwich.

LosAngelesSooner
11/4/2009, 07:26 PM
Not nearly as dooshy as his poster.