PDA

View Full Version : More proof of the USuck bias


Sirus
9/20/2009, 02:09 PM
OU was ranked #3 and was beaten by a ranked team then fell to #13.

The condoms, who were #3 got beaten by a team that was not only unranked but didn't win a game last season and they only fell to #12?

Please explain.
kevpks
9/20/2009, 02:21 PM
USC had to go without their starting QB...nevermind.
StoopTroup
9/20/2009, 02:23 PM
tosu road game.
Sirus
9/20/2009, 02:26 PM
tosu road game.

most people thought the luckeyes were overrated to begin with as usual.
StoopTroup
9/20/2009, 02:30 PM
most people thought the luckeyes were overrated to begin with as usual.

Again...you asked. It's a fact that they got accolades after the win. It was sickening to watch as ESPN started with the QB prodigy stuff and as kevpks is trying to explain to you....oh well nevermind....lol
Mark_in_Tulsa
9/20/2009, 02:48 PM
They would of been 13 had BYU not lost.
BoulderSooner79
9/20/2009, 02:58 PM
This is week 3 and we fell in week 1. More teams have lost since then that USC would have fallen behind. Not saying there is no bias, but that's not a valid comparison.
SoonerObsession
9/20/2009, 03:03 PM
USC does have a quality road win. I have no problem with it.
pilobolus
9/20/2009, 03:42 PM
USC lost on the road.
StoopTroup
9/20/2009, 03:44 PM
USC lost on the road.

and won on the road.

Weird huh?